Cargando…

Periareolar Extra-Glandular Breast Augmentation

BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation is the most frequent procedure performed according to the 2009 Quick Facts report of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This study presents the periareolar extra-glandular breast augmentation. METHODS: From 2004 to 2010 among 32 female patients, peri-areolar in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohmand, Muhammad Humayun, Ahmad, Muhammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4238338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25489511
_version_ 1782345485156089856
author Mohmand, Muhammad Humayun
Ahmad, Muhammad
author_facet Mohmand, Muhammad Humayun
Ahmad, Muhammad
author_sort Mohmand, Muhammad Humayun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation is the most frequent procedure performed according to the 2009 Quick Facts report of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This study presents the periareolar extra-glandular breast augmentation. METHODS: From 2004 to 2010 among 32 female patients, peri-areolar incision was performed for breast augmentation. Dissection was performed in subcutaneous plane towards the inferior pole to reach the inframammary fold and was continued in the upwards direction in the subglandular plane to create a pocket. Once the implant of desired size was in place, three sutures fixed the inframammary fold. The skin incision was closed using 4-0 non-absorbable suture. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 30.7 years and the average incision length was 5.8 cm. 59.4% of patients had an implant size of more than 305 ml and less than 10% of patients had drains which were removed the next morning. All patients were followed regularly and no case of implant infection or removal was seen and only 2 patients had slight stretched scars. In one patient, the implant was high riding and no case of the capsular contracture was noticed. Changes in sensation were noted in 21.9% patients at 3 month interval which was reduced to 6.3% at 6 months interval. Similarly no case of rippling or other visible deformity was noted. CONCLUSION: The extra-glandular periareolar approach for the breast augmentation can be a good option with few side-effects even it is associated with a higher level of surgical expertise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4238338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42383382014-12-08 Periareolar Extra-Glandular Breast Augmentation Mohmand, Muhammad Humayun Ahmad, Muhammad World J Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation is the most frequent procedure performed according to the 2009 Quick Facts report of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This study presents the periareolar extra-glandular breast augmentation. METHODS: From 2004 to 2010 among 32 female patients, peri-areolar incision was performed for breast augmentation. Dissection was performed in subcutaneous plane towards the inferior pole to reach the inframammary fold and was continued in the upwards direction in the subglandular plane to create a pocket. Once the implant of desired size was in place, three sutures fixed the inframammary fold. The skin incision was closed using 4-0 non-absorbable suture. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 30.7 years and the average incision length was 5.8 cm. 59.4% of patients had an implant size of more than 305 ml and less than 10% of patients had drains which were removed the next morning. All patients were followed regularly and no case of implant infection or removal was seen and only 2 patients had slight stretched scars. In one patient, the implant was high riding and no case of the capsular contracture was noticed. Changes in sensation were noted in 21.9% patients at 3 month interval which was reduced to 6.3% at 6 months interval. Similarly no case of rippling or other visible deformity was noted. CONCLUSION: The extra-glandular periareolar approach for the breast augmentation can be a good option with few side-effects even it is associated with a higher level of surgical expertise. Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons 2013-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4238338/ /pubmed/25489511 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mohmand, Muhammad Humayun
Ahmad, Muhammad
Periareolar Extra-Glandular Breast Augmentation
title Periareolar Extra-Glandular Breast Augmentation
title_full Periareolar Extra-Glandular Breast Augmentation
title_fullStr Periareolar Extra-Glandular Breast Augmentation
title_full_unstemmed Periareolar Extra-Glandular Breast Augmentation
title_short Periareolar Extra-Glandular Breast Augmentation
title_sort periareolar extra-glandular breast augmentation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4238338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25489511
work_keys_str_mv AT mohmandmuhammadhumayun periareolarextraglandularbreastaugmentation
AT ahmadmuhammad periareolarextraglandularbreastaugmentation