Cargando…

Glenohumeral relationships at different angles of abduction

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to clarify the relationships among anatomical landmarks of the glenohumeral joint at different angles of abduction. METHODS: Fifteen volunteers (ten men, five women; mean age 29 years) were enrolled in this study. Images of externally and internally rotated p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Inui, Hiroaki, Tanaka, Hiroshi, Nobuhara, Katsuya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Paris 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24863564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00276-014-1315-5
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to clarify the relationships among anatomical landmarks of the glenohumeral joint at different angles of abduction. METHODS: Fifteen volunteers (ten men, five women; mean age 29 years) were enrolled in this study. Images of externally and internally rotated positions at 45°, 90°, and 135° of abduction in the plane 30° anterior to the trunk were taken using an open magnetic resonance imaging system. Landmarks including the glenoidal long axis with its center, bicipital groove, center of the head, and humeral shaft axis were determined. Using a line set on the surface of the head in the plane parallel to the humeral axis (including the head center and bicipital groove with its parallel and perpendicular lines), the glenoid location and rotational relationships were investigated in each position. RESULTS: The average angles of axial rotation were 48° ± 27° at 45º of abduction, 71° ± 20° at 90° of abduction, and 40° ± 27° at 135° of abduction. The trajectories of the glenoid center primarily extended over the anterior portion of the humeral head at 45° of abduction and over the posterior portion at 90° of abduction, while those at 135° of abduction were localized on a small upper portion of the head. CONCLUSIONS: The glenohumeral relationships demonstrated that arm abduction might influence shoulder function through its effects on the portion of the humeral surface in contact with the glenoid during rotation and the resultant changes in the glenohumeral relationships.