Cargando…

Perceptions of primary care in Korea: a comparison of patient and physician focus group discussions

BACKGROUND: The primary care system in the Republic of Korea has weakened over the past decade and is now in poorer condition than the systems in other countries. However, little is known about how the two key players, patients and physicians, view the current status of primary care in Korea. This s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ock, Minsu, Kim, Jung-Eun, Jo, Min-Woo, Lee, Hyeon-Jeong, Kim, Hyun Joo, Lee, Jin Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4236417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25358391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-014-0178-5
_version_ 1782345157419466752
author Ock, Minsu
Kim, Jung-Eun
Jo, Min-Woo
Lee, Hyeon-Jeong
Kim, Hyun Joo
Lee, Jin Yong
author_facet Ock, Minsu
Kim, Jung-Eun
Jo, Min-Woo
Lee, Hyeon-Jeong
Kim, Hyun Joo
Lee, Jin Yong
author_sort Ock, Minsu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The primary care system in the Republic of Korea has weakened over the past decade and is now in poorer condition than the systems in other countries. However, little is known about how the two key players, patients and physicians, view the current status of primary care in Korea. This study aims to understand what problems they perceive in respect to the key components of primary care. METHODS: We conducted two focus groups; one with six patients and the other with six physicians. We designed and modified the guidelines for each focus group discussion through repeated review and discussion among all authors and then we conducted the groups with a professional interviewer at Gallup Korea. After the focus groups we analyzed the verbatim transcriptions to identify specific meanings and potential implications. RESULTS: From the study we identified that the patients and physicians did not have a correct understanding about the role of primary care. We also identified a significant discrepancy between their perception of primary care. In particular, the patient group perceived the quality of primary care to be poor and unsatisfactory while the physician group perceived the quality of primary care to be better in Korea than in other countries. CONCLUSIONS: The focus group discussions revealed that such discrepancies in perception have resulted from Korea’s distorted healthcare delivery system, undifferentiated roles among healthcare organizations, patients’ freedom of choice in selecting healthcare providers and other institutional factors. There are several steps that should be taken to promote primary care in Korea. First, we should undertake efforts to improve the quality of primary care provided by physicians. Second, we should inform the general public about using clinics instead of hospitals for the treatment of simple or minor diseases. Third, we should introduce a new compensation scheme to compensate physicians for services related to health education, disease prevention, behavioral change and nutrition consultation. Finally, we should provide additional reimbursement so that primary care physicians can extend their office hours to better meet the needs of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4236417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42364172014-11-19 Perceptions of primary care in Korea: a comparison of patient and physician focus group discussions Ock, Minsu Kim, Jung-Eun Jo, Min-Woo Lee, Hyeon-Jeong Kim, Hyun Joo Lee, Jin Yong BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: The primary care system in the Republic of Korea has weakened over the past decade and is now in poorer condition than the systems in other countries. However, little is known about how the two key players, patients and physicians, view the current status of primary care in Korea. This study aims to understand what problems they perceive in respect to the key components of primary care. METHODS: We conducted two focus groups; one with six patients and the other with six physicians. We designed and modified the guidelines for each focus group discussion through repeated review and discussion among all authors and then we conducted the groups with a professional interviewer at Gallup Korea. After the focus groups we analyzed the verbatim transcriptions to identify specific meanings and potential implications. RESULTS: From the study we identified that the patients and physicians did not have a correct understanding about the role of primary care. We also identified a significant discrepancy between their perception of primary care. In particular, the patient group perceived the quality of primary care to be poor and unsatisfactory while the physician group perceived the quality of primary care to be better in Korea than in other countries. CONCLUSIONS: The focus group discussions revealed that such discrepancies in perception have resulted from Korea’s distorted healthcare delivery system, undifferentiated roles among healthcare organizations, patients’ freedom of choice in selecting healthcare providers and other institutional factors. There are several steps that should be taken to promote primary care in Korea. First, we should undertake efforts to improve the quality of primary care provided by physicians. Second, we should inform the general public about using clinics instead of hospitals for the treatment of simple or minor diseases. Third, we should introduce a new compensation scheme to compensate physicians for services related to health education, disease prevention, behavioral change and nutrition consultation. Finally, we should provide additional reimbursement so that primary care physicians can extend their office hours to better meet the needs of patients. BioMed Central 2014-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4236417/ /pubmed/25358391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-014-0178-5 Text en © Ock et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ock, Minsu
Kim, Jung-Eun
Jo, Min-Woo
Lee, Hyeon-Jeong
Kim, Hyun Joo
Lee, Jin Yong
Perceptions of primary care in Korea: a comparison of patient and physician focus group discussions
title Perceptions of primary care in Korea: a comparison of patient and physician focus group discussions
title_full Perceptions of primary care in Korea: a comparison of patient and physician focus group discussions
title_fullStr Perceptions of primary care in Korea: a comparison of patient and physician focus group discussions
title_full_unstemmed Perceptions of primary care in Korea: a comparison of patient and physician focus group discussions
title_short Perceptions of primary care in Korea: a comparison of patient and physician focus group discussions
title_sort perceptions of primary care in korea: a comparison of patient and physician focus group discussions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4236417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25358391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-014-0178-5
work_keys_str_mv AT ockminsu perceptionsofprimarycareinkoreaacomparisonofpatientandphysicianfocusgroupdiscussions
AT kimjungeun perceptionsofprimarycareinkoreaacomparisonofpatientandphysicianfocusgroupdiscussions
AT jominwoo perceptionsofprimarycareinkoreaacomparisonofpatientandphysicianfocusgroupdiscussions
AT leehyeonjeong perceptionsofprimarycareinkoreaacomparisonofpatientandphysicianfocusgroupdiscussions
AT kimhyunjoo perceptionsofprimarycareinkoreaacomparisonofpatientandphysicianfocusgroupdiscussions
AT leejinyong perceptionsofprimarycareinkoreaacomparisonofpatientandphysicianfocusgroupdiscussions