Cargando…

Continuous spinal anaesthesia versus ultrasound-guided combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block for hip replacement surgery in elderly high-risk patients: a prospective randomised study

BACKGROUND: Our aim is to compare the hemodynamic effects of combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block (PCSNB) with continuous spinal anaesthesia (CSA) in elderly high-risk patients undergoing hip replacement surgery. METHODS: Seventy patients over the age of 60 with ASA III or IV physical stat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aksoy, Mehmet, Dostbil, Aysenur, Ince, Ilker, Ahiskalioglu, Ali, Alici, Hacı Ahmet, Aydin, Ali, Kilinc, Osman Ozgur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4237736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25414593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-99
_version_ 1782345383995768832
author Aksoy, Mehmet
Dostbil, Aysenur
Ince, Ilker
Ahiskalioglu, Ali
Alici, Hacı Ahmet
Aydin, Ali
Kilinc, Osman Ozgur
author_facet Aksoy, Mehmet
Dostbil, Aysenur
Ince, Ilker
Ahiskalioglu, Ali
Alici, Hacı Ahmet
Aydin, Ali
Kilinc, Osman Ozgur
author_sort Aksoy, Mehmet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Our aim is to compare the hemodynamic effects of combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block (PCSNB) with continuous spinal anaesthesia (CSA) in elderly high-risk patients undergoing hip replacement surgery. METHODS: Seventy patients over the age of 60 with ASA III or IV physical status were randomly allocated to two groups: In the PCSNB group, ultrasound-guided psoas compartment block was performed with modified Winnie technique using 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200.000 epinephrine (5 μgr/mL) and iliac crest block was performed using the same local anaesthetic solution (5 mL). All patients in the PCSNB group needed continuing infusion of propofol (2 mg/kg/h) during operation. In the CSA group, CSA was performed in the L(3)-L(4) interspaced with the patient in lateral decubitus position using 2.5 mg of isobaric bupivacaine 0.5%. When sensory block was not reached to the level of T(12) within 10 minutes in the CSA group, additional 2.5 mg of isobaric bupivacaine 0.5% was administered through the catheter at 5-min intervals by limiting the total dose of 15 mg until a T(12) level of the sensory block was achieved. RESULTS: The PCSNB group had significantly higher mean arterial blood pressure values at the beginning of surgery and at 5(th), 10(th) and 20(th) minutes of surgery compared to the CSA group (P =0.038, P =0.029, P =0.012, P =0.009 respectively). There were no significant differences between groups in terms of heart rate and peripheral oxygen saturation values during surgery and the postoperative period (P >0.05). Arterial hypotension required ephedrine was observed in 13 patients in the CSA and 4 patients in the PCSNB group (P =0.012). CONCLUSIONS: CSA and PCSNB produce satisfactory quality of anaesthesia in elderly high-risk patients with fewer hemodynamic changes in PCSNB cases compared with CSA cases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12614000658617, Registered 24 June 2014.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4237736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42377362014-11-21 Continuous spinal anaesthesia versus ultrasound-guided combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block for hip replacement surgery in elderly high-risk patients: a prospective randomised study Aksoy, Mehmet Dostbil, Aysenur Ince, Ilker Ahiskalioglu, Ali Alici, Hacı Ahmet Aydin, Ali Kilinc, Osman Ozgur BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Our aim is to compare the hemodynamic effects of combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block (PCSNB) with continuous spinal anaesthesia (CSA) in elderly high-risk patients undergoing hip replacement surgery. METHODS: Seventy patients over the age of 60 with ASA III or IV physical status were randomly allocated to two groups: In the PCSNB group, ultrasound-guided psoas compartment block was performed with modified Winnie technique using 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200.000 epinephrine (5 μgr/mL) and iliac crest block was performed using the same local anaesthetic solution (5 mL). All patients in the PCSNB group needed continuing infusion of propofol (2 mg/kg/h) during operation. In the CSA group, CSA was performed in the L(3)-L(4) interspaced with the patient in lateral decubitus position using 2.5 mg of isobaric bupivacaine 0.5%. When sensory block was not reached to the level of T(12) within 10 minutes in the CSA group, additional 2.5 mg of isobaric bupivacaine 0.5% was administered through the catheter at 5-min intervals by limiting the total dose of 15 mg until a T(12) level of the sensory block was achieved. RESULTS: The PCSNB group had significantly higher mean arterial blood pressure values at the beginning of surgery and at 5(th), 10(th) and 20(th) minutes of surgery compared to the CSA group (P =0.038, P =0.029, P =0.012, P =0.009 respectively). There were no significant differences between groups in terms of heart rate and peripheral oxygen saturation values during surgery and the postoperative period (P >0.05). Arterial hypotension required ephedrine was observed in 13 patients in the CSA and 4 patients in the PCSNB group (P =0.012). CONCLUSIONS: CSA and PCSNB produce satisfactory quality of anaesthesia in elderly high-risk patients with fewer hemodynamic changes in PCSNB cases compared with CSA cases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12614000658617, Registered 24 June 2014. BioMed Central 2014-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4237736/ /pubmed/25414593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-99 Text en © Aksoy et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Aksoy, Mehmet
Dostbil, Aysenur
Ince, Ilker
Ahiskalioglu, Ali
Alici, Hacı Ahmet
Aydin, Ali
Kilinc, Osman Ozgur
Continuous spinal anaesthesia versus ultrasound-guided combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block for hip replacement surgery in elderly high-risk patients: a prospective randomised study
title Continuous spinal anaesthesia versus ultrasound-guided combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block for hip replacement surgery in elderly high-risk patients: a prospective randomised study
title_full Continuous spinal anaesthesia versus ultrasound-guided combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block for hip replacement surgery in elderly high-risk patients: a prospective randomised study
title_fullStr Continuous spinal anaesthesia versus ultrasound-guided combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block for hip replacement surgery in elderly high-risk patients: a prospective randomised study
title_full_unstemmed Continuous spinal anaesthesia versus ultrasound-guided combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block for hip replacement surgery in elderly high-risk patients: a prospective randomised study
title_short Continuous spinal anaesthesia versus ultrasound-guided combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block for hip replacement surgery in elderly high-risk patients: a prospective randomised study
title_sort continuous spinal anaesthesia versus ultrasound-guided combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block for hip replacement surgery in elderly high-risk patients: a prospective randomised study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4237736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25414593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-99
work_keys_str_mv AT aksoymehmet continuousspinalanaesthesiaversusultrasoundguidedcombinedpsoascompartmentsciaticnerveblockforhipreplacementsurgeryinelderlyhighriskpatientsaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT dostbilaysenur continuousspinalanaesthesiaversusultrasoundguidedcombinedpsoascompartmentsciaticnerveblockforhipreplacementsurgeryinelderlyhighriskpatientsaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT inceilker continuousspinalanaesthesiaversusultrasoundguidedcombinedpsoascompartmentsciaticnerveblockforhipreplacementsurgeryinelderlyhighriskpatientsaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT ahiskaliogluali continuousspinalanaesthesiaversusultrasoundguidedcombinedpsoascompartmentsciaticnerveblockforhipreplacementsurgeryinelderlyhighriskpatientsaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT alicihacıahmet continuousspinalanaesthesiaversusultrasoundguidedcombinedpsoascompartmentsciaticnerveblockforhipreplacementsurgeryinelderlyhighriskpatientsaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT aydinali continuousspinalanaesthesiaversusultrasoundguidedcombinedpsoascompartmentsciaticnerveblockforhipreplacementsurgeryinelderlyhighriskpatientsaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT kilincosmanozgur continuousspinalanaesthesiaversusultrasoundguidedcombinedpsoascompartmentsciaticnerveblockforhipreplacementsurgeryinelderlyhighriskpatientsaprospectiverandomisedstudy