Cargando…

Mathematical Formulation of DMH-Based Inverse Optimization

Purpose: To introduce the concept of dose–mass-based inverse optimization for radiotherapy applications. Materials and Methods: Mathematical derivation of the dose–mass-based formalism is presented. This mathematical representation is compared to the most commonly used dose–volume-based formulation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mihaylov, Ivaylo B., Moros, Eduardo G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4235072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25478325
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2014.00331
_version_ 1782344960998113280
author Mihaylov, Ivaylo B.
Moros, Eduardo G.
author_facet Mihaylov, Ivaylo B.
Moros, Eduardo G.
author_sort Mihaylov, Ivaylo B.
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To introduce the concept of dose–mass-based inverse optimization for radiotherapy applications. Materials and Methods: Mathematical derivation of the dose–mass-based formalism is presented. This mathematical representation is compared to the most commonly used dose–volume-based formulation used in inverse optimization. A simple example on digitally created phantom is presented. The phantom consists of three regions: a target surrounded by high- and low-density regions. The target is irradiated with two beams through those regions and inverse optimization with dose–volume and dose–mass-based objective functions is performed. The basic properties of the two optimization types are demonstrated on the phantom. Results: It is demonstrated that dose–volume optimization is a special case of dose–mass optimization. In a homogenous media, dose–mass optimization turns into dose–volume optimization. The dose calculations performed on the digital phantom show that in this very simple case dose–mass optimization tends to penalize more the dose delivery through the high-density region and therefore it results in delivering more dose through the low-density region. Conclusion: It was demonstrated that dose–mass-based optimization is mathematically more general than dose–volume-based optimization. In the case of constant density media, dose–mass optimization transforms into dose–volume optimization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4235072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42350722014-12-04 Mathematical Formulation of DMH-Based Inverse Optimization Mihaylov, Ivaylo B. Moros, Eduardo G. Front Oncol Oncology Purpose: To introduce the concept of dose–mass-based inverse optimization for radiotherapy applications. Materials and Methods: Mathematical derivation of the dose–mass-based formalism is presented. This mathematical representation is compared to the most commonly used dose–volume-based formulation used in inverse optimization. A simple example on digitally created phantom is presented. The phantom consists of three regions: a target surrounded by high- and low-density regions. The target is irradiated with two beams through those regions and inverse optimization with dose–volume and dose–mass-based objective functions is performed. The basic properties of the two optimization types are demonstrated on the phantom. Results: It is demonstrated that dose–volume optimization is a special case of dose–mass optimization. In a homogenous media, dose–mass optimization turns into dose–volume optimization. The dose calculations performed on the digital phantom show that in this very simple case dose–mass optimization tends to penalize more the dose delivery through the high-density region and therefore it results in delivering more dose through the low-density region. Conclusion: It was demonstrated that dose–mass-based optimization is mathematically more general than dose–volume-based optimization. In the case of constant density media, dose–mass optimization transforms into dose–volume optimization. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4235072/ /pubmed/25478325 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2014.00331 Text en Copyright © 2014 Mihaylov and Moros. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Mihaylov, Ivaylo B.
Moros, Eduardo G.
Mathematical Formulation of DMH-Based Inverse Optimization
title Mathematical Formulation of DMH-Based Inverse Optimization
title_full Mathematical Formulation of DMH-Based Inverse Optimization
title_fullStr Mathematical Formulation of DMH-Based Inverse Optimization
title_full_unstemmed Mathematical Formulation of DMH-Based Inverse Optimization
title_short Mathematical Formulation of DMH-Based Inverse Optimization
title_sort mathematical formulation of dmh-based inverse optimization
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4235072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25478325
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2014.00331
work_keys_str_mv AT mihaylovivaylob mathematicalformulationofdmhbasedinverseoptimization
AT moroseduardog mathematicalformulationofdmhbasedinverseoptimization