Cargando…

A Barbed Suture Repair For Flexor Tendons: A Novel Technique With No Exposed Barbs

BACKGROUND: Barbed suture technology has shown promise in flexor tendon repairs, as there is an even distribution of load and the need for a knot is eliminated. We propose that a quick and simple, novel, barbed technique without any exposed barbs on the tendon surface has comparable strength and a s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joyce, Cormac W., Sugrue, Conor, Chan, Jeffrey C., Delgado, Luis, Zeugolis, Dimitrios, Carroll, Seam M., Kelly, Jack L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4236382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25426354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000203
_version_ 1782345153751547904
author Joyce, Cormac W.
Sugrue, Conor
Chan, Jeffrey C.
Delgado, Luis
Zeugolis, Dimitrios
Carroll, Seam M.
Kelly, Jack L.
author_facet Joyce, Cormac W.
Sugrue, Conor
Chan, Jeffrey C.
Delgado, Luis
Zeugolis, Dimitrios
Carroll, Seam M.
Kelly, Jack L.
author_sort Joyce, Cormac W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Barbed suture technology has shown promise in flexor tendon repairs, as there is an even distribution of load and the need for a knot is eliminated. We propose that a quick and simple, novel, barbed technique without any exposed barbs on the tendon surface has comparable strength and a smaller cross-sectional area at the repair site than traditional methods of repair. METHODS: Forty porcine flexor tendons were randomized to polybutester 4-strand barbed repair or to 4-strand Adelaide monofilament repair. The cross-sectional area was measured before and after repair. Biomechanical testing was carried out and 2-mm gap formation force, ultimate strength of repair, and method of failure were recorded. RESULTS: The mean ultimate strength of the barbed repairs was 54.51 ± 17.9 while that of the Adelaide repairs was 53.17 ± 16.35. The mean 2-mm gap formation force for the barbed group was 44.71 ± 17.86 whereas that of the Adelaide group was 20.25 ± 4.99. The postrepair percentage change in cross-sectional area at the repair site for the Adelaide group and barbed group was 12.0 ± 2.3 and 4.6 ± 2.8, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that a 4-strand knotless, barbed method attained comparable strength to that of the traditional Adelaide repair technique. The barbed method had a significantly reduced cross-sectional area at the repair site compared with the Adelaide group. The 2-mm gap formation force was less in the barbed group than the Adelaide group. Barbed repairs show promise for tendon repairs; this simple method warrants further study in an animal model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4236382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42363822014-11-25 A Barbed Suture Repair For Flexor Tendons: A Novel Technique With No Exposed Barbs Joyce, Cormac W. Sugrue, Conor Chan, Jeffrey C. Delgado, Luis Zeugolis, Dimitrios Carroll, Seam M. Kelly, Jack L. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Articles BACKGROUND: Barbed suture technology has shown promise in flexor tendon repairs, as there is an even distribution of load and the need for a knot is eliminated. We propose that a quick and simple, novel, barbed technique without any exposed barbs on the tendon surface has comparable strength and a smaller cross-sectional area at the repair site than traditional methods of repair. METHODS: Forty porcine flexor tendons were randomized to polybutester 4-strand barbed repair or to 4-strand Adelaide monofilament repair. The cross-sectional area was measured before and after repair. Biomechanical testing was carried out and 2-mm gap formation force, ultimate strength of repair, and method of failure were recorded. RESULTS: The mean ultimate strength of the barbed repairs was 54.51 ± 17.9 while that of the Adelaide repairs was 53.17 ± 16.35. The mean 2-mm gap formation force for the barbed group was 44.71 ± 17.86 whereas that of the Adelaide group was 20.25 ± 4.99. The postrepair percentage change in cross-sectional area at the repair site for the Adelaide group and barbed group was 12.0 ± 2.3 and 4.6 ± 2.8, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that a 4-strand knotless, barbed method attained comparable strength to that of the traditional Adelaide repair technique. The barbed method had a significantly reduced cross-sectional area at the repair site compared with the Adelaide group. The 2-mm gap formation force was less in the barbed group than the Adelaide group. Barbed repairs show promise for tendon repairs; this simple method warrants further study in an animal model. Wolters Kluwer Health 2014-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4236382/ /pubmed/25426354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000203 Text en Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. PRS Global Open is a publication of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Joyce, Cormac W.
Sugrue, Conor
Chan, Jeffrey C.
Delgado, Luis
Zeugolis, Dimitrios
Carroll, Seam M.
Kelly, Jack L.
A Barbed Suture Repair For Flexor Tendons: A Novel Technique With No Exposed Barbs
title A Barbed Suture Repair For Flexor Tendons: A Novel Technique With No Exposed Barbs
title_full A Barbed Suture Repair For Flexor Tendons: A Novel Technique With No Exposed Barbs
title_fullStr A Barbed Suture Repair For Flexor Tendons: A Novel Technique With No Exposed Barbs
title_full_unstemmed A Barbed Suture Repair For Flexor Tendons: A Novel Technique With No Exposed Barbs
title_short A Barbed Suture Repair For Flexor Tendons: A Novel Technique With No Exposed Barbs
title_sort barbed suture repair for flexor tendons: a novel technique with no exposed barbs
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4236382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25426354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000203
work_keys_str_mv AT joycecormacw abarbedsuturerepairforflexortendonsanoveltechniquewithnoexposedbarbs
AT sugrueconor abarbedsuturerepairforflexortendonsanoveltechniquewithnoexposedbarbs
AT chanjeffreyc abarbedsuturerepairforflexortendonsanoveltechniquewithnoexposedbarbs
AT delgadoluis abarbedsuturerepairforflexortendonsanoveltechniquewithnoexposedbarbs
AT zeugolisdimitrios abarbedsuturerepairforflexortendonsanoveltechniquewithnoexposedbarbs
AT carrollseamm abarbedsuturerepairforflexortendonsanoveltechniquewithnoexposedbarbs
AT kellyjackl abarbedsuturerepairforflexortendonsanoveltechniquewithnoexposedbarbs
AT joycecormacw barbedsuturerepairforflexortendonsanoveltechniquewithnoexposedbarbs
AT sugrueconor barbedsuturerepairforflexortendonsanoveltechniquewithnoexposedbarbs
AT chanjeffreyc barbedsuturerepairforflexortendonsanoveltechniquewithnoexposedbarbs
AT delgadoluis barbedsuturerepairforflexortendonsanoveltechniquewithnoexposedbarbs
AT zeugolisdimitrios barbedsuturerepairforflexortendonsanoveltechniquewithnoexposedbarbs
AT carrollseamm barbedsuturerepairforflexortendonsanoveltechniquewithnoexposedbarbs
AT kellyjackl barbedsuturerepairforflexortendonsanoveltechniquewithnoexposedbarbs