Cargando…

Argatroban versus Lepirudin in critically ill patients (ALicia): a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Critically ill patients often require renal replacement therapy accompanied by thrombocytopenia. Thrombocytopenia during heparin anticoagulation may be due to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with need for alternative anticoagulation. Therefore, we compared argatroban and lepirudin in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Treschan, Tanja A, Schaefer, Maximilian S, Geib, Johann, Bahlmann, Astrid, Brezina, Tobias, Werner, Patrick, Golla, Elisabeth, Greinacher, Andreas, Pannen, Benedikt, Kindgen-Milles, Detlef, Kienbaum, Peter, Beiderlinden, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25344113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0588-8
_version_ 1782344921653444608
author Treschan, Tanja A
Schaefer, Maximilian S
Geib, Johann
Bahlmann, Astrid
Brezina, Tobias
Werner, Patrick
Golla, Elisabeth
Greinacher, Andreas
Pannen, Benedikt
Kindgen-Milles, Detlef
Kienbaum, Peter
Beiderlinden, Martin
author_facet Treschan, Tanja A
Schaefer, Maximilian S
Geib, Johann
Bahlmann, Astrid
Brezina, Tobias
Werner, Patrick
Golla, Elisabeth
Greinacher, Andreas
Pannen, Benedikt
Kindgen-Milles, Detlef
Kienbaum, Peter
Beiderlinden, Martin
author_sort Treschan, Tanja A
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Critically ill patients often require renal replacement therapy accompanied by thrombocytopenia. Thrombocytopenia during heparin anticoagulation may be due to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with need for alternative anticoagulation. Therefore, we compared argatroban and lepirudin in critically ill surgical patients. METHODS: Following institutional review board approval and written informed consent, critically ill surgical patients more than or equal to 18 years with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, were randomly assigned to receive double-blind argatroban or lepirudin anticoagulation targeting an activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) of 1.5 to 2 times baseline. In patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy we compared the life-time of hemodialysis filters. We evaluated in all patients the incidence of bleeding and thrombembolic events. RESULTS: We identified 66 patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, including 28 requiring renal replacement therapy. Mean filter lifetimes did not differ between groups (argatroban 32 ± 25 hours (n = 12) versus lepirudin 27 ± 21 hours (n = 16), mean difference 5 hours, 95% CI −13 to 23, P = 0.227). Among all 66 patients, relevant bleeding occurred in four argatroban- versus eleven lepirudin-patients (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.1 to 14.0, P = 0.040). In the argatroban-group, three thromboembolic events occurred compared to two in the lepirudin group (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.1 to 4.4, P = 0.639). The incidence of confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was 23% (n = 15) in our study population. CONCLUSIONS: This first randomized controlled double-blind trial comparing two direct thrombin inhibitors showed comparable effectiveness for renal replacement therapy, but suggests fewer bleeds in surgical patients with argatroban anticoagulation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov NCT00798525. Registered 25 November 2008 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-014-0588-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4234853
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42348532014-11-19 Argatroban versus Lepirudin in critically ill patients (ALicia): a randomized controlled trial Treschan, Tanja A Schaefer, Maximilian S Geib, Johann Bahlmann, Astrid Brezina, Tobias Werner, Patrick Golla, Elisabeth Greinacher, Andreas Pannen, Benedikt Kindgen-Milles, Detlef Kienbaum, Peter Beiderlinden, Martin Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Critically ill patients often require renal replacement therapy accompanied by thrombocytopenia. Thrombocytopenia during heparin anticoagulation may be due to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with need for alternative anticoagulation. Therefore, we compared argatroban and lepirudin in critically ill surgical patients. METHODS: Following institutional review board approval and written informed consent, critically ill surgical patients more than or equal to 18 years with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, were randomly assigned to receive double-blind argatroban or lepirudin anticoagulation targeting an activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) of 1.5 to 2 times baseline. In patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy we compared the life-time of hemodialysis filters. We evaluated in all patients the incidence of bleeding and thrombembolic events. RESULTS: We identified 66 patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, including 28 requiring renal replacement therapy. Mean filter lifetimes did not differ between groups (argatroban 32 ± 25 hours (n = 12) versus lepirudin 27 ± 21 hours (n = 16), mean difference 5 hours, 95% CI −13 to 23, P = 0.227). Among all 66 patients, relevant bleeding occurred in four argatroban- versus eleven lepirudin-patients (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.1 to 14.0, P = 0.040). In the argatroban-group, three thromboembolic events occurred compared to two in the lepirudin group (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.1 to 4.4, P = 0.639). The incidence of confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was 23% (n = 15) in our study population. CONCLUSIONS: This first randomized controlled double-blind trial comparing two direct thrombin inhibitors showed comparable effectiveness for renal replacement therapy, but suggests fewer bleeds in surgical patients with argatroban anticoagulation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov NCT00798525. Registered 25 November 2008 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-014-0588-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-10-25 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4234853/ /pubmed/25344113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0588-8 Text en © Treschan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Treschan, Tanja A
Schaefer, Maximilian S
Geib, Johann
Bahlmann, Astrid
Brezina, Tobias
Werner, Patrick
Golla, Elisabeth
Greinacher, Andreas
Pannen, Benedikt
Kindgen-Milles, Detlef
Kienbaum, Peter
Beiderlinden, Martin
Argatroban versus Lepirudin in critically ill patients (ALicia): a randomized controlled trial
title Argatroban versus Lepirudin in critically ill patients (ALicia): a randomized controlled trial
title_full Argatroban versus Lepirudin in critically ill patients (ALicia): a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Argatroban versus Lepirudin in critically ill patients (ALicia): a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Argatroban versus Lepirudin in critically ill patients (ALicia): a randomized controlled trial
title_short Argatroban versus Lepirudin in critically ill patients (ALicia): a randomized controlled trial
title_sort argatroban versus lepirudin in critically ill patients (alicia): a randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25344113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0588-8
work_keys_str_mv AT treschantanjaa argatrobanversuslepirudinincriticallyillpatientsaliciaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schaefermaximilians argatrobanversuslepirudinincriticallyillpatientsaliciaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT geibjohann argatrobanversuslepirudinincriticallyillpatientsaliciaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bahlmannastrid argatrobanversuslepirudinincriticallyillpatientsaliciaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT brezinatobias argatrobanversuslepirudinincriticallyillpatientsaliciaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wernerpatrick argatrobanversuslepirudinincriticallyillpatientsaliciaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gollaelisabeth argatrobanversuslepirudinincriticallyillpatientsaliciaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT greinacherandreas argatrobanversuslepirudinincriticallyillpatientsaliciaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pannenbenedikt argatrobanversuslepirudinincriticallyillpatientsaliciaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kindgenmillesdetlef argatrobanversuslepirudinincriticallyillpatientsaliciaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kienbaumpeter argatrobanversuslepirudinincriticallyillpatientsaliciaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT beiderlindenmartin argatrobanversuslepirudinincriticallyillpatientsaliciaarandomizedcontrolledtrial