Cargando…
Comparison of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus by oral glucose tolerance tests done in the non-fasting (random) and fasting states
AIM: The Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of India (DIPSI) guidelines recommend the non-fasting 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) as a single-step screening and diagnostic test for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The aim of this study was to compare the DIPSI criteria with the World Heal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Milan
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4239809/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25315629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00592-014-0660-5 |
_version_ | 1782345645044006912 |
---|---|
author | Mohan, Viswanathan Mahalakshmi, Manni Mohanraj Bhavadharini, Balaji Maheswari, Kumar Kalaiyarasi, Gunasekaran Anjana, Ranjit Mohan Uma, Ram Usha, Sriram Deepa, Mohan Unnikrishnan, Ranjit Pastakia, Sonak D. Malanda, Belma Belton, Anne Kayal, Arivudainambi |
author_facet | Mohan, Viswanathan Mahalakshmi, Manni Mohanraj Bhavadharini, Balaji Maheswari, Kumar Kalaiyarasi, Gunasekaran Anjana, Ranjit Mohan Uma, Ram Usha, Sriram Deepa, Mohan Unnikrishnan, Ranjit Pastakia, Sonak D. Malanda, Belma Belton, Anne Kayal, Arivudainambi |
author_sort | Mohan, Viswanathan |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of India (DIPSI) guidelines recommend the non-fasting 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) as a single-step screening and diagnostic test for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The aim of this study was to compare the DIPSI criteria with the World Health Organization (WHO) 1999 and the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria for GDM. METHODS: A total of 1,031 pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in urban and rural Tamil Nadu, India, underwent a 75-g OGTT in both non-fasting and fasting states, 2–3 days apart. Venous plasma glucose was measured using an autoanalyser, and GDM was diagnosed by DIPSI, WHO 1999 and IADPSG criteria. RESULTS: Of the 83 women identified to have GDM by WHO 1999 criteria, only 23 were diagnosed by DIPSI criteria. Of the 106 women diagnosed to have GDM by the IADPSG criteria, only 24 were diagnosed by DIPSI. The DIPSI non-fasting OGTT 2-h VPG cut point of 140 mg/dl (7.8 mmol/l) had a very low sensitivity when compared to the WHO 1999 criteria (sensitivity 27.7 %, specificity 97.7 %) and IADPSG criteria (sensitivity 22.6 %, specificity 97.8 %). CONCLUSIONS: The DIPSI non-fasting OGTT criteria cannot be recommended for diagnosis of GDM due to its low sensitivity. Thus, as a single-step diagnostic test for GDM, the fasting OGTT needs to be done. When this is not possible, the well-established two-step procedure using the 50-g glucose challenge test as an initial screening test, followed by the diagnostic fasting OGTT, can be continued. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4239809 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer Milan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42398092014-11-25 Comparison of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus by oral glucose tolerance tests done in the non-fasting (random) and fasting states Mohan, Viswanathan Mahalakshmi, Manni Mohanraj Bhavadharini, Balaji Maheswari, Kumar Kalaiyarasi, Gunasekaran Anjana, Ranjit Mohan Uma, Ram Usha, Sriram Deepa, Mohan Unnikrishnan, Ranjit Pastakia, Sonak D. Malanda, Belma Belton, Anne Kayal, Arivudainambi Acta Diabetol Original Article AIM: The Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of India (DIPSI) guidelines recommend the non-fasting 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) as a single-step screening and diagnostic test for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The aim of this study was to compare the DIPSI criteria with the World Health Organization (WHO) 1999 and the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria for GDM. METHODS: A total of 1,031 pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in urban and rural Tamil Nadu, India, underwent a 75-g OGTT in both non-fasting and fasting states, 2–3 days apart. Venous plasma glucose was measured using an autoanalyser, and GDM was diagnosed by DIPSI, WHO 1999 and IADPSG criteria. RESULTS: Of the 83 women identified to have GDM by WHO 1999 criteria, only 23 were diagnosed by DIPSI criteria. Of the 106 women diagnosed to have GDM by the IADPSG criteria, only 24 were diagnosed by DIPSI. The DIPSI non-fasting OGTT 2-h VPG cut point of 140 mg/dl (7.8 mmol/l) had a very low sensitivity when compared to the WHO 1999 criteria (sensitivity 27.7 %, specificity 97.7 %) and IADPSG criteria (sensitivity 22.6 %, specificity 97.8 %). CONCLUSIONS: The DIPSI non-fasting OGTT criteria cannot be recommended for diagnosis of GDM due to its low sensitivity. Thus, as a single-step diagnostic test for GDM, the fasting OGTT needs to be done. When this is not possible, the well-established two-step procedure using the 50-g glucose challenge test as an initial screening test, followed by the diagnostic fasting OGTT, can be continued. Springer Milan 2014-10-15 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4239809/ /pubmed/25315629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00592-014-0660-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mohan, Viswanathan Mahalakshmi, Manni Mohanraj Bhavadharini, Balaji Maheswari, Kumar Kalaiyarasi, Gunasekaran Anjana, Ranjit Mohan Uma, Ram Usha, Sriram Deepa, Mohan Unnikrishnan, Ranjit Pastakia, Sonak D. Malanda, Belma Belton, Anne Kayal, Arivudainambi Comparison of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus by oral glucose tolerance tests done in the non-fasting (random) and fasting states |
title | Comparison of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus by oral glucose tolerance tests done in the non-fasting (random) and fasting states |
title_full | Comparison of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus by oral glucose tolerance tests done in the non-fasting (random) and fasting states |
title_fullStr | Comparison of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus by oral glucose tolerance tests done in the non-fasting (random) and fasting states |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus by oral glucose tolerance tests done in the non-fasting (random) and fasting states |
title_short | Comparison of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus by oral glucose tolerance tests done in the non-fasting (random) and fasting states |
title_sort | comparison of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus by oral glucose tolerance tests done in the non-fasting (random) and fasting states |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4239809/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25315629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00592-014-0660-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohanviswanathan comparisonofscreeningforgestationaldiabetesmellitusbyoralglucosetolerancetestsdoneinthenonfastingrandomandfastingstates AT mahalakshmimannimohanraj comparisonofscreeningforgestationaldiabetesmellitusbyoralglucosetolerancetestsdoneinthenonfastingrandomandfastingstates AT bhavadharinibalaji comparisonofscreeningforgestationaldiabetesmellitusbyoralglucosetolerancetestsdoneinthenonfastingrandomandfastingstates AT maheswarikumar comparisonofscreeningforgestationaldiabetesmellitusbyoralglucosetolerancetestsdoneinthenonfastingrandomandfastingstates AT kalaiyarasigunasekaran comparisonofscreeningforgestationaldiabetesmellitusbyoralglucosetolerancetestsdoneinthenonfastingrandomandfastingstates AT anjanaranjitmohan comparisonofscreeningforgestationaldiabetesmellitusbyoralglucosetolerancetestsdoneinthenonfastingrandomandfastingstates AT umaram comparisonofscreeningforgestationaldiabetesmellitusbyoralglucosetolerancetestsdoneinthenonfastingrandomandfastingstates AT ushasriram comparisonofscreeningforgestationaldiabetesmellitusbyoralglucosetolerancetestsdoneinthenonfastingrandomandfastingstates AT deepamohan comparisonofscreeningforgestationaldiabetesmellitusbyoralglucosetolerancetestsdoneinthenonfastingrandomandfastingstates AT unnikrishnanranjit comparisonofscreeningforgestationaldiabetesmellitusbyoralglucosetolerancetestsdoneinthenonfastingrandomandfastingstates AT pastakiasonakd comparisonofscreeningforgestationaldiabetesmellitusbyoralglucosetolerancetestsdoneinthenonfastingrandomandfastingstates AT malandabelma comparisonofscreeningforgestationaldiabetesmellitusbyoralglucosetolerancetestsdoneinthenonfastingrandomandfastingstates AT beltonanne comparisonofscreeningforgestationaldiabetesmellitusbyoralglucosetolerancetestsdoneinthenonfastingrandomandfastingstates AT kayalarivudainambi comparisonofscreeningforgestationaldiabetesmellitusbyoralglucosetolerancetestsdoneinthenonfastingrandomandfastingstates |