Cargando…

Comparison of Caffeine and d-amphetamine in Cocaine-Dependent Subjects: Differential Outcomes on Subjective and Cardiovascular Effects, Reward Learning, and Salivary Paraxanthine

Due to indirect modulation of dopamine transmission, adenosine receptor antagonists may be useful in either treating cocaine use or improving disrupted cognitive-behavioral functions associated with chronic cocaine use. To compare and contrast the stimulant effects of adenosine antagonism to direct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lane, Scott D, Green, Charles E, Schmitz, Joy M, Rathnayaka, Nuvan, Fang, Wendy B, Ferré, Sergi, Moeller, F Gerard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4235768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25414797
http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-6105.1000176
_version_ 1782345074357567488
author Lane, Scott D
Green, Charles E
Schmitz, Joy M
Rathnayaka, Nuvan
Fang, Wendy B
Ferré, Sergi
Moeller, F Gerard
author_facet Lane, Scott D
Green, Charles E
Schmitz, Joy M
Rathnayaka, Nuvan
Fang, Wendy B
Ferré, Sergi
Moeller, F Gerard
author_sort Lane, Scott D
collection PubMed
description Due to indirect modulation of dopamine transmission, adenosine receptor antagonists may be useful in either treating cocaine use or improving disrupted cognitive-behavioral functions associated with chronic cocaine use. To compare and contrast the stimulant effects of adenosine antagonism to direct dopamine stimulation, we administered 150 mg and 300 mg caffeine, 20 mg amphetamine, and placebo to cocaine-dependent vs. healthy control subjects, matched on moderate caffeine use. Data were obtained on measures of cardiovascular effects, subjective drug effects (ARCI, VAS, DEQ), and a probabilistic reward-learning task sensitive to dopamine modulation. Levels of salivary caffeine and the primary caffeine metabolite paraxanthine were obtained on placebo and caffeine dosing days. Cardiovascular results revealed main effects of dose for diastolic blood pressure and heart rate; follow up tests showed that controls were most sensitive to 300 mg caffeine and 20 mg amphetamine; cocaine-dependent subjects were sensitive only to 300 mg caffeine. Subjective effects results revealed dose × time and dose × group interactions on the ARCI A, ARCI LSD, and VAS ‘elated’ scales; follow up tests did not show systematic differences between groups with regard to caffeine or d-amphetamine. Large between-group differences in salivary paraxanthine (but not salivary caffeine) levels were obtained under both caffeine doses. The cocaine-dependent group expressed significantly higher paraxanthine levels than controls under 150 mg and 3–4 fold greater levels under 300 mg at 90 min and 150 min post caffeine dose. However, these differences also covaried with cigarette smoking status (not balanced between groups), and nicotine smoking is known to alter caffeine/paraxanthine metabolism via cytochrome P450 enzymes. These preliminary data raise the possibility that adenosine antagonists may affect cocaine-dependent and non-dependent subjects differently. In conjunction with previous preclinical and human studies, the data suggest that adenosine modulating drugs may have value in the treatment of stimulant use disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4235768
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42357682014-11-18 Comparison of Caffeine and d-amphetamine in Cocaine-Dependent Subjects: Differential Outcomes on Subjective and Cardiovascular Effects, Reward Learning, and Salivary Paraxanthine Lane, Scott D Green, Charles E Schmitz, Joy M Rathnayaka, Nuvan Fang, Wendy B Ferré, Sergi Moeller, F Gerard J Addict Res Ther Article Due to indirect modulation of dopamine transmission, adenosine receptor antagonists may be useful in either treating cocaine use or improving disrupted cognitive-behavioral functions associated with chronic cocaine use. To compare and contrast the stimulant effects of adenosine antagonism to direct dopamine stimulation, we administered 150 mg and 300 mg caffeine, 20 mg amphetamine, and placebo to cocaine-dependent vs. healthy control subjects, matched on moderate caffeine use. Data were obtained on measures of cardiovascular effects, subjective drug effects (ARCI, VAS, DEQ), and a probabilistic reward-learning task sensitive to dopamine modulation. Levels of salivary caffeine and the primary caffeine metabolite paraxanthine were obtained on placebo and caffeine dosing days. Cardiovascular results revealed main effects of dose for diastolic blood pressure and heart rate; follow up tests showed that controls were most sensitive to 300 mg caffeine and 20 mg amphetamine; cocaine-dependent subjects were sensitive only to 300 mg caffeine. Subjective effects results revealed dose × time and dose × group interactions on the ARCI A, ARCI LSD, and VAS ‘elated’ scales; follow up tests did not show systematic differences between groups with regard to caffeine or d-amphetamine. Large between-group differences in salivary paraxanthine (but not salivary caffeine) levels were obtained under both caffeine doses. The cocaine-dependent group expressed significantly higher paraxanthine levels than controls under 150 mg and 3–4 fold greater levels under 300 mg at 90 min and 150 min post caffeine dose. However, these differences also covaried with cigarette smoking status (not balanced between groups), and nicotine smoking is known to alter caffeine/paraxanthine metabolism via cytochrome P450 enzymes. These preliminary data raise the possibility that adenosine antagonists may affect cocaine-dependent and non-dependent subjects differently. In conjunction with previous preclinical and human studies, the data suggest that adenosine modulating drugs may have value in the treatment of stimulant use disorders. 2014-03-06 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4235768/ /pubmed/25414797 http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-6105.1000176 Text en Copyright: © 2014 Lane SD, et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Lane, Scott D
Green, Charles E
Schmitz, Joy M
Rathnayaka, Nuvan
Fang, Wendy B
Ferré, Sergi
Moeller, F Gerard
Comparison of Caffeine and d-amphetamine in Cocaine-Dependent Subjects: Differential Outcomes on Subjective and Cardiovascular Effects, Reward Learning, and Salivary Paraxanthine
title Comparison of Caffeine and d-amphetamine in Cocaine-Dependent Subjects: Differential Outcomes on Subjective and Cardiovascular Effects, Reward Learning, and Salivary Paraxanthine
title_full Comparison of Caffeine and d-amphetamine in Cocaine-Dependent Subjects: Differential Outcomes on Subjective and Cardiovascular Effects, Reward Learning, and Salivary Paraxanthine
title_fullStr Comparison of Caffeine and d-amphetamine in Cocaine-Dependent Subjects: Differential Outcomes on Subjective and Cardiovascular Effects, Reward Learning, and Salivary Paraxanthine
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Caffeine and d-amphetamine in Cocaine-Dependent Subjects: Differential Outcomes on Subjective and Cardiovascular Effects, Reward Learning, and Salivary Paraxanthine
title_short Comparison of Caffeine and d-amphetamine in Cocaine-Dependent Subjects: Differential Outcomes on Subjective and Cardiovascular Effects, Reward Learning, and Salivary Paraxanthine
title_sort comparison of caffeine and d-amphetamine in cocaine-dependent subjects: differential outcomes on subjective and cardiovascular effects, reward learning, and salivary paraxanthine
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4235768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25414797
http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-6105.1000176
work_keys_str_mv AT lanescottd comparisonofcaffeineanddamphetamineincocainedependentsubjectsdifferentialoutcomesonsubjectiveandcardiovasculareffectsrewardlearningandsalivaryparaxanthine
AT greencharlese comparisonofcaffeineanddamphetamineincocainedependentsubjectsdifferentialoutcomesonsubjectiveandcardiovasculareffectsrewardlearningandsalivaryparaxanthine
AT schmitzjoym comparisonofcaffeineanddamphetamineincocainedependentsubjectsdifferentialoutcomesonsubjectiveandcardiovasculareffectsrewardlearningandsalivaryparaxanthine
AT rathnayakanuvan comparisonofcaffeineanddamphetamineincocainedependentsubjectsdifferentialoutcomesonsubjectiveandcardiovasculareffectsrewardlearningandsalivaryparaxanthine
AT fangwendyb comparisonofcaffeineanddamphetamineincocainedependentsubjectsdifferentialoutcomesonsubjectiveandcardiovasculareffectsrewardlearningandsalivaryparaxanthine
AT ferresergi comparisonofcaffeineanddamphetamineincocainedependentsubjectsdifferentialoutcomesonsubjectiveandcardiovasculareffectsrewardlearningandsalivaryparaxanthine
AT moellerfgerard comparisonofcaffeineanddamphetamineincocainedependentsubjectsdifferentialoutcomesonsubjectiveandcardiovasculareffectsrewardlearningandsalivaryparaxanthine