Cargando…
Estimating Orientation Using Magnetic and Inertial Sensors and Different Sensor Fusion Approaches: Accuracy Assessment in Manual and Locomotion Tasks
Magnetic and inertial measurement units are an emerging technology to obtain 3D orientation of body segments in human movement analysis. In this respect, sensor fusion is used to limit the drift errors resulting from the gyroscope data integration by exploiting accelerometer and magnetic aiding sens...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4239903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25302810 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s141018625 |
_version_ | 1782345660744335360 |
---|---|
author | Bergamini, Elena Ligorio, Gabriele Summa, Aurora Vannozzi, Giuseppe Cappozzo, Aurelio Sabatini, Angelo Maria |
author_facet | Bergamini, Elena Ligorio, Gabriele Summa, Aurora Vannozzi, Giuseppe Cappozzo, Aurelio Sabatini, Angelo Maria |
author_sort | Bergamini, Elena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Magnetic and inertial measurement units are an emerging technology to obtain 3D orientation of body segments in human movement analysis. In this respect, sensor fusion is used to limit the drift errors resulting from the gyroscope data integration by exploiting accelerometer and magnetic aiding sensors. The present study aims at investigating the effectiveness of sensor fusion methods under different experimental conditions. Manual and locomotion tasks, differing in time duration, measurement volume, presence/absence of static phases, and out-of-plane movements, were performed by six subjects, and recorded by one unit located on the forearm or the lower trunk, respectively. Two sensor fusion methods, representative of the stochastic (Extended Kalman Filter) and complementary (Non-linear observer) filtering, were selected, and their accuracy was assessed in terms of attitude (pitch and roll angles) and heading (yaw angle) errors using stereophotogrammetric data as a reference. The sensor fusion approaches provided significantly more accurate results than gyroscope data integration. Accuracy improved mostly for heading and when the movement exhibited stationary phases, evenly distributed 3D rotations, it occurred in a small volume, and its duration was greater than approximately 20 s. These results were independent from the specific sensor fusion method used. Practice guidelines for improving the outcome accuracy are provided. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4239903 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42399032014-11-21 Estimating Orientation Using Magnetic and Inertial Sensors and Different Sensor Fusion Approaches: Accuracy Assessment in Manual and Locomotion Tasks Bergamini, Elena Ligorio, Gabriele Summa, Aurora Vannozzi, Giuseppe Cappozzo, Aurelio Sabatini, Angelo Maria Sensors (Basel) Article Magnetic and inertial measurement units are an emerging technology to obtain 3D orientation of body segments in human movement analysis. In this respect, sensor fusion is used to limit the drift errors resulting from the gyroscope data integration by exploiting accelerometer and magnetic aiding sensors. The present study aims at investigating the effectiveness of sensor fusion methods under different experimental conditions. Manual and locomotion tasks, differing in time duration, measurement volume, presence/absence of static phases, and out-of-plane movements, were performed by six subjects, and recorded by one unit located on the forearm or the lower trunk, respectively. Two sensor fusion methods, representative of the stochastic (Extended Kalman Filter) and complementary (Non-linear observer) filtering, were selected, and their accuracy was assessed in terms of attitude (pitch and roll angles) and heading (yaw angle) errors using stereophotogrammetric data as a reference. The sensor fusion approaches provided significantly more accurate results than gyroscope data integration. Accuracy improved mostly for heading and when the movement exhibited stationary phases, evenly distributed 3D rotations, it occurred in a small volume, and its duration was greater than approximately 20 s. These results were independent from the specific sensor fusion method used. Practice guidelines for improving the outcome accuracy are provided. MDPI 2014-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4239903/ /pubmed/25302810 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s141018625 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bergamini, Elena Ligorio, Gabriele Summa, Aurora Vannozzi, Giuseppe Cappozzo, Aurelio Sabatini, Angelo Maria Estimating Orientation Using Magnetic and Inertial Sensors and Different Sensor Fusion Approaches: Accuracy Assessment in Manual and Locomotion Tasks |
title | Estimating Orientation Using Magnetic and Inertial Sensors and Different Sensor Fusion Approaches: Accuracy Assessment in Manual and Locomotion Tasks |
title_full | Estimating Orientation Using Magnetic and Inertial Sensors and Different Sensor Fusion Approaches: Accuracy Assessment in Manual and Locomotion Tasks |
title_fullStr | Estimating Orientation Using Magnetic and Inertial Sensors and Different Sensor Fusion Approaches: Accuracy Assessment in Manual and Locomotion Tasks |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimating Orientation Using Magnetic and Inertial Sensors and Different Sensor Fusion Approaches: Accuracy Assessment in Manual and Locomotion Tasks |
title_short | Estimating Orientation Using Magnetic and Inertial Sensors and Different Sensor Fusion Approaches: Accuracy Assessment in Manual and Locomotion Tasks |
title_sort | estimating orientation using magnetic and inertial sensors and different sensor fusion approaches: accuracy assessment in manual and locomotion tasks |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4239903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25302810 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s141018625 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bergaminielena estimatingorientationusingmagneticandinertialsensorsanddifferentsensorfusionapproachesaccuracyassessmentinmanualandlocomotiontasks AT ligoriogabriele estimatingorientationusingmagneticandinertialsensorsanddifferentsensorfusionapproachesaccuracyassessmentinmanualandlocomotiontasks AT summaaurora estimatingorientationusingmagneticandinertialsensorsanddifferentsensorfusionapproachesaccuracyassessmentinmanualandlocomotiontasks AT vannozzigiuseppe estimatingorientationusingmagneticandinertialsensorsanddifferentsensorfusionapproachesaccuracyassessmentinmanualandlocomotiontasks AT cappozzoaurelio estimatingorientationusingmagneticandinertialsensorsanddifferentsensorfusionapproachesaccuracyassessmentinmanualandlocomotiontasks AT sabatiniangelomaria estimatingorientationusingmagneticandinertialsensorsanddifferentsensorfusionapproachesaccuracyassessmentinmanualandlocomotiontasks |