Cargando…

Are there benefits of social overinclusion? Behavioral and ERP effects in the Cyberball paradigm

Social participation can be examined using the Cyberball paradigm, a virtual ball-tossing game. Reducing the involvement of the participant is supposed to activate a neural alarm system, and to threaten fundamental social needs. Our previous findings indicate that the latter process can be linked to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niedeggen, Michael, Sarauli, Natia, Cacciola, Santi, Weschke, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4237054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25477807
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00935
_version_ 1782345284903239680
author Niedeggen, Michael
Sarauli, Natia
Cacciola, Santi
Weschke, Sarah
author_facet Niedeggen, Michael
Sarauli, Natia
Cacciola, Santi
Weschke, Sarah
author_sort Niedeggen, Michael
collection PubMed
description Social participation can be examined using the Cyberball paradigm, a virtual ball-tossing game. Reducing the involvement of the participant is supposed to activate a neural alarm system, and to threaten fundamental social needs. Our previous findings indicate that the latter process can be linked to an enhancement of the centro-parietal P3 amplitude, signaling a modulation of the subjective expectancy of involvement. A preceding more frontal ERP component, the P2, does not depend of the probability of involvement, but reflects the appraisal of social reward. In this experiment, we examined whether overinclusion of participants enhances the satisfaction of social needs, reduces the P3 amplitude correspondingly, and affects central reward processing. In the control condition, participants (n = 40) were included (two co-player, ball possession 33%), and overincluded (ball possession 46%) in the experimental condition. In a counterbalanced design, we also controlled for the order of conditions. As predicted, overinclusion increased the satisfaction of social needs, with exception of “self esteem”, and reduced the P3 amplitude. As for the frontal P2, overinclusion only enhanced the amplitudes if the less frequent involvement (condition: inclusion) was experienced previously. The behavioral and P3 data suggest that the feelings of social belonging, meaningful existence, and control are related to the subjective expectancy of social involvement, and can be described in terms of a linear continuum ranging from exclusion to overinclusion. In contrast, appraisal of social rewards does not depend on the probability of involvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4237054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42370542014-12-04 Are there benefits of social overinclusion? Behavioral and ERP effects in the Cyberball paradigm Niedeggen, Michael Sarauli, Natia Cacciola, Santi Weschke, Sarah Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Social participation can be examined using the Cyberball paradigm, a virtual ball-tossing game. Reducing the involvement of the participant is supposed to activate a neural alarm system, and to threaten fundamental social needs. Our previous findings indicate that the latter process can be linked to an enhancement of the centro-parietal P3 amplitude, signaling a modulation of the subjective expectancy of involvement. A preceding more frontal ERP component, the P2, does not depend of the probability of involvement, but reflects the appraisal of social reward. In this experiment, we examined whether overinclusion of participants enhances the satisfaction of social needs, reduces the P3 amplitude correspondingly, and affects central reward processing. In the control condition, participants (n = 40) were included (two co-player, ball possession 33%), and overincluded (ball possession 46%) in the experimental condition. In a counterbalanced design, we also controlled for the order of conditions. As predicted, overinclusion increased the satisfaction of social needs, with exception of “self esteem”, and reduced the P3 amplitude. As for the frontal P2, overinclusion only enhanced the amplitudes if the less frequent involvement (condition: inclusion) was experienced previously. The behavioral and P3 data suggest that the feelings of social belonging, meaningful existence, and control are related to the subjective expectancy of social involvement, and can be described in terms of a linear continuum ranging from exclusion to overinclusion. In contrast, appraisal of social rewards does not depend on the probability of involvement. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4237054/ /pubmed/25477807 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00935 Text en Copyright © 2014 Niedeggen, Sarauli, Cacciola and Weschke. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution and reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Niedeggen, Michael
Sarauli, Natia
Cacciola, Santi
Weschke, Sarah
Are there benefits of social overinclusion? Behavioral and ERP effects in the Cyberball paradigm
title Are there benefits of social overinclusion? Behavioral and ERP effects in the Cyberball paradigm
title_full Are there benefits of social overinclusion? Behavioral and ERP effects in the Cyberball paradigm
title_fullStr Are there benefits of social overinclusion? Behavioral and ERP effects in the Cyberball paradigm
title_full_unstemmed Are there benefits of social overinclusion? Behavioral and ERP effects in the Cyberball paradigm
title_short Are there benefits of social overinclusion? Behavioral and ERP effects in the Cyberball paradigm
title_sort are there benefits of social overinclusion? behavioral and erp effects in the cyberball paradigm
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4237054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25477807
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00935
work_keys_str_mv AT niedeggenmichael aretherebenefitsofsocialoverinclusionbehavioralanderpeffectsinthecyberballparadigm
AT saraulinatia aretherebenefitsofsocialoverinclusionbehavioralanderpeffectsinthecyberballparadigm
AT cacciolasanti aretherebenefitsofsocialoverinclusionbehavioralanderpeffectsinthecyberballparadigm
AT weschkesarah aretherebenefitsofsocialoverinclusionbehavioralanderpeffectsinthecyberballparadigm