Cargando…
Ultrasonographic reference values for assessing normal radial nerve ultrasonography in the normal population
High-resolution ultrasound has been used recently to characterize median and ulnar nerves, but is seldom used to characterize radial nerves. The radial nerve is more frequently involved in entrapment syndromes than the ulnar and median nerves. However, the reference standard for normal radial nerves...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4239776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25422648 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.143433 |
_version_ | 1782345638780862464 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Jun Wu, Shan Ren, Jun |
author_facet | Chen, Jun Wu, Shan Ren, Jun |
author_sort | Chen, Jun |
collection | PubMed |
description | High-resolution ultrasound has been used recently to characterize median and ulnar nerves, but is seldom used to characterize radial nerves. The radial nerve is more frequently involved in entrapment syndromes than the ulnar and median nerves. However, the reference standard for normal radial nerves has not been established. Thus, this study measured the cross-sectional areas of radial nerves of 200 healthy male or female volunteers, aged 18 to 75, using high-resolution ultrasound. The results showed that mean cross-sectional areas of radial nerves at 4 cm upon the lateral epicondyle of the humerus and mid-humerus (midpoint between the elbow crease and axilla) were 5.14 ± 1.24 and 5.08 ± 1.23 mm(2), respectively. The age and the dominant side did not affect the results, but the above-mentioned cross-sectional areas were larger in males (5.31 ± 1.25 and 5.19 ± 1.23 mm(2)) than in females (4.93 ± 1.21 and 4.93 ± 1.23 mm(2), respectively). In addition, the cross-sectional areas of radial nerves were positively correlated with height and weight (r = 0.38, 0.36, respectively, both P < 0.05). These data provide basic clinical data for the use of high-resolution ultrasound for the future diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic evaluation of peripheral neuropathies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4239776 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42397762014-11-24 Ultrasonographic reference values for assessing normal radial nerve ultrasonography in the normal population Chen, Jun Wu, Shan Ren, Jun Neural Regen Res Technical Update High-resolution ultrasound has been used recently to characterize median and ulnar nerves, but is seldom used to characterize radial nerves. The radial nerve is more frequently involved in entrapment syndromes than the ulnar and median nerves. However, the reference standard for normal radial nerves has not been established. Thus, this study measured the cross-sectional areas of radial nerves of 200 healthy male or female volunteers, aged 18 to 75, using high-resolution ultrasound. The results showed that mean cross-sectional areas of radial nerves at 4 cm upon the lateral epicondyle of the humerus and mid-humerus (midpoint between the elbow crease and axilla) were 5.14 ± 1.24 and 5.08 ± 1.23 mm(2), respectively. The age and the dominant side did not affect the results, but the above-mentioned cross-sectional areas were larger in males (5.31 ± 1.25 and 5.19 ± 1.23 mm(2)) than in females (4.93 ± 1.21 and 4.93 ± 1.23 mm(2), respectively). In addition, the cross-sectional areas of radial nerves were positively correlated with height and weight (r = 0.38, 0.36, respectively, both P < 0.05). These data provide basic clinical data for the use of high-resolution ultrasound for the future diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic evaluation of peripheral neuropathies. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4239776/ /pubmed/25422648 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.143433 Text en Copyright: © Neural Regeneration Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technical Update Chen, Jun Wu, Shan Ren, Jun Ultrasonographic reference values for assessing normal radial nerve ultrasonography in the normal population |
title | Ultrasonographic reference values for assessing normal radial nerve ultrasonography in the normal population |
title_full | Ultrasonographic reference values for assessing normal radial nerve ultrasonography in the normal population |
title_fullStr | Ultrasonographic reference values for assessing normal radial nerve ultrasonography in the normal population |
title_full_unstemmed | Ultrasonographic reference values for assessing normal radial nerve ultrasonography in the normal population |
title_short | Ultrasonographic reference values for assessing normal radial nerve ultrasonography in the normal population |
title_sort | ultrasonographic reference values for assessing normal radial nerve ultrasonography in the normal population |
topic | Technical Update |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4239776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25422648 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.143433 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenjun ultrasonographicreferencevaluesforassessingnormalradialnerveultrasonographyinthenormalpopulation AT wushan ultrasonographicreferencevaluesforassessingnormalradialnerveultrasonographyinthenormalpopulation AT renjun ultrasonographicreferencevaluesforassessingnormalradialnerveultrasonographyinthenormalpopulation |