Cargando…

Mechanical properties of cobalt-chromium wires compared to stainless steel and β-titanium wires

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported on mechanical properties of different orthodontic wires. However, there is a paucity of information that comparing the mechanical properties of Blue Elgiloy (BE) when compared to stainless steel and TMA, as finishing wires as received by different companies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alobeid, Ahmad, Hasan, Malak, Al-Suleiman, Mahmoud, El-Bialy, Tarek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4238082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25426458
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.143237
_version_ 1782345458085003264
author Alobeid, Ahmad
Hasan, Malak
Al-Suleiman, Mahmoud
El-Bialy, Tarek
author_facet Alobeid, Ahmad
Hasan, Malak
Al-Suleiman, Mahmoud
El-Bialy, Tarek
author_sort Alobeid, Ahmad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported on mechanical properties of different orthodontic wires. However, there is a paucity of information that comparing the mechanical properties of Blue Elgiloy (BE) when compared to stainless steel and TMA, as finishing wires as received by different companies. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanical properties of BE wires compared to stainless steel (SS) and titanium Molybdenum alloy (TMA) also known as β titanium as provided by two companies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six 0.016 x 0.022-14mm-samples of each wire were fixed individually to Instron machine and were tested in loading and unloading for three times. The initial load was set for 500 Kg at a speed of 1mm/min and displacement was adjusted for (0.5, 1mm in loading and 0.5 mm unloading at 25°C). STATISTICS ANALYSIS: Variables were compared between groups by ANOVA test using SPSS statistical software. RESULTS: BE shows comparable forces to SS when loaded 0.5 and showed decreased forces in 1mm loading compared to SS, and higher than TMA. BE also showed no forces at unloading and high deformation. CONCLUSION: BE from the two companies showed comparable mechanical properties while SS and TMA were different. The deformation of BE and its decreased forces in unloading may limit its clinical use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4238082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42380822014-11-25 Mechanical properties of cobalt-chromium wires compared to stainless steel and β-titanium wires Alobeid, Ahmad Hasan, Malak Al-Suleiman, Mahmoud El-Bialy, Tarek J Orthod Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported on mechanical properties of different orthodontic wires. However, there is a paucity of information that comparing the mechanical properties of Blue Elgiloy (BE) when compared to stainless steel and TMA, as finishing wires as received by different companies. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanical properties of BE wires compared to stainless steel (SS) and titanium Molybdenum alloy (TMA) also known as β titanium as provided by two companies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six 0.016 x 0.022-14mm-samples of each wire were fixed individually to Instron machine and were tested in loading and unloading for three times. The initial load was set for 500 Kg at a speed of 1mm/min and displacement was adjusted for (0.5, 1mm in loading and 0.5 mm unloading at 25°C). STATISTICS ANALYSIS: Variables were compared between groups by ANOVA test using SPSS statistical software. RESULTS: BE shows comparable forces to SS when loaded 0.5 and showed decreased forces in 1mm loading compared to SS, and higher than TMA. BE also showed no forces at unloading and high deformation. CONCLUSION: BE from the two companies showed comparable mechanical properties while SS and TMA were different. The deformation of BE and its decreased forces in unloading may limit its clinical use. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4238082/ /pubmed/25426458 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.143237 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Orthodontic Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Alobeid, Ahmad
Hasan, Malak
Al-Suleiman, Mahmoud
El-Bialy, Tarek
Mechanical properties of cobalt-chromium wires compared to stainless steel and β-titanium wires
title Mechanical properties of cobalt-chromium wires compared to stainless steel and β-titanium wires
title_full Mechanical properties of cobalt-chromium wires compared to stainless steel and β-titanium wires
title_fullStr Mechanical properties of cobalt-chromium wires compared to stainless steel and β-titanium wires
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical properties of cobalt-chromium wires compared to stainless steel and β-titanium wires
title_short Mechanical properties of cobalt-chromium wires compared to stainless steel and β-titanium wires
title_sort mechanical properties of cobalt-chromium wires compared to stainless steel and β-titanium wires
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4238082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25426458
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.143237
work_keys_str_mv AT alobeidahmad mechanicalpropertiesofcobaltchromiumwirescomparedtostainlesssteelandbtitaniumwires
AT hasanmalak mechanicalpropertiesofcobaltchromiumwirescomparedtostainlesssteelandbtitaniumwires
AT alsuleimanmahmoud mechanicalpropertiesofcobaltchromiumwirescomparedtostainlesssteelandbtitaniumwires
AT elbialytarek mechanicalpropertiesofcobaltchromiumwirescomparedtostainlesssteelandbtitaniumwires