Cargando…
A Barbed Suture Repair For Flexor Tendons: A Novel Technique With No Exposed Barbs
BACKGROUND: Barbed suture technology has shown promise in flexor tendon repairs, as there is an even distribution of load and the need for a knot is eliminated. We propose that a quick and simple, novel, barbed technique without any exposed barbs on the tendon surface has comparable strength and a s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4236382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25426354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000203 |
_version_ | 1782345153751547904 |
---|---|
author | Joyce, Cormac W. Sugrue, Conor Chan, Jeffrey C. Delgado, Luis Zeugolis, Dimitrios Carroll, Seam M. Kelly, Jack L. |
author_facet | Joyce, Cormac W. Sugrue, Conor Chan, Jeffrey C. Delgado, Luis Zeugolis, Dimitrios Carroll, Seam M. Kelly, Jack L. |
author_sort | Joyce, Cormac W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Barbed suture technology has shown promise in flexor tendon repairs, as there is an even distribution of load and the need for a knot is eliminated. We propose that a quick and simple, novel, barbed technique without any exposed barbs on the tendon surface has comparable strength and a smaller cross-sectional area at the repair site than traditional methods of repair. METHODS: Forty porcine flexor tendons were randomized to polybutester 4-strand barbed repair or to 4-strand Adelaide monofilament repair. The cross-sectional area was measured before and after repair. Biomechanical testing was carried out and 2-mm gap formation force, ultimate strength of repair, and method of failure were recorded. RESULTS: The mean ultimate strength of the barbed repairs was 54.51 ± 17.9 while that of the Adelaide repairs was 53.17 ± 16.35. The mean 2-mm gap formation force for the barbed group was 44.71 ± 17.86 whereas that of the Adelaide group was 20.25 ± 4.99. The postrepair percentage change in cross-sectional area at the repair site for the Adelaide group and barbed group was 12.0 ± 2.3 and 4.6 ± 2.8, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that a 4-strand knotless, barbed method attained comparable strength to that of the traditional Adelaide repair technique. The barbed method had a significantly reduced cross-sectional area at the repair site compared with the Adelaide group. The 2-mm gap formation force was less in the barbed group than the Adelaide group. Barbed repairs show promise for tendon repairs; this simple method warrants further study in an animal model. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4236382 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42363822014-11-25 A Barbed Suture Repair For Flexor Tendons: A Novel Technique With No Exposed Barbs Joyce, Cormac W. Sugrue, Conor Chan, Jeffrey C. Delgado, Luis Zeugolis, Dimitrios Carroll, Seam M. Kelly, Jack L. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Articles BACKGROUND: Barbed suture technology has shown promise in flexor tendon repairs, as there is an even distribution of load and the need for a knot is eliminated. We propose that a quick and simple, novel, barbed technique without any exposed barbs on the tendon surface has comparable strength and a smaller cross-sectional area at the repair site than traditional methods of repair. METHODS: Forty porcine flexor tendons were randomized to polybutester 4-strand barbed repair or to 4-strand Adelaide monofilament repair. The cross-sectional area was measured before and after repair. Biomechanical testing was carried out and 2-mm gap formation force, ultimate strength of repair, and method of failure were recorded. RESULTS: The mean ultimate strength of the barbed repairs was 54.51 ± 17.9 while that of the Adelaide repairs was 53.17 ± 16.35. The mean 2-mm gap formation force for the barbed group was 44.71 ± 17.86 whereas that of the Adelaide group was 20.25 ± 4.99. The postrepair percentage change in cross-sectional area at the repair site for the Adelaide group and barbed group was 12.0 ± 2.3 and 4.6 ± 2.8, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that a 4-strand knotless, barbed method attained comparable strength to that of the traditional Adelaide repair technique. The barbed method had a significantly reduced cross-sectional area at the repair site compared with the Adelaide group. The 2-mm gap formation force was less in the barbed group than the Adelaide group. Barbed repairs show promise for tendon repairs; this simple method warrants further study in an animal model. Wolters Kluwer Health 2014-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4236382/ /pubmed/25426354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000203 Text en Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. PRS Global Open is a publication of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Joyce, Cormac W. Sugrue, Conor Chan, Jeffrey C. Delgado, Luis Zeugolis, Dimitrios Carroll, Seam M. Kelly, Jack L. A Barbed Suture Repair For Flexor Tendons: A Novel Technique With No Exposed Barbs |
title | A Barbed Suture Repair For Flexor Tendons: A Novel Technique With No Exposed Barbs |
title_full | A Barbed Suture Repair For Flexor Tendons: A Novel Technique With No Exposed Barbs |
title_fullStr | A Barbed Suture Repair For Flexor Tendons: A Novel Technique With No Exposed Barbs |
title_full_unstemmed | A Barbed Suture Repair For Flexor Tendons: A Novel Technique With No Exposed Barbs |
title_short | A Barbed Suture Repair For Flexor Tendons: A Novel Technique With No Exposed Barbs |
title_sort | barbed suture repair for flexor tendons: a novel technique with no exposed barbs |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4236382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25426354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000203 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joycecormacw abarbedsuturerepairforflexortendonsanoveltechniquewithnoexposedbarbs AT sugrueconor abarbedsuturerepairforflexortendonsanoveltechniquewithnoexposedbarbs AT chanjeffreyc abarbedsuturerepairforflexortendonsanoveltechniquewithnoexposedbarbs AT delgadoluis abarbedsuturerepairforflexortendonsanoveltechniquewithnoexposedbarbs AT zeugolisdimitrios abarbedsuturerepairforflexortendonsanoveltechniquewithnoexposedbarbs AT carrollseamm abarbedsuturerepairforflexortendonsanoveltechniquewithnoexposedbarbs AT kellyjackl abarbedsuturerepairforflexortendonsanoveltechniquewithnoexposedbarbs AT joycecormacw barbedsuturerepairforflexortendonsanoveltechniquewithnoexposedbarbs AT sugrueconor barbedsuturerepairforflexortendonsanoveltechniquewithnoexposedbarbs AT chanjeffreyc barbedsuturerepairforflexortendonsanoveltechniquewithnoexposedbarbs AT delgadoluis barbedsuturerepairforflexortendonsanoveltechniquewithnoexposedbarbs AT zeugolisdimitrios barbedsuturerepairforflexortendonsanoveltechniquewithnoexposedbarbs AT carrollseamm barbedsuturerepairforflexortendonsanoveltechniquewithnoexposedbarbs AT kellyjackl barbedsuturerepairforflexortendonsanoveltechniquewithnoexposedbarbs |