Cargando…

Treatment and prophylaxis of melioidosis

Melioidosis, infection with Burkholderia pseudomallei, is being recognised with increasing frequency and is probably more common than currently appreciated. Treatment recommendations are based on a series of clinical trials conducted in Thailand over the past 25 years. Treatment is usually divided i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Dance, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science Publishers 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4236584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24613038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.01.005
_version_ 1782345195542544384
author Dance, David
author_facet Dance, David
author_sort Dance, David
collection PubMed
description Melioidosis, infection with Burkholderia pseudomallei, is being recognised with increasing frequency and is probably more common than currently appreciated. Treatment recommendations are based on a series of clinical trials conducted in Thailand over the past 25 years. Treatment is usually divided into two phases: in the first, or acute phase, parenteral drugs are given for ≥10 days with the aim of preventing death from overwhelming sepsis; in the second, or eradication phase, oral drugs are given, usually to complete a total of 20 weeks, with the aim of preventing relapse. Specific treatment for individual patients needs to be tailored according to clinical manifestations and response, and there remain many unanswered questions. Some patients with very mild infections can probably be cured by oral agents alone. Ceftazidime is the mainstay of acute-phase treatment, with carbapenems reserved for severe infections or treatment failures and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (co-amoxiclav) as second-line therapy. Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (co-trimoxazole) is preferred for the eradication phase, with the alternative of co-amoxiclav. In addition, the best available supportive care is needed, along with drainage of abscesses whenever possible. Treatment for melioidosis is unaffordable for many in endemic areas of the developing world, but the relative costs have reduced over the past decade. Unfortunately there is no likelihood of any new or cheaper options becoming available in the immediate future. Recommendations for prophylaxis following exposure to B. pseudomallei have been made, but the evidence suggests that they would probably only delay rather than prevent the development of infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4236584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Elsevier Science Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42365842014-11-25 Treatment and prophylaxis of melioidosis Dance, David Int J Antimicrob Agents Review Melioidosis, infection with Burkholderia pseudomallei, is being recognised with increasing frequency and is probably more common than currently appreciated. Treatment recommendations are based on a series of clinical trials conducted in Thailand over the past 25 years. Treatment is usually divided into two phases: in the first, or acute phase, parenteral drugs are given for ≥10 days with the aim of preventing death from overwhelming sepsis; in the second, or eradication phase, oral drugs are given, usually to complete a total of 20 weeks, with the aim of preventing relapse. Specific treatment for individual patients needs to be tailored according to clinical manifestations and response, and there remain many unanswered questions. Some patients with very mild infections can probably be cured by oral agents alone. Ceftazidime is the mainstay of acute-phase treatment, with carbapenems reserved for severe infections or treatment failures and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (co-amoxiclav) as second-line therapy. Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (co-trimoxazole) is preferred for the eradication phase, with the alternative of co-amoxiclav. In addition, the best available supportive care is needed, along with drainage of abscesses whenever possible. Treatment for melioidosis is unaffordable for many in endemic areas of the developing world, but the relative costs have reduced over the past decade. Unfortunately there is no likelihood of any new or cheaper options becoming available in the immediate future. Recommendations for prophylaxis following exposure to B. pseudomallei have been made, but the evidence suggests that they would probably only delay rather than prevent the development of infection. Elsevier Science Publishers 2014-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4236584/ /pubmed/24613038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.01.005 Text en © 2014 The Author https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Dance, David
Treatment and prophylaxis of melioidosis
title Treatment and prophylaxis of melioidosis
title_full Treatment and prophylaxis of melioidosis
title_fullStr Treatment and prophylaxis of melioidosis
title_full_unstemmed Treatment and prophylaxis of melioidosis
title_short Treatment and prophylaxis of melioidosis
title_sort treatment and prophylaxis of melioidosis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4236584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24613038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.01.005
work_keys_str_mv AT dancedavid treatmentandprophylaxisofmelioidosis