Cargando…
Safeguarding the Integrity of Science Communication by Restraining 'Rational Cheating' in Peer Review
Peer review is the pillar of the integrity of science communication. It is often beset with flaws as well as accusations of unreliability and lack of predictive validity. 'Rational cheating' by reviewers is a threat to the validity of peer review. It may diminish the value of good papers b...
Autor principal: | Barroga, Edward F. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25408573 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2014.29.11.1450 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Innovative Strategies for Peer Review
por: Barroga, Edward
Publicado: (2020) -
Rewarding Peer Reviewers: Maintaining the Integrity of Science Communication
por: Gasparyan, Armen Yuri, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Fundamental Shifts in Research, Ethics and Peer Review in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic
por: Barroga, Edward, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Reference Accuracy: Authors', Reviewers', Editors', and Publishers' Contributions
por: Barroga, Edward F.
Publicado: (2014) -
Essential Components of Educational Programs on Biomedical Writing, Editing, and Publishing
por: Barroga, Edward, et al.
Publicado: (2015)