Cargando…
Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine
OBJECTIVE: Circulatory shock is a life-threatening syndrome resulting in multiorgan failure and a high mortality rate. The aim of this consensus is to provide support to the bedside clinician regarding the diagnosis, management and monitoring of shock. METHODS: The European Society of Intensive Care...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4239778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25392034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z |
_version_ | 1782345639245381632 |
---|---|
author | Cecconi, Maurizio De Backer, Daniel Antonelli, Massimo Beale, Richard Bakker, Jan Hofer, Christoph Jaeschke, Roman Mebazaa, Alexandre Pinsky, Michael R. Teboul, Jean Louis Vincent, Jean Louis Rhodes, Andrew |
author_facet | Cecconi, Maurizio De Backer, Daniel Antonelli, Massimo Beale, Richard Bakker, Jan Hofer, Christoph Jaeschke, Roman Mebazaa, Alexandre Pinsky, Michael R. Teboul, Jean Louis Vincent, Jean Louis Rhodes, Andrew |
author_sort | Cecconi, Maurizio |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Circulatory shock is a life-threatening syndrome resulting in multiorgan failure and a high mortality rate. The aim of this consensus is to provide support to the bedside clinician regarding the diagnosis, management and monitoring of shock. METHODS: The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine invited 12 experts to form a Task Force to update a previous consensus (Antonelli et al.: Intensive Care Med 33:575–590, 2007). The same five questions addressed in the earlier consensus were used as the outline for the literature search and review, with the aim of the Task Force to produce statements based on the available literature and evidence. These questions were: (1) What are the epidemiologic and pathophysiologic features of shock in the intensive care unit? (2) Should we monitor preload and fluid responsiveness in shock? (3) How and when should we monitor stroke volume or cardiac output in shock? (4) What markers of the regional and microcirculation can be monitored, and how can cellular function be assessed in shock? (5) What is the evidence for using hemodynamic monitoring to direct therapy in shock? Four types of statements were used: definition, recommendation, best practice and statement of fact. RESULTS: Forty-four statements were made. The main new statements include: (1) statements on individualizing blood pressure targets; (2) statements on the assessment and prediction of fluid responsiveness; (3) statements on the use of echocardiography and hemodynamic monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus provides 44 statements that can be used at the bedside to diagnose, treat and monitor patients with shock. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4239778 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42397782014-11-25 Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Cecconi, Maurizio De Backer, Daniel Antonelli, Massimo Beale, Richard Bakker, Jan Hofer, Christoph Jaeschke, Roman Mebazaa, Alexandre Pinsky, Michael R. Teboul, Jean Louis Vincent, Jean Louis Rhodes, Andrew Intensive Care Med Conference Reports and Expert Panel OBJECTIVE: Circulatory shock is a life-threatening syndrome resulting in multiorgan failure and a high mortality rate. The aim of this consensus is to provide support to the bedside clinician regarding the diagnosis, management and monitoring of shock. METHODS: The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine invited 12 experts to form a Task Force to update a previous consensus (Antonelli et al.: Intensive Care Med 33:575–590, 2007). The same five questions addressed in the earlier consensus were used as the outline for the literature search and review, with the aim of the Task Force to produce statements based on the available literature and evidence. These questions were: (1) What are the epidemiologic and pathophysiologic features of shock in the intensive care unit? (2) Should we monitor preload and fluid responsiveness in shock? (3) How and when should we monitor stroke volume or cardiac output in shock? (4) What markers of the regional and microcirculation can be monitored, and how can cellular function be assessed in shock? (5) What is the evidence for using hemodynamic monitoring to direct therapy in shock? Four types of statements were used: definition, recommendation, best practice and statement of fact. RESULTS: Forty-four statements were made. The main new statements include: (1) statements on individualizing blood pressure targets; (2) statements on the assessment and prediction of fluid responsiveness; (3) statements on the use of echocardiography and hemodynamic monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus provides 44 statements that can be used at the bedside to diagnose, treat and monitor patients with shock. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-11-13 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4239778/ /pubmed/25392034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Conference Reports and Expert Panel Cecconi, Maurizio De Backer, Daniel Antonelli, Massimo Beale, Richard Bakker, Jan Hofer, Christoph Jaeschke, Roman Mebazaa, Alexandre Pinsky, Michael R. Teboul, Jean Louis Vincent, Jean Louis Rhodes, Andrew Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine |
title | Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine |
title_full | Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine |
title_fullStr | Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine |
title_full_unstemmed | Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine |
title_short | Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine |
title_sort | consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. task force of the european society of intensive care medicine |
topic | Conference Reports and Expert Panel |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4239778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25392034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cecconimaurizio consensusoncirculatoryshockandhemodynamicmonitoringtaskforceoftheeuropeansocietyofintensivecaremedicine AT debackerdaniel consensusoncirculatoryshockandhemodynamicmonitoringtaskforceoftheeuropeansocietyofintensivecaremedicine AT antonellimassimo consensusoncirculatoryshockandhemodynamicmonitoringtaskforceoftheeuropeansocietyofintensivecaremedicine AT bealerichard consensusoncirculatoryshockandhemodynamicmonitoringtaskforceoftheeuropeansocietyofintensivecaremedicine AT bakkerjan consensusoncirculatoryshockandhemodynamicmonitoringtaskforceoftheeuropeansocietyofintensivecaremedicine AT hoferchristoph consensusoncirculatoryshockandhemodynamicmonitoringtaskforceoftheeuropeansocietyofintensivecaremedicine AT jaeschkeroman consensusoncirculatoryshockandhemodynamicmonitoringtaskforceoftheeuropeansocietyofintensivecaremedicine AT mebazaaalexandre consensusoncirculatoryshockandhemodynamicmonitoringtaskforceoftheeuropeansocietyofintensivecaremedicine AT pinskymichaelr consensusoncirculatoryshockandhemodynamicmonitoringtaskforceoftheeuropeansocietyofintensivecaremedicine AT tebouljeanlouis consensusoncirculatoryshockandhemodynamicmonitoringtaskforceoftheeuropeansocietyofintensivecaremedicine AT vincentjeanlouis consensusoncirculatoryshockandhemodynamicmonitoringtaskforceoftheeuropeansocietyofintensivecaremedicine AT rhodesandrew consensusoncirculatoryshockandhemodynamicmonitoringtaskforceoftheeuropeansocietyofintensivecaremedicine |