Cargando…

Detection limit of intragenic deletions with targeted array comparative genomic hybridization

BACKGROUND: Pathogenic mutations range from single nucleotide changes to deletions or duplications that encompass a single exon to several genes. The use of gene-centric high-density array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) has revolutionized the detection of intragenic copy number variations....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Askree, S Hussain, Chin, Ephrem LH, Bean, Lora H, Coffee, Bradford, Tanner, Alice, Hegde, Madhuri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4235222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24304607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-14-116
_version_ 1782344991013601280
author Askree, S Hussain
Chin, Ephrem LH
Bean, Lora H
Coffee, Bradford
Tanner, Alice
Hegde, Madhuri
author_facet Askree, S Hussain
Chin, Ephrem LH
Bean, Lora H
Coffee, Bradford
Tanner, Alice
Hegde, Madhuri
author_sort Askree, S Hussain
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pathogenic mutations range from single nucleotide changes to deletions or duplications that encompass a single exon to several genes. The use of gene-centric high-density array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) has revolutionized the detection of intragenic copy number variations. We implemented an exon-centric design of high-resolution aCGH to detect single- and multi-exon deletions and duplications in a large set of genes using the OGT 60 K and 180 K arrays. Here we describe the molecular characterization and breakpoint mapping of deletions at the smaller end of the detectable range in several genes using aCGH. RESULTS: The method initially implemented to detect single to multiple exon deletions, was able to detect deletions much smaller than anticipated. The selected deletions we describe vary in size, ranging from over 2 kb to as small as 12 base pairs. The smallest of these deletions are only detectable after careful manual review during data analysis. Suspected deletions smaller than the detection size for which the method was optimized, were rigorously followed up and confirmed with PCR-based investigations to uncover the true detection size limit of intragenic deletions with this technology. False-positive deletion calls often demonstrated single nucleotide changes or an insertion causing lower hybridization of probes demonstrating the sensitivity of aCGH. CONCLUSIONS: With optimizing aCGH design and careful review process, aCGH can uncover intragenic deletions as small as dozen bases. These data provide insight that will help optimize probe coverage in array design and illustrate the true assay sensitivity. Mapping of the breakpoints confirms smaller deletions and contributes to the understanding of the mechanism behind these events. Our knowledge of the mutation spectra of several genes can be expected to change as previously unrecognized intragenic deletions are uncovered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4235222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42352222014-11-19 Detection limit of intragenic deletions with targeted array comparative genomic hybridization Askree, S Hussain Chin, Ephrem LH Bean, Lora H Coffee, Bradford Tanner, Alice Hegde, Madhuri BMC Genet Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Pathogenic mutations range from single nucleotide changes to deletions or duplications that encompass a single exon to several genes. The use of gene-centric high-density array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) has revolutionized the detection of intragenic copy number variations. We implemented an exon-centric design of high-resolution aCGH to detect single- and multi-exon deletions and duplications in a large set of genes using the OGT 60 K and 180 K arrays. Here we describe the molecular characterization and breakpoint mapping of deletions at the smaller end of the detectable range in several genes using aCGH. RESULTS: The method initially implemented to detect single to multiple exon deletions, was able to detect deletions much smaller than anticipated. The selected deletions we describe vary in size, ranging from over 2 kb to as small as 12 base pairs. The smallest of these deletions are only detectable after careful manual review during data analysis. Suspected deletions smaller than the detection size for which the method was optimized, were rigorously followed up and confirmed with PCR-based investigations to uncover the true detection size limit of intragenic deletions with this technology. False-positive deletion calls often demonstrated single nucleotide changes or an insertion causing lower hybridization of probes demonstrating the sensitivity of aCGH. CONCLUSIONS: With optimizing aCGH design and careful review process, aCGH can uncover intragenic deletions as small as dozen bases. These data provide insight that will help optimize probe coverage in array design and illustrate the true assay sensitivity. Mapping of the breakpoints confirms smaller deletions and contributes to the understanding of the mechanism behind these events. Our knowledge of the mutation spectra of several genes can be expected to change as previously unrecognized intragenic deletions are uncovered. BioMed Central 2013-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4235222/ /pubmed/24304607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-14-116 Text en Copyright © 2013 Askree et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Askree, S Hussain
Chin, Ephrem LH
Bean, Lora H
Coffee, Bradford
Tanner, Alice
Hegde, Madhuri
Detection limit of intragenic deletions with targeted array comparative genomic hybridization
title Detection limit of intragenic deletions with targeted array comparative genomic hybridization
title_full Detection limit of intragenic deletions with targeted array comparative genomic hybridization
title_fullStr Detection limit of intragenic deletions with targeted array comparative genomic hybridization
title_full_unstemmed Detection limit of intragenic deletions with targeted array comparative genomic hybridization
title_short Detection limit of intragenic deletions with targeted array comparative genomic hybridization
title_sort detection limit of intragenic deletions with targeted array comparative genomic hybridization
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4235222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24304607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-14-116
work_keys_str_mv AT askreeshussain detectionlimitofintragenicdeletionswithtargetedarraycomparativegenomichybridization
AT chinephremlh detectionlimitofintragenicdeletionswithtargetedarraycomparativegenomichybridization
AT beanlorah detectionlimitofintragenicdeletionswithtargetedarraycomparativegenomichybridization
AT coffeebradford detectionlimitofintragenicdeletionswithtargetedarraycomparativegenomichybridization
AT tanneralice detectionlimitofintragenicdeletionswithtargetedarraycomparativegenomichybridization
AT hegdemadhuri detectionlimitofintragenicdeletionswithtargetedarraycomparativegenomichybridization