Cargando…

Comparison of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus by oral glucose tolerance tests done in the non-fasting (random) and fasting states

AIM: The Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of India (DIPSI) guidelines recommend the non-fasting 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) as a single-step screening and diagnostic test for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The aim of this study was to compare the DIPSI criteria with the World Heal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohan, Viswanathan, Mahalakshmi, Manni Mohanraj, Bhavadharini, Balaji, Maheswari, Kumar, Kalaiyarasi, Gunasekaran, Anjana, Ranjit Mohan, Uma, Ram, Usha, Sriram, Deepa, Mohan, Unnikrishnan, Ranjit, Pastakia, Sonak D., Malanda, Belma, Belton, Anne, Kayal, Arivudainambi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4239809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25315629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00592-014-0660-5
_version_ 1782345645044006912
author Mohan, Viswanathan
Mahalakshmi, Manni Mohanraj
Bhavadharini, Balaji
Maheswari, Kumar
Kalaiyarasi, Gunasekaran
Anjana, Ranjit Mohan
Uma, Ram
Usha, Sriram
Deepa, Mohan
Unnikrishnan, Ranjit
Pastakia, Sonak D.
Malanda, Belma
Belton, Anne
Kayal, Arivudainambi
author_facet Mohan, Viswanathan
Mahalakshmi, Manni Mohanraj
Bhavadharini, Balaji
Maheswari, Kumar
Kalaiyarasi, Gunasekaran
Anjana, Ranjit Mohan
Uma, Ram
Usha, Sriram
Deepa, Mohan
Unnikrishnan, Ranjit
Pastakia, Sonak D.
Malanda, Belma
Belton, Anne
Kayal, Arivudainambi
author_sort Mohan, Viswanathan
collection PubMed
description AIM: The Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of India (DIPSI) guidelines recommend the non-fasting 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) as a single-step screening and diagnostic test for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The aim of this study was to compare the DIPSI criteria with the World Health Organization (WHO) 1999 and the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria for GDM. METHODS: A total of 1,031 pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in urban and rural Tamil Nadu, India, underwent a 75-g OGTT in both non-fasting and fasting states, 2–3 days apart. Venous plasma glucose was measured using an autoanalyser, and GDM was diagnosed by DIPSI, WHO 1999 and IADPSG criteria. RESULTS: Of the 83 women identified to have GDM by WHO 1999 criteria, only 23 were diagnosed by DIPSI criteria. Of the 106 women diagnosed to have GDM by the IADPSG criteria, only 24 were diagnosed by DIPSI. The DIPSI non-fasting OGTT 2-h VPG cut point of 140 mg/dl (7.8 mmol/l) had a very low sensitivity when compared to the WHO 1999 criteria (sensitivity 27.7 %, specificity 97.7 %) and IADPSG criteria (sensitivity 22.6 %, specificity 97.8 %). CONCLUSIONS: The DIPSI non-fasting OGTT criteria cannot be recommended for diagnosis of GDM due to its low sensitivity. Thus, as a single-step diagnostic test for GDM, the fasting OGTT needs to be done. When this is not possible, the well-established two-step procedure using the 50-g glucose challenge test as an initial screening test, followed by the diagnostic fasting OGTT, can be continued.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4239809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42398092014-11-25 Comparison of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus by oral glucose tolerance tests done in the non-fasting (random) and fasting states Mohan, Viswanathan Mahalakshmi, Manni Mohanraj Bhavadharini, Balaji Maheswari, Kumar Kalaiyarasi, Gunasekaran Anjana, Ranjit Mohan Uma, Ram Usha, Sriram Deepa, Mohan Unnikrishnan, Ranjit Pastakia, Sonak D. Malanda, Belma Belton, Anne Kayal, Arivudainambi Acta Diabetol Original Article AIM: The Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of India (DIPSI) guidelines recommend the non-fasting 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) as a single-step screening and diagnostic test for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The aim of this study was to compare the DIPSI criteria with the World Health Organization (WHO) 1999 and the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria for GDM. METHODS: A total of 1,031 pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in urban and rural Tamil Nadu, India, underwent a 75-g OGTT in both non-fasting and fasting states, 2–3 days apart. Venous plasma glucose was measured using an autoanalyser, and GDM was diagnosed by DIPSI, WHO 1999 and IADPSG criteria. RESULTS: Of the 83 women identified to have GDM by WHO 1999 criteria, only 23 were diagnosed by DIPSI criteria. Of the 106 women diagnosed to have GDM by the IADPSG criteria, only 24 were diagnosed by DIPSI. The DIPSI non-fasting OGTT 2-h VPG cut point of 140 mg/dl (7.8 mmol/l) had a very low sensitivity when compared to the WHO 1999 criteria (sensitivity 27.7 %, specificity 97.7 %) and IADPSG criteria (sensitivity 22.6 %, specificity 97.8 %). CONCLUSIONS: The DIPSI non-fasting OGTT criteria cannot be recommended for diagnosis of GDM due to its low sensitivity. Thus, as a single-step diagnostic test for GDM, the fasting OGTT needs to be done. When this is not possible, the well-established two-step procedure using the 50-g glucose challenge test as an initial screening test, followed by the diagnostic fasting OGTT, can be continued. Springer Milan 2014-10-15 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4239809/ /pubmed/25315629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00592-014-0660-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mohan, Viswanathan
Mahalakshmi, Manni Mohanraj
Bhavadharini, Balaji
Maheswari, Kumar
Kalaiyarasi, Gunasekaran
Anjana, Ranjit Mohan
Uma, Ram
Usha, Sriram
Deepa, Mohan
Unnikrishnan, Ranjit
Pastakia, Sonak D.
Malanda, Belma
Belton, Anne
Kayal, Arivudainambi
Comparison of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus by oral glucose tolerance tests done in the non-fasting (random) and fasting states
title Comparison of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus by oral glucose tolerance tests done in the non-fasting (random) and fasting states
title_full Comparison of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus by oral glucose tolerance tests done in the non-fasting (random) and fasting states
title_fullStr Comparison of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus by oral glucose tolerance tests done in the non-fasting (random) and fasting states
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus by oral glucose tolerance tests done in the non-fasting (random) and fasting states
title_short Comparison of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus by oral glucose tolerance tests done in the non-fasting (random) and fasting states
title_sort comparison of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus by oral glucose tolerance tests done in the non-fasting (random) and fasting states
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4239809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25315629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00592-014-0660-5
work_keys_str_mv AT mohanviswanathan comparisonofscreeningforgestationaldiabetesmellitusbyoralglucosetolerancetestsdoneinthenonfastingrandomandfastingstates
AT mahalakshmimannimohanraj comparisonofscreeningforgestationaldiabetesmellitusbyoralglucosetolerancetestsdoneinthenonfastingrandomandfastingstates
AT bhavadharinibalaji comparisonofscreeningforgestationaldiabetesmellitusbyoralglucosetolerancetestsdoneinthenonfastingrandomandfastingstates
AT maheswarikumar comparisonofscreeningforgestationaldiabetesmellitusbyoralglucosetolerancetestsdoneinthenonfastingrandomandfastingstates
AT kalaiyarasigunasekaran comparisonofscreeningforgestationaldiabetesmellitusbyoralglucosetolerancetestsdoneinthenonfastingrandomandfastingstates
AT anjanaranjitmohan comparisonofscreeningforgestationaldiabetesmellitusbyoralglucosetolerancetestsdoneinthenonfastingrandomandfastingstates
AT umaram comparisonofscreeningforgestationaldiabetesmellitusbyoralglucosetolerancetestsdoneinthenonfastingrandomandfastingstates
AT ushasriram comparisonofscreeningforgestationaldiabetesmellitusbyoralglucosetolerancetestsdoneinthenonfastingrandomandfastingstates
AT deepamohan comparisonofscreeningforgestationaldiabetesmellitusbyoralglucosetolerancetestsdoneinthenonfastingrandomandfastingstates
AT unnikrishnanranjit comparisonofscreeningforgestationaldiabetesmellitusbyoralglucosetolerancetestsdoneinthenonfastingrandomandfastingstates
AT pastakiasonakd comparisonofscreeningforgestationaldiabetesmellitusbyoralglucosetolerancetestsdoneinthenonfastingrandomandfastingstates
AT malandabelma comparisonofscreeningforgestationaldiabetesmellitusbyoralglucosetolerancetestsdoneinthenonfastingrandomandfastingstates
AT beltonanne comparisonofscreeningforgestationaldiabetesmellitusbyoralglucosetolerancetestsdoneinthenonfastingrandomandfastingstates
AT kayalarivudainambi comparisonofscreeningforgestationaldiabetesmellitusbyoralglucosetolerancetestsdoneinthenonfastingrandomandfastingstates