Cargando…

Comparison of subarachnoid block with bupivacaine and bupivacaine with fentanyl on entropy and sedation: A prospective randomized double-blind study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We studied the state entropy to monitor the sedative effect of subarachnoid block (SAB) using bupivacaine alone or combination of bupivacaine and fentanyl. The effect of use of fentanyl via the subarachnoid route on the sedation level was also studied using the entropy scores an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Varma, Prerna, Darlong, Vanlal, Pandey, Ravinder, Garg, Rakesh, Chandralekha, Punj, Jyotsna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25425782
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.142854
_version_ 1782344907895078912
author Varma, Prerna
Darlong, Vanlal
Pandey, Ravinder
Garg, Rakesh
Chandralekha,
Punj, Jyotsna
author_facet Varma, Prerna
Darlong, Vanlal
Pandey, Ravinder
Garg, Rakesh
Chandralekha,
Punj, Jyotsna
author_sort Varma, Prerna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We studied the state entropy to monitor the sedative effect of subarachnoid block (SAB) using bupivacaine alone or combination of bupivacaine and fentanyl. The effect of use of fentanyl via the subarachnoid route on the sedation level was also studied using the entropy scores and the decrease in the requirement of propofol used as an adjuvant sedative drug. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective randomized double-blind study, 30 patients of age 18-70 years requiring SAB were enrolled for the study. Patients with any known allergy to study drugs, contraindication for SAB, obesity, neurological or psychiatric disease on concurrent medication and refusal were excluded from the study. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: Group C: SAB was administered with 2.5 mL (12.5 mg) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine; Group D: SAB was administered with 2.5 mL of 2 mL (10 mg) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.5 mL (25 μg) fentanyl. Propofol infusion was started if the state entropy (SE) value was ≥75, at the rate of 100 μg/kg/min till the SE value reaches in the range of 60-75 (recorded as onset time). Thereafter the infusion rate was titrated to maintain SE value between 60 and 75. The level of sedation was measured with SE and Ramsay sedation (RS) scale. RESULTS: The demographic profile and baseline parameters, were comparable in two groups (P > 0.05). After SAB, decrease in SE and response entropy was noted in both the groups and fall was significant in Group D (P < 0.0001). The total propfol required in thew two groups were comparable being 3.97 ± 2.14 mg/kg in Group C and 3.41 ± 2.34 mg/kg in Group D (P = 0.342). The change in the mean RS values was from 1.17 ± 0.38 to 1.69 ± 0.47 in Group D (P = 0.06), whereas in Group C it was from 1.03 ± 0.18 to 1.43 ± 0.50 (P = 0.041) within 20 min of SAB. CONCLUSION: Subarachnoid block causes sedation per se, but the level of sedation is not clinically significant and the sedation caused is not enough to avoid sedative agents for allaying anxiety in patients intraoperatively. The sedative effect of SAB was enhanced by adding intrathecal fentanyl probably because of better quality of SAB. SE showed good correlation with RS scaling system. Therefore, SE may be used as reliable tool to titrate sedation in patients undergoing surgery under SAB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4234793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42347932014-11-25 Comparison of subarachnoid block with bupivacaine and bupivacaine with fentanyl on entropy and sedation: A prospective randomized double-blind study Varma, Prerna Darlong, Vanlal Pandey, Ravinder Garg, Rakesh Chandralekha, Punj, Jyotsna J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We studied the state entropy to monitor the sedative effect of subarachnoid block (SAB) using bupivacaine alone or combination of bupivacaine and fentanyl. The effect of use of fentanyl via the subarachnoid route on the sedation level was also studied using the entropy scores and the decrease in the requirement of propofol used as an adjuvant sedative drug. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective randomized double-blind study, 30 patients of age 18-70 years requiring SAB were enrolled for the study. Patients with any known allergy to study drugs, contraindication for SAB, obesity, neurological or psychiatric disease on concurrent medication and refusal were excluded from the study. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: Group C: SAB was administered with 2.5 mL (12.5 mg) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine; Group D: SAB was administered with 2.5 mL of 2 mL (10 mg) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.5 mL (25 μg) fentanyl. Propofol infusion was started if the state entropy (SE) value was ≥75, at the rate of 100 μg/kg/min till the SE value reaches in the range of 60-75 (recorded as onset time). Thereafter the infusion rate was titrated to maintain SE value between 60 and 75. The level of sedation was measured with SE and Ramsay sedation (RS) scale. RESULTS: The demographic profile and baseline parameters, were comparable in two groups (P > 0.05). After SAB, decrease in SE and response entropy was noted in both the groups and fall was significant in Group D (P < 0.0001). The total propfol required in thew two groups were comparable being 3.97 ± 2.14 mg/kg in Group C and 3.41 ± 2.34 mg/kg in Group D (P = 0.342). The change in the mean RS values was from 1.17 ± 0.38 to 1.69 ± 0.47 in Group D (P = 0.06), whereas in Group C it was from 1.03 ± 0.18 to 1.43 ± 0.50 (P = 0.041) within 20 min of SAB. CONCLUSION: Subarachnoid block causes sedation per se, but the level of sedation is not clinically significant and the sedation caused is not enough to avoid sedative agents for allaying anxiety in patients intraoperatively. The sedative effect of SAB was enhanced by adding intrathecal fentanyl probably because of better quality of SAB. SE showed good correlation with RS scaling system. Therefore, SE may be used as reliable tool to titrate sedation in patients undergoing surgery under SAB. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4234793/ /pubmed/25425782 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.142854 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Varma, Prerna
Darlong, Vanlal
Pandey, Ravinder
Garg, Rakesh
Chandralekha,
Punj, Jyotsna
Comparison of subarachnoid block with bupivacaine and bupivacaine with fentanyl on entropy and sedation: A prospective randomized double-blind study
title Comparison of subarachnoid block with bupivacaine and bupivacaine with fentanyl on entropy and sedation: A prospective randomized double-blind study
title_full Comparison of subarachnoid block with bupivacaine and bupivacaine with fentanyl on entropy and sedation: A prospective randomized double-blind study
title_fullStr Comparison of subarachnoid block with bupivacaine and bupivacaine with fentanyl on entropy and sedation: A prospective randomized double-blind study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of subarachnoid block with bupivacaine and bupivacaine with fentanyl on entropy and sedation: A prospective randomized double-blind study
title_short Comparison of subarachnoid block with bupivacaine and bupivacaine with fentanyl on entropy and sedation: A prospective randomized double-blind study
title_sort comparison of subarachnoid block with bupivacaine and bupivacaine with fentanyl on entropy and sedation: a prospective randomized double-blind study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25425782
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.142854
work_keys_str_mv AT varmaprerna comparisonofsubarachnoidblockwithbupivacaineandbupivacainewithfentanylonentropyandsedationaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudy
AT darlongvanlal comparisonofsubarachnoidblockwithbupivacaineandbupivacainewithfentanylonentropyandsedationaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudy
AT pandeyravinder comparisonofsubarachnoidblockwithbupivacaineandbupivacainewithfentanylonentropyandsedationaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudy
AT gargrakesh comparisonofsubarachnoidblockwithbupivacaineandbupivacainewithfentanylonentropyandsedationaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudy
AT chandralekha comparisonofsubarachnoidblockwithbupivacaineandbupivacainewithfentanylonentropyandsedationaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudy
AT punjjyotsna comparisonofsubarachnoidblockwithbupivacaineandbupivacainewithfentanylonentropyandsedationaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudy