Cargando…

Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

OBJECTIVE: Circulatory shock is a life-threatening syndrome resulting in multiorgan failure and a high mortality rate. The aim of this consensus is to provide support to the bedside clinician regarding the diagnosis, management and monitoring of shock. METHODS: The European Society of Intensive Care...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cecconi, Maurizio, De Backer, Daniel, Antonelli, Massimo, Beale, Richard, Bakker, Jan, Hofer, Christoph, Jaeschke, Roman, Mebazaa, Alexandre, Pinsky, Michael R., Teboul, Jean Louis, Vincent, Jean Louis, Rhodes, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4239778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25392034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z
_version_ 1782345639245381632
author Cecconi, Maurizio
De Backer, Daniel
Antonelli, Massimo
Beale, Richard
Bakker, Jan
Hofer, Christoph
Jaeschke, Roman
Mebazaa, Alexandre
Pinsky, Michael R.
Teboul, Jean Louis
Vincent, Jean Louis
Rhodes, Andrew
author_facet Cecconi, Maurizio
De Backer, Daniel
Antonelli, Massimo
Beale, Richard
Bakker, Jan
Hofer, Christoph
Jaeschke, Roman
Mebazaa, Alexandre
Pinsky, Michael R.
Teboul, Jean Louis
Vincent, Jean Louis
Rhodes, Andrew
author_sort Cecconi, Maurizio
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Circulatory shock is a life-threatening syndrome resulting in multiorgan failure and a high mortality rate. The aim of this consensus is to provide support to the bedside clinician regarding the diagnosis, management and monitoring of shock. METHODS: The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine invited 12 experts to form a Task Force to update a previous consensus (Antonelli et al.: Intensive Care Med 33:575–590, 2007). The same five questions addressed in the earlier consensus were used as the outline for the literature search and review, with the aim of the Task Force to produce statements based on the available literature and evidence. These questions were: (1) What are the epidemiologic and pathophysiologic features of shock in the intensive care unit? (2) Should we monitor preload and fluid responsiveness in shock? (3) How and when should we monitor stroke volume or cardiac output in shock? (4) What markers of the regional and microcirculation can be monitored, and how can cellular function be assessed in shock? (5) What is the evidence for using hemodynamic monitoring to direct therapy in shock? Four types of statements were used: definition, recommendation, best practice and statement of fact. RESULTS: Forty-four statements were made. The main new statements include: (1) statements on individualizing blood pressure targets; (2) statements on the assessment and prediction of fluid responsiveness; (3) statements on the use of echocardiography and hemodynamic monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus provides 44 statements that can be used at the bedside to diagnose, treat and monitor patients with shock.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4239778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42397782014-11-25 Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Cecconi, Maurizio De Backer, Daniel Antonelli, Massimo Beale, Richard Bakker, Jan Hofer, Christoph Jaeschke, Roman Mebazaa, Alexandre Pinsky, Michael R. Teboul, Jean Louis Vincent, Jean Louis Rhodes, Andrew Intensive Care Med Conference Reports and Expert Panel OBJECTIVE: Circulatory shock is a life-threatening syndrome resulting in multiorgan failure and a high mortality rate. The aim of this consensus is to provide support to the bedside clinician regarding the diagnosis, management and monitoring of shock. METHODS: The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine invited 12 experts to form a Task Force to update a previous consensus (Antonelli et al.: Intensive Care Med 33:575–590, 2007). The same five questions addressed in the earlier consensus were used as the outline for the literature search and review, with the aim of the Task Force to produce statements based on the available literature and evidence. These questions were: (1) What are the epidemiologic and pathophysiologic features of shock in the intensive care unit? (2) Should we monitor preload and fluid responsiveness in shock? (3) How and when should we monitor stroke volume or cardiac output in shock? (4) What markers of the regional and microcirculation can be monitored, and how can cellular function be assessed in shock? (5) What is the evidence for using hemodynamic monitoring to direct therapy in shock? Four types of statements were used: definition, recommendation, best practice and statement of fact. RESULTS: Forty-four statements were made. The main new statements include: (1) statements on individualizing blood pressure targets; (2) statements on the assessment and prediction of fluid responsiveness; (3) statements on the use of echocardiography and hemodynamic monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus provides 44 statements that can be used at the bedside to diagnose, treat and monitor patients with shock. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-11-13 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4239778/ /pubmed/25392034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Conference Reports and Expert Panel
Cecconi, Maurizio
De Backer, Daniel
Antonelli, Massimo
Beale, Richard
Bakker, Jan
Hofer, Christoph
Jaeschke, Roman
Mebazaa, Alexandre
Pinsky, Michael R.
Teboul, Jean Louis
Vincent, Jean Louis
Rhodes, Andrew
Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine
title Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine
title_full Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine
title_fullStr Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine
title_full_unstemmed Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine
title_short Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine
title_sort consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. task force of the european society of intensive care medicine
topic Conference Reports and Expert Panel
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4239778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25392034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z
work_keys_str_mv AT cecconimaurizio consensusoncirculatoryshockandhemodynamicmonitoringtaskforceoftheeuropeansocietyofintensivecaremedicine
AT debackerdaniel consensusoncirculatoryshockandhemodynamicmonitoringtaskforceoftheeuropeansocietyofintensivecaremedicine
AT antonellimassimo consensusoncirculatoryshockandhemodynamicmonitoringtaskforceoftheeuropeansocietyofintensivecaremedicine
AT bealerichard consensusoncirculatoryshockandhemodynamicmonitoringtaskforceoftheeuropeansocietyofintensivecaremedicine
AT bakkerjan consensusoncirculatoryshockandhemodynamicmonitoringtaskforceoftheeuropeansocietyofintensivecaremedicine
AT hoferchristoph consensusoncirculatoryshockandhemodynamicmonitoringtaskforceoftheeuropeansocietyofintensivecaremedicine
AT jaeschkeroman consensusoncirculatoryshockandhemodynamicmonitoringtaskforceoftheeuropeansocietyofintensivecaremedicine
AT mebazaaalexandre consensusoncirculatoryshockandhemodynamicmonitoringtaskforceoftheeuropeansocietyofintensivecaremedicine
AT pinskymichaelr consensusoncirculatoryshockandhemodynamicmonitoringtaskforceoftheeuropeansocietyofintensivecaremedicine
AT tebouljeanlouis consensusoncirculatoryshockandhemodynamicmonitoringtaskforceoftheeuropeansocietyofintensivecaremedicine
AT vincentjeanlouis consensusoncirculatoryshockandhemodynamicmonitoringtaskforceoftheeuropeansocietyofintensivecaremedicine
AT rhodesandrew consensusoncirculatoryshockandhemodynamicmonitoringtaskforceoftheeuropeansocietyofintensivecaremedicine