Cargando…

Laparoscopic Removal of Migrated Intrauterine Device Embedded in Intestine

INTRODUCTION: The intrauterine device (IUD) is a popular family planning method worldwide. Some of the complications associated with insertion of an IUD are well described in the literature. The frequency of IUD perforation is estimated to be between 0.05 and 13 per 1000 insertions. There are many r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rahnemai-Azar, Amir A., Apfel, Tehilla, Naghshizadian, Rozhin, Cosgrove, John Morgan, Farkas, Daniel T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4236077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25419105
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2014.00122
_version_ 1782345099692212224
author Rahnemai-Azar, Amir A.
Apfel, Tehilla
Naghshizadian, Rozhin
Cosgrove, John Morgan
Farkas, Daniel T.
author_facet Rahnemai-Azar, Amir A.
Apfel, Tehilla
Naghshizadian, Rozhin
Cosgrove, John Morgan
Farkas, Daniel T.
author_sort Rahnemai-Azar, Amir A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The intrauterine device (IUD) is a popular family planning method worldwide. Some of the complications associated with insertion of an IUD are well described in the literature. The frequency of IUD perforation is estimated to be between 0.05 and 13 per 1000 insertions. There are many reports of migrated intrauterine devices, but far fewer reports of IUDs which have penetrated into the small intestine. CASE DESCRIPTION: Herein we report a case of perforated intrauterine device embedded in the small intestine. By using a wound protector retraction device, and fashioning the anastomosis extra-corporeally, we were able to more easily perform this laparoscopically. This left the patient with a quicker recovery, and a better cosmetic result. DISCUSSION: IUD perforation into the peritoneal cavity is a known complication, and necessitates close follow-up. Most, if not all, should be removed at the time of diagnosis. In the majority of previously reported cases, removal was done through laparotomy. Even in cases where removal was attempted laparoscopically, many were later converted to laparotomy. Surgeons should be aware of different techniques, including using a wound protector retraction device, in order to facilitate laparoscopic removal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4236077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42360772014-11-21 Laparoscopic Removal of Migrated Intrauterine Device Embedded in Intestine Rahnemai-Azar, Amir A. Apfel, Tehilla Naghshizadian, Rozhin Cosgrove, John Morgan Farkas, Daniel T. JSLS Case Reports INTRODUCTION: The intrauterine device (IUD) is a popular family planning method worldwide. Some of the complications associated with insertion of an IUD are well described in the literature. The frequency of IUD perforation is estimated to be between 0.05 and 13 per 1000 insertions. There are many reports of migrated intrauterine devices, but far fewer reports of IUDs which have penetrated into the small intestine. CASE DESCRIPTION: Herein we report a case of perforated intrauterine device embedded in the small intestine. By using a wound protector retraction device, and fashioning the anastomosis extra-corporeally, we were able to more easily perform this laparoscopically. This left the patient with a quicker recovery, and a better cosmetic result. DISCUSSION: IUD perforation into the peritoneal cavity is a known complication, and necessitates close follow-up. Most, if not all, should be removed at the time of diagnosis. In the majority of previously reported cases, removal was done through laparotomy. Even in cases where removal was attempted laparoscopically, many were later converted to laparotomy. Surgeons should be aware of different techniques, including using a wound protector retraction device, in order to facilitate laparoscopic removal. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4236077/ /pubmed/25419105 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2014.00122 Text en © 2014 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Case Reports
Rahnemai-Azar, Amir A.
Apfel, Tehilla
Naghshizadian, Rozhin
Cosgrove, John Morgan
Farkas, Daniel T.
Laparoscopic Removal of Migrated Intrauterine Device Embedded in Intestine
title Laparoscopic Removal of Migrated Intrauterine Device Embedded in Intestine
title_full Laparoscopic Removal of Migrated Intrauterine Device Embedded in Intestine
title_fullStr Laparoscopic Removal of Migrated Intrauterine Device Embedded in Intestine
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic Removal of Migrated Intrauterine Device Embedded in Intestine
title_short Laparoscopic Removal of Migrated Intrauterine Device Embedded in Intestine
title_sort laparoscopic removal of migrated intrauterine device embedded in intestine
topic Case Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4236077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25419105
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2014.00122
work_keys_str_mv AT rahnemaiazaramira laparoscopicremovalofmigratedintrauterinedeviceembeddedinintestine
AT apfeltehilla laparoscopicremovalofmigratedintrauterinedeviceembeddedinintestine
AT naghshizadianrozhin laparoscopicremovalofmigratedintrauterinedeviceembeddedinintestine
AT cosgrovejohnmorgan laparoscopicremovalofmigratedintrauterinedeviceembeddedinintestine
AT farkasdanielt laparoscopicremovalofmigratedintrauterinedeviceembeddedinintestine