Cargando…
Laparoscopic Removal of Migrated Intrauterine Device Embedded in Intestine
INTRODUCTION: The intrauterine device (IUD) is a popular family planning method worldwide. Some of the complications associated with insertion of an IUD are well described in the literature. The frequency of IUD perforation is estimated to be between 0.05 and 13 per 1000 insertions. There are many r...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4236077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25419105 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2014.00122 |
_version_ | 1782345099692212224 |
---|---|
author | Rahnemai-Azar, Amir A. Apfel, Tehilla Naghshizadian, Rozhin Cosgrove, John Morgan Farkas, Daniel T. |
author_facet | Rahnemai-Azar, Amir A. Apfel, Tehilla Naghshizadian, Rozhin Cosgrove, John Morgan Farkas, Daniel T. |
author_sort | Rahnemai-Azar, Amir A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The intrauterine device (IUD) is a popular family planning method worldwide. Some of the complications associated with insertion of an IUD are well described in the literature. The frequency of IUD perforation is estimated to be between 0.05 and 13 per 1000 insertions. There are many reports of migrated intrauterine devices, but far fewer reports of IUDs which have penetrated into the small intestine. CASE DESCRIPTION: Herein we report a case of perforated intrauterine device embedded in the small intestine. By using a wound protector retraction device, and fashioning the anastomosis extra-corporeally, we were able to more easily perform this laparoscopically. This left the patient with a quicker recovery, and a better cosmetic result. DISCUSSION: IUD perforation into the peritoneal cavity is a known complication, and necessitates close follow-up. Most, if not all, should be removed at the time of diagnosis. In the majority of previously reported cases, removal was done through laparotomy. Even in cases where removal was attempted laparoscopically, many were later converted to laparotomy. Surgeons should be aware of different techniques, including using a wound protector retraction device, in order to facilitate laparoscopic removal. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4236077 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42360772014-11-21 Laparoscopic Removal of Migrated Intrauterine Device Embedded in Intestine Rahnemai-Azar, Amir A. Apfel, Tehilla Naghshizadian, Rozhin Cosgrove, John Morgan Farkas, Daniel T. JSLS Case Reports INTRODUCTION: The intrauterine device (IUD) is a popular family planning method worldwide. Some of the complications associated with insertion of an IUD are well described in the literature. The frequency of IUD perforation is estimated to be between 0.05 and 13 per 1000 insertions. There are many reports of migrated intrauterine devices, but far fewer reports of IUDs which have penetrated into the small intestine. CASE DESCRIPTION: Herein we report a case of perforated intrauterine device embedded in the small intestine. By using a wound protector retraction device, and fashioning the anastomosis extra-corporeally, we were able to more easily perform this laparoscopically. This left the patient with a quicker recovery, and a better cosmetic result. DISCUSSION: IUD perforation into the peritoneal cavity is a known complication, and necessitates close follow-up. Most, if not all, should be removed at the time of diagnosis. In the majority of previously reported cases, removal was done through laparotomy. Even in cases where removal was attempted laparoscopically, many were later converted to laparotomy. Surgeons should be aware of different techniques, including using a wound protector retraction device, in order to facilitate laparoscopic removal. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4236077/ /pubmed/25419105 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2014.00122 Text en © 2014 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. |
spellingShingle | Case Reports Rahnemai-Azar, Amir A. Apfel, Tehilla Naghshizadian, Rozhin Cosgrove, John Morgan Farkas, Daniel T. Laparoscopic Removal of Migrated Intrauterine Device Embedded in Intestine |
title | Laparoscopic Removal of Migrated Intrauterine Device Embedded in Intestine |
title_full | Laparoscopic Removal of Migrated Intrauterine Device Embedded in Intestine |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic Removal of Migrated Intrauterine Device Embedded in Intestine |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic Removal of Migrated Intrauterine Device Embedded in Intestine |
title_short | Laparoscopic Removal of Migrated Intrauterine Device Embedded in Intestine |
title_sort | laparoscopic removal of migrated intrauterine device embedded in intestine |
topic | Case Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4236077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25419105 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2014.00122 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rahnemaiazaramira laparoscopicremovalofmigratedintrauterinedeviceembeddedinintestine AT apfeltehilla laparoscopicremovalofmigratedintrauterinedeviceembeddedinintestine AT naghshizadianrozhin laparoscopicremovalofmigratedintrauterinedeviceembeddedinintestine AT cosgrovejohnmorgan laparoscopicremovalofmigratedintrauterinedeviceembeddedinintestine AT farkasdanielt laparoscopicremovalofmigratedintrauterinedeviceembeddedinintestine |