Cargando…

A comparison of dexmedetomidine plus ketamine combination with dexmedetomidine alone for awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation: A randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We designed a study to compare the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine plus ketamine combination with dexmedetomidine alone in search of an ideal sedation regime, which would achieve better intubating conditions, hemodynamic stability, and sedation for awake fiberoptic nasotracheal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sinha, Sunil Kumar, Joshiraj, Bandi, Chaudhary, Lalita, Hayaran, Nitin, Kaur, Manpreet, Jain, Aruna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25425777
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.142846
_version_ 1782344906699702272
author Sinha, Sunil Kumar
Joshiraj, Bandi
Chaudhary, Lalita
Hayaran, Nitin
Kaur, Manpreet
Jain, Aruna
author_facet Sinha, Sunil Kumar
Joshiraj, Bandi
Chaudhary, Lalita
Hayaran, Nitin
Kaur, Manpreet
Jain, Aruna
author_sort Sinha, Sunil Kumar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We designed a study to compare the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine plus ketamine combination with dexmedetomidine alone in search of an ideal sedation regime, which would achieve better intubating conditions, hemodynamic stability, and sedation for awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 adult patients of age group 18-60 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II posted for elective surgery under general anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups of 30 each in this prospective randomized controlled double-blinded study. Groups I and II patients received a bolus dose of dexmedetomidine at 1 mcg/kg over 10 min followed by a continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine at 0.5 mcg/kg/h. Upon completion of the dexmedetomidine bolus, Group I patients received 15 mg of ketamine and an infusion of ketamine at 20 mg/h followed by awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation, while Group II patients upon completion of dexmedetomidine bolus received plain normal saline instead of ketamine. Hemodynamic variables like heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP), oxygen saturation, electrocardiogram changes, sedation score (modified Observer assessment of alertness/sedation score), intubation score (vocal cord movement and coughing), grimace score, time taken for intubation, amount of lignocaine used were noted during the course of study. Patient satisfaction score and level of recall were assessed during the postoperative visit the next day. RESULTS: Group I patients maintained a stable HR and MAP (<10% fall when compared with the baseline value). Sedation score (3.47 vs. 3.93) and patient satisfaction score were better in Group I patients. There was no significant difference in intubation scores, grimace scores, oxygen saturation and level of recall when compared between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The use of dexmedetomidine plus ketamine combination in awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation provided better hemodynamic stability and sedation than dexmedetomidine alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4234788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42347882014-11-25 A comparison of dexmedetomidine plus ketamine combination with dexmedetomidine alone for awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation: A randomized controlled study Sinha, Sunil Kumar Joshiraj, Bandi Chaudhary, Lalita Hayaran, Nitin Kaur, Manpreet Jain, Aruna J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We designed a study to compare the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine plus ketamine combination with dexmedetomidine alone in search of an ideal sedation regime, which would achieve better intubating conditions, hemodynamic stability, and sedation for awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 adult patients of age group 18-60 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II posted for elective surgery under general anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups of 30 each in this prospective randomized controlled double-blinded study. Groups I and II patients received a bolus dose of dexmedetomidine at 1 mcg/kg over 10 min followed by a continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine at 0.5 mcg/kg/h. Upon completion of the dexmedetomidine bolus, Group I patients received 15 mg of ketamine and an infusion of ketamine at 20 mg/h followed by awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation, while Group II patients upon completion of dexmedetomidine bolus received plain normal saline instead of ketamine. Hemodynamic variables like heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP), oxygen saturation, electrocardiogram changes, sedation score (modified Observer assessment of alertness/sedation score), intubation score (vocal cord movement and coughing), grimace score, time taken for intubation, amount of lignocaine used were noted during the course of study. Patient satisfaction score and level of recall were assessed during the postoperative visit the next day. RESULTS: Group I patients maintained a stable HR and MAP (<10% fall when compared with the baseline value). Sedation score (3.47 vs. 3.93) and patient satisfaction score were better in Group I patients. There was no significant difference in intubation scores, grimace scores, oxygen saturation and level of recall when compared between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The use of dexmedetomidine plus ketamine combination in awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation provided better hemodynamic stability and sedation than dexmedetomidine alone. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4234788/ /pubmed/25425777 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.142846 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sinha, Sunil Kumar
Joshiraj, Bandi
Chaudhary, Lalita
Hayaran, Nitin
Kaur, Manpreet
Jain, Aruna
A comparison of dexmedetomidine plus ketamine combination with dexmedetomidine alone for awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation: A randomized controlled study
title A comparison of dexmedetomidine plus ketamine combination with dexmedetomidine alone for awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation: A randomized controlled study
title_full A comparison of dexmedetomidine plus ketamine combination with dexmedetomidine alone for awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation: A randomized controlled study
title_fullStr A comparison of dexmedetomidine plus ketamine combination with dexmedetomidine alone for awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation: A randomized controlled study
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of dexmedetomidine plus ketamine combination with dexmedetomidine alone for awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation: A randomized controlled study
title_short A comparison of dexmedetomidine plus ketamine combination with dexmedetomidine alone for awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation: A randomized controlled study
title_sort comparison of dexmedetomidine plus ketamine combination with dexmedetomidine alone for awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25425777
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.142846
work_keys_str_mv AT sinhasunilkumar acomparisonofdexmedetomidineplusketaminecombinationwithdexmedetomidinealoneforawakefiberopticnasotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT joshirajbandi acomparisonofdexmedetomidineplusketaminecombinationwithdexmedetomidinealoneforawakefiberopticnasotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT chaudharylalita acomparisonofdexmedetomidineplusketaminecombinationwithdexmedetomidinealoneforawakefiberopticnasotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT hayarannitin acomparisonofdexmedetomidineplusketaminecombinationwithdexmedetomidinealoneforawakefiberopticnasotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT kaurmanpreet acomparisonofdexmedetomidineplusketaminecombinationwithdexmedetomidinealoneforawakefiberopticnasotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT jainaruna acomparisonofdexmedetomidineplusketaminecombinationwithdexmedetomidinealoneforawakefiberopticnasotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT sinhasunilkumar comparisonofdexmedetomidineplusketaminecombinationwithdexmedetomidinealoneforawakefiberopticnasotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT joshirajbandi comparisonofdexmedetomidineplusketaminecombinationwithdexmedetomidinealoneforawakefiberopticnasotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT chaudharylalita comparisonofdexmedetomidineplusketaminecombinationwithdexmedetomidinealoneforawakefiberopticnasotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT hayarannitin comparisonofdexmedetomidineplusketaminecombinationwithdexmedetomidinealoneforawakefiberopticnasotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT kaurmanpreet comparisonofdexmedetomidineplusketaminecombinationwithdexmedetomidinealoneforawakefiberopticnasotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT jainaruna comparisonofdexmedetomidineplusketaminecombinationwithdexmedetomidinealoneforawakefiberopticnasotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledstudy