Cargando…

The Design Organization Test: Further Demonstration of Reliability and Validity as a Brief Measure of Visuospatial Ability

Neuropsychological assessments are frequently time-consuming and fatiguing for patients. Brief screening evaluations may reduce test duration and allow more efficient use of time by permitting greater attention toward neuropsychological domains showing probable deficits. The Design Organization Test...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Killgore, William D. S., Gogel, Hannah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4235486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25265311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2013.811671
_version_ 1782345035066376192
author Killgore, William D. S.
Gogel, Hannah
author_facet Killgore, William D. S.
Gogel, Hannah
author_sort Killgore, William D. S.
collection PubMed
description Neuropsychological assessments are frequently time-consuming and fatiguing for patients. Brief screening evaluations may reduce test duration and allow more efficient use of time by permitting greater attention toward neuropsychological domains showing probable deficits. The Design Organization Test (DOT) was initially developed as a 2-min paper-and-pencil alternative for the Block Design (BD) subtest of the Wechsler scales. Although initially validated for clinical neurologic patients, we sought to further establish the reliability and validity of this test in a healthy, more diverse population. Two alternate versions of the DOT and the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) were administered to 61 healthy adult participants. The DOT showed high alternate forms reliability (r = .90–.92), and the two versions yielded equivalent levels of performance. The DOT was highly correlated with BD (r = .76–.79) and was significantly correlated with all subscales of the WASI. The DOT proved useful when used in lieu of BD in the calculation of WASI IQ scores. Findings support the reliability and validity of the DOT as a measure of visuospatial ability and suggest its potential worth as an efficient estimate of intellectual functioning in situations where lengthier tests may be inappropriate or unfeasible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4235486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42354862014-11-25 The Design Organization Test: Further Demonstration of Reliability and Validity as a Brief Measure of Visuospatial Ability Killgore, William D. S. Gogel, Hannah Appl Neuropsychol Adult Articles Neuropsychological assessments are frequently time-consuming and fatiguing for patients. Brief screening evaluations may reduce test duration and allow more efficient use of time by permitting greater attention toward neuropsychological domains showing probable deficits. The Design Organization Test (DOT) was initially developed as a 2-min paper-and-pencil alternative for the Block Design (BD) subtest of the Wechsler scales. Although initially validated for clinical neurologic patients, we sought to further establish the reliability and validity of this test in a healthy, more diverse population. Two alternate versions of the DOT and the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) were administered to 61 healthy adult participants. The DOT showed high alternate forms reliability (r = .90–.92), and the two versions yielded equivalent levels of performance. The DOT was highly correlated with BD (r = .76–.79) and was significantly correlated with all subscales of the WASI. The DOT proved useful when used in lieu of BD in the calculation of WASI IQ scores. Findings support the reliability and validity of the DOT as a measure of visuospatial ability and suggest its potential worth as an efficient estimate of intellectual functioning in situations where lengthier tests may be inappropriate or unfeasible. Taylor & Francis Group 2013-11-05 2014-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4235486/ /pubmed/25265311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2013.811671 Text en Copyright William D. S. Killgore and Hannah Gogel This is an Open Access article. Non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly attributed, cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way, is permitted. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.
spellingShingle Articles
Killgore, William D. S.
Gogel, Hannah
The Design Organization Test: Further Demonstration of Reliability and Validity as a Brief Measure of Visuospatial Ability
title The Design Organization Test: Further Demonstration of Reliability and Validity as a Brief Measure of Visuospatial Ability
title_full The Design Organization Test: Further Demonstration of Reliability and Validity as a Brief Measure of Visuospatial Ability
title_fullStr The Design Organization Test: Further Demonstration of Reliability and Validity as a Brief Measure of Visuospatial Ability
title_full_unstemmed The Design Organization Test: Further Demonstration of Reliability and Validity as a Brief Measure of Visuospatial Ability
title_short The Design Organization Test: Further Demonstration of Reliability and Validity as a Brief Measure of Visuospatial Ability
title_sort design organization test: further demonstration of reliability and validity as a brief measure of visuospatial ability
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4235486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25265311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2013.811671
work_keys_str_mv AT killgorewilliamds thedesignorganizationtestfurtherdemonstrationofreliabilityandvalidityasabriefmeasureofvisuospatialability
AT gogelhannah thedesignorganizationtestfurtherdemonstrationofreliabilityandvalidityasabriefmeasureofvisuospatialability
AT killgorewilliamds designorganizationtestfurtherdemonstrationofreliabilityandvalidityasabriefmeasureofvisuospatialability
AT gogelhannah designorganizationtestfurtherdemonstrationofreliabilityandvalidityasabriefmeasureofvisuospatialability