Cargando…

Passive sampling methods for contaminated sediments: State of the science for metals

“Dissolved” concentrations of contaminants in sediment porewater (C(free)) provide a more relevant exposure metric for risk assessment than do total concentrations. Passive sampling methods (PSMs) for estimating C(free) offer the potential for cost-efficient and accurate in situ characterization of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peijnenburg, Willie JGM, Teasdale, Peter R, Reible, Danny, Mondon, Julie, Bennett, William W, Campbell, Peter GC
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4238822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24470168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1502
_version_ 1782345521358176256
author Peijnenburg, Willie JGM
Teasdale, Peter R
Reible, Danny
Mondon, Julie
Bennett, William W
Campbell, Peter GC
author_facet Peijnenburg, Willie JGM
Teasdale, Peter R
Reible, Danny
Mondon, Julie
Bennett, William W
Campbell, Peter GC
author_sort Peijnenburg, Willie JGM
collection PubMed
description “Dissolved” concentrations of contaminants in sediment porewater (C(free)) provide a more relevant exposure metric for risk assessment than do total concentrations. Passive sampling methods (PSMs) for estimating C(free) offer the potential for cost-efficient and accurate in situ characterization of C(free) for inorganic sediment contaminants. In contrast to the PSMs validated and applied for organic contaminants, the various passive sampling devices developed for metals, metalloids, and some nonmetals (collectively termed “metals”) have been exploited to a limited extent, despite recognized advantages that include low detection limits, detection of time-averaged trends, high spatial resolution, information about dissolved metal speciation, and the ability to capture episodic events and cyclic changes that may be missed by occasional grab sampling. We summarize the PSM approaches for assessing metal toxicity to, and bioaccumulation by, sediment-dwelling biota, including the recognized advantages and limitations of each approach, the need for standardization, and further work needed to facilitate broader acceptance and application of PSM-derived information by decision makers. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2014;10:179–196. © 2014 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC. KEY POINTS: 1. Passive sampling methods (PSMs) offer the potential for cost-efficient and accurate in situ characterization of the dissolved concentrations for inorganic sediment contaminants. 2. PSMs are useful for evaluating the geochemical behavior of metals in surficial sediments, including determination of fluxes across the sediment-water interface, and post-depositional changes in metal speciation. 3. Few studies have tried to link PSM responses in sediments to metal uptake and toxicity responses in benthic organisms. There is a clear need for further studies. 4. Future PSMs could be designed to mimic saturable kinetics, which would fill the gap between the kinetic and the equilibrium regime samplers currently used, and may improve prediction of metals accumulation by benthic organisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4238822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42388222014-11-28 Passive sampling methods for contaminated sediments: State of the science for metals Peijnenburg, Willie JGM Teasdale, Peter R Reible, Danny Mondon, Julie Bennett, William W Campbell, Peter GC Integr Environ Assess Manag Special Series: Passive Sampling Methods for Contaminated Sediments “Dissolved” concentrations of contaminants in sediment porewater (C(free)) provide a more relevant exposure metric for risk assessment than do total concentrations. Passive sampling methods (PSMs) for estimating C(free) offer the potential for cost-efficient and accurate in situ characterization of C(free) for inorganic sediment contaminants. In contrast to the PSMs validated and applied for organic contaminants, the various passive sampling devices developed for metals, metalloids, and some nonmetals (collectively termed “metals”) have been exploited to a limited extent, despite recognized advantages that include low detection limits, detection of time-averaged trends, high spatial resolution, information about dissolved metal speciation, and the ability to capture episodic events and cyclic changes that may be missed by occasional grab sampling. We summarize the PSM approaches for assessing metal toxicity to, and bioaccumulation by, sediment-dwelling biota, including the recognized advantages and limitations of each approach, the need for standardization, and further work needed to facilitate broader acceptance and application of PSM-derived information by decision makers. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2014;10:179–196. © 2014 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC. KEY POINTS: 1. Passive sampling methods (PSMs) offer the potential for cost-efficient and accurate in situ characterization of the dissolved concentrations for inorganic sediment contaminants. 2. PSMs are useful for evaluating the geochemical behavior of metals in surficial sediments, including determination of fluxes across the sediment-water interface, and post-depositional changes in metal speciation. 3. Few studies have tried to link PSM responses in sediments to metal uptake and toxicity responses in benthic organisms. There is a clear need for further studies. 4. Future PSMs could be designed to mimic saturable kinetics, which would fill the gap between the kinetic and the equilibrium regime samplers currently used, and may improve prediction of metals accumulation by benthic organisms. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-04 2014-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4238822/ /pubmed/24470168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1502 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Series: Passive Sampling Methods for Contaminated Sediments
Peijnenburg, Willie JGM
Teasdale, Peter R
Reible, Danny
Mondon, Julie
Bennett, William W
Campbell, Peter GC
Passive sampling methods for contaminated sediments: State of the science for metals
title Passive sampling methods for contaminated sediments: State of the science for metals
title_full Passive sampling methods for contaminated sediments: State of the science for metals
title_fullStr Passive sampling methods for contaminated sediments: State of the science for metals
title_full_unstemmed Passive sampling methods for contaminated sediments: State of the science for metals
title_short Passive sampling methods for contaminated sediments: State of the science for metals
title_sort passive sampling methods for contaminated sediments: state of the science for metals
topic Special Series: Passive Sampling Methods for Contaminated Sediments
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4238822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24470168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1502
work_keys_str_mv AT peijnenburgwilliejgm passivesamplingmethodsforcontaminatedsedimentsstateofthescienceformetals
AT teasdalepeterr passivesamplingmethodsforcontaminatedsedimentsstateofthescienceformetals
AT reibledanny passivesamplingmethodsforcontaminatedsedimentsstateofthescienceformetals
AT mondonjulie passivesamplingmethodsforcontaminatedsedimentsstateofthescienceformetals
AT bennettwilliamw passivesamplingmethodsforcontaminatedsedimentsstateofthescienceformetals
AT campbellpetergc passivesamplingmethodsforcontaminatedsedimentsstateofthescienceformetals