Cargando…

Estimating Orientation Using Magnetic and Inertial Sensors and Different Sensor Fusion Approaches: Accuracy Assessment in Manual and Locomotion Tasks

Magnetic and inertial measurement units are an emerging technology to obtain 3D orientation of body segments in human movement analysis. In this respect, sensor fusion is used to limit the drift errors resulting from the gyroscope data integration by exploiting accelerometer and magnetic aiding sens...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bergamini, Elena, Ligorio, Gabriele, Summa, Aurora, Vannozzi, Giuseppe, Cappozzo, Aurelio, Sabatini, Angelo Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4239903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25302810
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s141018625
_version_ 1782345660744335360
author Bergamini, Elena
Ligorio, Gabriele
Summa, Aurora
Vannozzi, Giuseppe
Cappozzo, Aurelio
Sabatini, Angelo Maria
author_facet Bergamini, Elena
Ligorio, Gabriele
Summa, Aurora
Vannozzi, Giuseppe
Cappozzo, Aurelio
Sabatini, Angelo Maria
author_sort Bergamini, Elena
collection PubMed
description Magnetic and inertial measurement units are an emerging technology to obtain 3D orientation of body segments in human movement analysis. In this respect, sensor fusion is used to limit the drift errors resulting from the gyroscope data integration by exploiting accelerometer and magnetic aiding sensors. The present study aims at investigating the effectiveness of sensor fusion methods under different experimental conditions. Manual and locomotion tasks, differing in time duration, measurement volume, presence/absence of static phases, and out-of-plane movements, were performed by six subjects, and recorded by one unit located on the forearm or the lower trunk, respectively. Two sensor fusion methods, representative of the stochastic (Extended Kalman Filter) and complementary (Non-linear observer) filtering, were selected, and their accuracy was assessed in terms of attitude (pitch and roll angles) and heading (yaw angle) errors using stereophotogrammetric data as a reference. The sensor fusion approaches provided significantly more accurate results than gyroscope data integration. Accuracy improved mostly for heading and when the movement exhibited stationary phases, evenly distributed 3D rotations, it occurred in a small volume, and its duration was greater than approximately 20 s. These results were independent from the specific sensor fusion method used. Practice guidelines for improving the outcome accuracy are provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4239903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42399032014-11-21 Estimating Orientation Using Magnetic and Inertial Sensors and Different Sensor Fusion Approaches: Accuracy Assessment in Manual and Locomotion Tasks Bergamini, Elena Ligorio, Gabriele Summa, Aurora Vannozzi, Giuseppe Cappozzo, Aurelio Sabatini, Angelo Maria Sensors (Basel) Article Magnetic and inertial measurement units are an emerging technology to obtain 3D orientation of body segments in human movement analysis. In this respect, sensor fusion is used to limit the drift errors resulting from the gyroscope data integration by exploiting accelerometer and magnetic aiding sensors. The present study aims at investigating the effectiveness of sensor fusion methods under different experimental conditions. Manual and locomotion tasks, differing in time duration, measurement volume, presence/absence of static phases, and out-of-plane movements, were performed by six subjects, and recorded by one unit located on the forearm or the lower trunk, respectively. Two sensor fusion methods, representative of the stochastic (Extended Kalman Filter) and complementary (Non-linear observer) filtering, were selected, and their accuracy was assessed in terms of attitude (pitch and roll angles) and heading (yaw angle) errors using stereophotogrammetric data as a reference. The sensor fusion approaches provided significantly more accurate results than gyroscope data integration. Accuracy improved mostly for heading and when the movement exhibited stationary phases, evenly distributed 3D rotations, it occurred in a small volume, and its duration was greater than approximately 20 s. These results were independent from the specific sensor fusion method used. Practice guidelines for improving the outcome accuracy are provided. MDPI 2014-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4239903/ /pubmed/25302810 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s141018625 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bergamini, Elena
Ligorio, Gabriele
Summa, Aurora
Vannozzi, Giuseppe
Cappozzo, Aurelio
Sabatini, Angelo Maria
Estimating Orientation Using Magnetic and Inertial Sensors and Different Sensor Fusion Approaches: Accuracy Assessment in Manual and Locomotion Tasks
title Estimating Orientation Using Magnetic and Inertial Sensors and Different Sensor Fusion Approaches: Accuracy Assessment in Manual and Locomotion Tasks
title_full Estimating Orientation Using Magnetic and Inertial Sensors and Different Sensor Fusion Approaches: Accuracy Assessment in Manual and Locomotion Tasks
title_fullStr Estimating Orientation Using Magnetic and Inertial Sensors and Different Sensor Fusion Approaches: Accuracy Assessment in Manual and Locomotion Tasks
title_full_unstemmed Estimating Orientation Using Magnetic and Inertial Sensors and Different Sensor Fusion Approaches: Accuracy Assessment in Manual and Locomotion Tasks
title_short Estimating Orientation Using Magnetic and Inertial Sensors and Different Sensor Fusion Approaches: Accuracy Assessment in Manual and Locomotion Tasks
title_sort estimating orientation using magnetic and inertial sensors and different sensor fusion approaches: accuracy assessment in manual and locomotion tasks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4239903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25302810
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s141018625
work_keys_str_mv AT bergaminielena estimatingorientationusingmagneticandinertialsensorsanddifferentsensorfusionapproachesaccuracyassessmentinmanualandlocomotiontasks
AT ligoriogabriele estimatingorientationusingmagneticandinertialsensorsanddifferentsensorfusionapproachesaccuracyassessmentinmanualandlocomotiontasks
AT summaaurora estimatingorientationusingmagneticandinertialsensorsanddifferentsensorfusionapproachesaccuracyassessmentinmanualandlocomotiontasks
AT vannozzigiuseppe estimatingorientationusingmagneticandinertialsensorsanddifferentsensorfusionapproachesaccuracyassessmentinmanualandlocomotiontasks
AT cappozzoaurelio estimatingorientationusingmagneticandinertialsensorsanddifferentsensorfusionapproachesaccuracyassessmentinmanualandlocomotiontasks
AT sabatiniangelomaria estimatingorientationusingmagneticandinertialsensorsanddifferentsensorfusionapproachesaccuracyassessmentinmanualandlocomotiontasks