Cargando…
Continuous spinal anaesthesia versus ultrasound-guided combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block for hip replacement surgery in elderly high-risk patients: a prospective randomised study
BACKGROUND: Our aim is to compare the hemodynamic effects of combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block (PCSNB) with continuous spinal anaesthesia (CSA) in elderly high-risk patients undergoing hip replacement surgery. METHODS: Seventy patients over the age of 60 with ASA III or IV physical stat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4237736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25414593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-99 |
_version_ | 1782345383995768832 |
---|---|
author | Aksoy, Mehmet Dostbil, Aysenur Ince, Ilker Ahiskalioglu, Ali Alici, Hacı Ahmet Aydin, Ali Kilinc, Osman Ozgur |
author_facet | Aksoy, Mehmet Dostbil, Aysenur Ince, Ilker Ahiskalioglu, Ali Alici, Hacı Ahmet Aydin, Ali Kilinc, Osman Ozgur |
author_sort | Aksoy, Mehmet |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Our aim is to compare the hemodynamic effects of combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block (PCSNB) with continuous spinal anaesthesia (CSA) in elderly high-risk patients undergoing hip replacement surgery. METHODS: Seventy patients over the age of 60 with ASA III or IV physical status were randomly allocated to two groups: In the PCSNB group, ultrasound-guided psoas compartment block was performed with modified Winnie technique using 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200.000 epinephrine (5 μgr/mL) and iliac crest block was performed using the same local anaesthetic solution (5 mL). All patients in the PCSNB group needed continuing infusion of propofol (2 mg/kg/h) during operation. In the CSA group, CSA was performed in the L(3)-L(4) interspaced with the patient in lateral decubitus position using 2.5 mg of isobaric bupivacaine 0.5%. When sensory block was not reached to the level of T(12) within 10 minutes in the CSA group, additional 2.5 mg of isobaric bupivacaine 0.5% was administered through the catheter at 5-min intervals by limiting the total dose of 15 mg until a T(12) level of the sensory block was achieved. RESULTS: The PCSNB group had significantly higher mean arterial blood pressure values at the beginning of surgery and at 5(th), 10(th) and 20(th) minutes of surgery compared to the CSA group (P =0.038, P =0.029, P =0.012, P =0.009 respectively). There were no significant differences between groups in terms of heart rate and peripheral oxygen saturation values during surgery and the postoperative period (P >0.05). Arterial hypotension required ephedrine was observed in 13 patients in the CSA and 4 patients in the PCSNB group (P =0.012). CONCLUSIONS: CSA and PCSNB produce satisfactory quality of anaesthesia in elderly high-risk patients with fewer hemodynamic changes in PCSNB cases compared with CSA cases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12614000658617, Registered 24 June 2014. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4237736 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42377362014-11-21 Continuous spinal anaesthesia versus ultrasound-guided combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block for hip replacement surgery in elderly high-risk patients: a prospective randomised study Aksoy, Mehmet Dostbil, Aysenur Ince, Ilker Ahiskalioglu, Ali Alici, Hacı Ahmet Aydin, Ali Kilinc, Osman Ozgur BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Our aim is to compare the hemodynamic effects of combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block (PCSNB) with continuous spinal anaesthesia (CSA) in elderly high-risk patients undergoing hip replacement surgery. METHODS: Seventy patients over the age of 60 with ASA III or IV physical status were randomly allocated to two groups: In the PCSNB group, ultrasound-guided psoas compartment block was performed with modified Winnie technique using 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200.000 epinephrine (5 μgr/mL) and iliac crest block was performed using the same local anaesthetic solution (5 mL). All patients in the PCSNB group needed continuing infusion of propofol (2 mg/kg/h) during operation. In the CSA group, CSA was performed in the L(3)-L(4) interspaced with the patient in lateral decubitus position using 2.5 mg of isobaric bupivacaine 0.5%. When sensory block was not reached to the level of T(12) within 10 minutes in the CSA group, additional 2.5 mg of isobaric bupivacaine 0.5% was administered through the catheter at 5-min intervals by limiting the total dose of 15 mg until a T(12) level of the sensory block was achieved. RESULTS: The PCSNB group had significantly higher mean arterial blood pressure values at the beginning of surgery and at 5(th), 10(th) and 20(th) minutes of surgery compared to the CSA group (P =0.038, P =0.029, P =0.012, P =0.009 respectively). There were no significant differences between groups in terms of heart rate and peripheral oxygen saturation values during surgery and the postoperative period (P >0.05). Arterial hypotension required ephedrine was observed in 13 patients in the CSA and 4 patients in the PCSNB group (P =0.012). CONCLUSIONS: CSA and PCSNB produce satisfactory quality of anaesthesia in elderly high-risk patients with fewer hemodynamic changes in PCSNB cases compared with CSA cases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12614000658617, Registered 24 June 2014. BioMed Central 2014-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4237736/ /pubmed/25414593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-99 Text en © Aksoy et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Aksoy, Mehmet Dostbil, Aysenur Ince, Ilker Ahiskalioglu, Ali Alici, Hacı Ahmet Aydin, Ali Kilinc, Osman Ozgur Continuous spinal anaesthesia versus ultrasound-guided combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block for hip replacement surgery in elderly high-risk patients: a prospective randomised study |
title | Continuous spinal anaesthesia versus ultrasound-guided combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block for hip replacement surgery in elderly high-risk patients: a prospective randomised study |
title_full | Continuous spinal anaesthesia versus ultrasound-guided combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block for hip replacement surgery in elderly high-risk patients: a prospective randomised study |
title_fullStr | Continuous spinal anaesthesia versus ultrasound-guided combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block for hip replacement surgery in elderly high-risk patients: a prospective randomised study |
title_full_unstemmed | Continuous spinal anaesthesia versus ultrasound-guided combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block for hip replacement surgery in elderly high-risk patients: a prospective randomised study |
title_short | Continuous spinal anaesthesia versus ultrasound-guided combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block for hip replacement surgery in elderly high-risk patients: a prospective randomised study |
title_sort | continuous spinal anaesthesia versus ultrasound-guided combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block for hip replacement surgery in elderly high-risk patients: a prospective randomised study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4237736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25414593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-99 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aksoymehmet continuousspinalanaesthesiaversusultrasoundguidedcombinedpsoascompartmentsciaticnerveblockforhipreplacementsurgeryinelderlyhighriskpatientsaprospectiverandomisedstudy AT dostbilaysenur continuousspinalanaesthesiaversusultrasoundguidedcombinedpsoascompartmentsciaticnerveblockforhipreplacementsurgeryinelderlyhighriskpatientsaprospectiverandomisedstudy AT inceilker continuousspinalanaesthesiaversusultrasoundguidedcombinedpsoascompartmentsciaticnerveblockforhipreplacementsurgeryinelderlyhighriskpatientsaprospectiverandomisedstudy AT ahiskaliogluali continuousspinalanaesthesiaversusultrasoundguidedcombinedpsoascompartmentsciaticnerveblockforhipreplacementsurgeryinelderlyhighriskpatientsaprospectiverandomisedstudy AT alicihacıahmet continuousspinalanaesthesiaversusultrasoundguidedcombinedpsoascompartmentsciaticnerveblockforhipreplacementsurgeryinelderlyhighriskpatientsaprospectiverandomisedstudy AT aydinali continuousspinalanaesthesiaversusultrasoundguidedcombinedpsoascompartmentsciaticnerveblockforhipreplacementsurgeryinelderlyhighriskpatientsaprospectiverandomisedstudy AT kilincosmanozgur continuousspinalanaesthesiaversusultrasoundguidedcombinedpsoascompartmentsciaticnerveblockforhipreplacementsurgeryinelderlyhighriskpatientsaprospectiverandomisedstudy |