Cargando…

Suture anchor fixation strength with or without augmentation in osteopenic and severely osteoporotic bones in rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study on polyurethane foam model

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to compare the results of various types of anchor applications with or without augmentation in both osteopenic and severely osteoporotic bone models. METHODS: Two different types of suture anchors were tested in severely osteoporotic (SOP) and osteope...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Er, Mehmet Serhan, Altinel, Levent, Eroglu, Mehmet, Verim, Ozgur, Demir, Teyfik, Atmaca, Halil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4237878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25148925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-9-48
_version_ 1782345416527839232
author Er, Mehmet Serhan
Altinel, Levent
Eroglu, Mehmet
Verim, Ozgur
Demir, Teyfik
Atmaca, Halil
author_facet Er, Mehmet Serhan
Altinel, Levent
Eroglu, Mehmet
Verim, Ozgur
Demir, Teyfik
Atmaca, Halil
author_sort Er, Mehmet Serhan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to compare the results of various types of anchor applications with or without augmentation in both osteopenic and severely osteoporotic bone models. METHODS: Two different types of suture anchors were tested in severely osteoporotic (SOP) and osteopenic polyurethane (PU) foam blocks using an established protocol. An Instron machine applied static loading parallel to the axis of insertion until failure, and the mean anchor failure strengths were calculated. The mode of failure (anchor pullout, suture tear) was recorded. The anchors tested included the Corkscrew® (CS) (Arthrex Inc., Naples, FL, USA) (without augmentation, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)-augmented, and bioabsorbable tricalcium phosphate (TCP) cement-augmented) and Corkscrew® FT II (CS FT II) 5.5 mm (without augmentation as used routinely). RESULTS: The mean failure loads for both SOP and osteopenic PU foam blocks, respectively, were as follows: CS, 16.2 and 212.4 N; CS with TCP, 75.2 and 396 N; CS with PMMA, 101.2 and 528.8 N; CS FT II, 13.8 and 339.8 N. CONCLUSIONS: Augmentation of CS with TCP or PMMA would be essential to SOP bones. In the osteopenic bone model, although anchor fixation augmented with PMMA is the best fixation method, CS augmented with TCP cement or CS FT II without any need for augmentation may also be used as an alternative.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4237878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42378782014-11-21 Suture anchor fixation strength with or without augmentation in osteopenic and severely osteoporotic bones in rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study on polyurethane foam model Er, Mehmet Serhan Altinel, Levent Eroglu, Mehmet Verim, Ozgur Demir, Teyfik Atmaca, Halil J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to compare the results of various types of anchor applications with or without augmentation in both osteopenic and severely osteoporotic bone models. METHODS: Two different types of suture anchors were tested in severely osteoporotic (SOP) and osteopenic polyurethane (PU) foam blocks using an established protocol. An Instron machine applied static loading parallel to the axis of insertion until failure, and the mean anchor failure strengths were calculated. The mode of failure (anchor pullout, suture tear) was recorded. The anchors tested included the Corkscrew® (CS) (Arthrex Inc., Naples, FL, USA) (without augmentation, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)-augmented, and bioabsorbable tricalcium phosphate (TCP) cement-augmented) and Corkscrew® FT II (CS FT II) 5.5 mm (without augmentation as used routinely). RESULTS: The mean failure loads for both SOP and osteopenic PU foam blocks, respectively, were as follows: CS, 16.2 and 212.4 N; CS with TCP, 75.2 and 396 N; CS with PMMA, 101.2 and 528.8 N; CS FT II, 13.8 and 339.8 N. CONCLUSIONS: Augmentation of CS with TCP or PMMA would be essential to SOP bones. In the osteopenic bone model, although anchor fixation augmented with PMMA is the best fixation method, CS augmented with TCP cement or CS FT II without any need for augmentation may also be used as an alternative. BioMed Central 2014-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4237878/ /pubmed/25148925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-9-48 Text en Copyright © 2014 Er et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Er, Mehmet Serhan
Altinel, Levent
Eroglu, Mehmet
Verim, Ozgur
Demir, Teyfik
Atmaca, Halil
Suture anchor fixation strength with or without augmentation in osteopenic and severely osteoporotic bones in rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study on polyurethane foam model
title Suture anchor fixation strength with or without augmentation in osteopenic and severely osteoporotic bones in rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study on polyurethane foam model
title_full Suture anchor fixation strength with or without augmentation in osteopenic and severely osteoporotic bones in rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study on polyurethane foam model
title_fullStr Suture anchor fixation strength with or without augmentation in osteopenic and severely osteoporotic bones in rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study on polyurethane foam model
title_full_unstemmed Suture anchor fixation strength with or without augmentation in osteopenic and severely osteoporotic bones in rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study on polyurethane foam model
title_short Suture anchor fixation strength with or without augmentation in osteopenic and severely osteoporotic bones in rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study on polyurethane foam model
title_sort suture anchor fixation strength with or without augmentation in osteopenic and severely osteoporotic bones in rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study on polyurethane foam model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4237878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25148925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-9-48
work_keys_str_mv AT ermehmetserhan sutureanchorfixationstrengthwithorwithoutaugmentationinosteopenicandseverelyosteoporoticbonesinrotatorcuffrepairabiomechanicalstudyonpolyurethanefoammodel
AT altinellevent sutureanchorfixationstrengthwithorwithoutaugmentationinosteopenicandseverelyosteoporoticbonesinrotatorcuffrepairabiomechanicalstudyonpolyurethanefoammodel
AT eroglumehmet sutureanchorfixationstrengthwithorwithoutaugmentationinosteopenicandseverelyosteoporoticbonesinrotatorcuffrepairabiomechanicalstudyonpolyurethanefoammodel
AT verimozgur sutureanchorfixationstrengthwithorwithoutaugmentationinosteopenicandseverelyosteoporoticbonesinrotatorcuffrepairabiomechanicalstudyonpolyurethanefoammodel
AT demirteyfik sutureanchorfixationstrengthwithorwithoutaugmentationinosteopenicandseverelyosteoporoticbonesinrotatorcuffrepairabiomechanicalstudyonpolyurethanefoammodel
AT atmacahalil sutureanchorfixationstrengthwithorwithoutaugmentationinosteopenicandseverelyosteoporoticbonesinrotatorcuffrepairabiomechanicalstudyonpolyurethanefoammodel