Cargando…

How readable are Australian paediatric oral health education materials?

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to analyse the readability of paediatric oral health education leaflets available in Australia. METHODS: Forty paediatric oral health education materials were analysed for general readability according to the following parameters: Thoroughness; Textual fra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arora, Amit, Lam, Andy SF, Karami, Zahra, Do, Loc Giang, Harris, Mark Fort
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4236645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25183234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-111
_version_ 1782345209225412608
author Arora, Amit
Lam, Andy SF
Karami, Zahra
Do, Loc Giang
Harris, Mark Fort
author_facet Arora, Amit
Lam, Andy SF
Karami, Zahra
Do, Loc Giang
Harris, Mark Fort
author_sort Arora, Amit
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to analyse the readability of paediatric oral health education leaflets available in Australia. METHODS: Forty paediatric oral health education materials were analysed for general readability according to the following parameters: Thoroughness; Textual framework; Terminology; and Readability (Flesch-Kincaid grade level (FKGL), Gunning Fog index (Fog) and Simplified Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG)). RESULTS: Leaflets produced by the industry were among the hardest to read with an average readability at the 8th grade (8.4 ± 0.1). The readability of leaflets produced by the commercial sector was at the 7th grade (7.1 ± 1.7) and the government at the 6th grade (6.3 ± 1.9). The FKGL consistently yielded readabilities 2 grades below the Fog and SMOG indexes. In the content analyses, 14 essential paediatric oral health topics were noted and Early Childhood Caries (ECC) was identified as the most commonly used jargon term. CONCLUSION: Paediatric oral health education materials are readily available, yet their quality and readability vary widely and may be difficult to read for disadvantaged populations in Australia. A redesign of these leaflets while taking literacy into consideration is suggested.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4236645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42366452014-11-19 How readable are Australian paediatric oral health education materials? Arora, Amit Lam, Andy SF Karami, Zahra Do, Loc Giang Harris, Mark Fort BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to analyse the readability of paediatric oral health education leaflets available in Australia. METHODS: Forty paediatric oral health education materials were analysed for general readability according to the following parameters: Thoroughness; Textual framework; Terminology; and Readability (Flesch-Kincaid grade level (FKGL), Gunning Fog index (Fog) and Simplified Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG)). RESULTS: Leaflets produced by the industry were among the hardest to read with an average readability at the 8th grade (8.4 ± 0.1). The readability of leaflets produced by the commercial sector was at the 7th grade (7.1 ± 1.7) and the government at the 6th grade (6.3 ± 1.9). The FKGL consistently yielded readabilities 2 grades below the Fog and SMOG indexes. In the content analyses, 14 essential paediatric oral health topics were noted and Early Childhood Caries (ECC) was identified as the most commonly used jargon term. CONCLUSION: Paediatric oral health education materials are readily available, yet their quality and readability vary widely and may be difficult to read for disadvantaged populations in Australia. A redesign of these leaflets while taking literacy into consideration is suggested. BioMed Central 2014-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4236645/ /pubmed/25183234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-111 Text en Copyright © 2014 Arora et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Arora, Amit
Lam, Andy SF
Karami, Zahra
Do, Loc Giang
Harris, Mark Fort
How readable are Australian paediatric oral health education materials?
title How readable are Australian paediatric oral health education materials?
title_full How readable are Australian paediatric oral health education materials?
title_fullStr How readable are Australian paediatric oral health education materials?
title_full_unstemmed How readable are Australian paediatric oral health education materials?
title_short How readable are Australian paediatric oral health education materials?
title_sort how readable are australian paediatric oral health education materials?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4236645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25183234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-111
work_keys_str_mv AT aroraamit howreadableareaustralianpaediatricoralhealtheducationmaterials
AT lamandysf howreadableareaustralianpaediatricoralhealtheducationmaterials
AT karamizahra howreadableareaustralianpaediatricoralhealtheducationmaterials
AT dolocgiang howreadableareaustralianpaediatricoralhealtheducationmaterials
AT harrismarkfort howreadableareaustralianpaediatricoralhealtheducationmaterials