Cargando…
Understanding quality improvement at scale in general practice: a qualitative evaluation of a COPD improvement programme
BACKGROUND: A growing body of knowledge exists to guide efforts to improve the organisation and delivery of health care, most of which is based on work carried out in hospitals. It is uncertain how transferable this knowledge is to primary care. AIM: To understand the enablers and constraints to imp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College of General Practitioners
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4240146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25452538 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X682801 |
_version_ | 1782345689733267456 |
---|---|
author | Marshall, Martin Mountford, James Gamet, Kirsten Gungor, Gulsen Burke, Conor Hudson, Robyn Morris, Steve Patel, Nishma Koczan, Phil Meaker, Rob Chantler, Cyril Roberts, Christopher Michael |
author_facet | Marshall, Martin Mountford, James Gamet, Kirsten Gungor, Gulsen Burke, Conor Hudson, Robyn Morris, Steve Patel, Nishma Koczan, Phil Meaker, Rob Chantler, Cyril Roberts, Christopher Michael |
author_sort | Marshall, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A growing body of knowledge exists to guide efforts to improve the organisation and delivery of health care, most of which is based on work carried out in hospitals. It is uncertain how transferable this knowledge is to primary care. AIM: To understand the enablers and constraints to implementing a large-scale quality improvement programme in general practice, designed to improve care for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. DESIGN AND SETTING: A qualitative study of 189 general practices in a socioeconomically and ethnically-mixed, urban area in east London, UK. METHOD: Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with people leading the programme and 17 in-depth interviews with those participating in it. Participants were local health system leaders, clinicians, and managers. A theoretical framework derived from evidence-based guidance for improvement programmes was used to interpret the findings. A complex improvement intervention took place with social and technical elements including training and mentorship, guidance, analytical tools, and data feedback. RESULTS: Practice staff wanted to participate in and learn from well-designed collaborative improvement projects. Nevertheless, there were limitations in the capacities and capabilities of the workforce to undertake systematic improvement, significant problems with access to and the quality of data, and tensions between the narrative-based generalist orientation of many primary care clinicians and the quantitative single-disease orientation that has characterised much of the quality improvement movement to date. CONCLUSION: Improvement guidance derived largely from hospital-based studies is, for the most part, applicable to improvement efforts in primary care settings, although large-scale change in general practice presents some particular challenges. These need to be better understood and addressed if improvement initiatives are to be effective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4240146 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Royal College of General Practitioners |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42401462014-12-11 Understanding quality improvement at scale in general practice: a qualitative evaluation of a COPD improvement programme Marshall, Martin Mountford, James Gamet, Kirsten Gungor, Gulsen Burke, Conor Hudson, Robyn Morris, Steve Patel, Nishma Koczan, Phil Meaker, Rob Chantler, Cyril Roberts, Christopher Michael Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: A growing body of knowledge exists to guide efforts to improve the organisation and delivery of health care, most of which is based on work carried out in hospitals. It is uncertain how transferable this knowledge is to primary care. AIM: To understand the enablers and constraints to implementing a large-scale quality improvement programme in general practice, designed to improve care for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. DESIGN AND SETTING: A qualitative study of 189 general practices in a socioeconomically and ethnically-mixed, urban area in east London, UK. METHOD: Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with people leading the programme and 17 in-depth interviews with those participating in it. Participants were local health system leaders, clinicians, and managers. A theoretical framework derived from evidence-based guidance for improvement programmes was used to interpret the findings. A complex improvement intervention took place with social and technical elements including training and mentorship, guidance, analytical tools, and data feedback. RESULTS: Practice staff wanted to participate in and learn from well-designed collaborative improvement projects. Nevertheless, there were limitations in the capacities and capabilities of the workforce to undertake systematic improvement, significant problems with access to and the quality of data, and tensions between the narrative-based generalist orientation of many primary care clinicians and the quantitative single-disease orientation that has characterised much of the quality improvement movement to date. CONCLUSION: Improvement guidance derived largely from hospital-based studies is, for the most part, applicable to improvement efforts in primary care settings, although large-scale change in general practice presents some particular challenges. These need to be better understood and addressed if improvement initiatives are to be effective. Royal College of General Practitioners 2014-12 2014-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4240146/ /pubmed/25452538 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X682801 Text en © British Journal of General Practice 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an OpenAccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Marshall, Martin Mountford, James Gamet, Kirsten Gungor, Gulsen Burke, Conor Hudson, Robyn Morris, Steve Patel, Nishma Koczan, Phil Meaker, Rob Chantler, Cyril Roberts, Christopher Michael Understanding quality improvement at scale in general practice: a qualitative evaluation of a COPD improvement programme |
title | Understanding quality improvement at scale in general practice: a qualitative evaluation of a COPD improvement programme |
title_full | Understanding quality improvement at scale in general practice: a qualitative evaluation of a COPD improvement programme |
title_fullStr | Understanding quality improvement at scale in general practice: a qualitative evaluation of a COPD improvement programme |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding quality improvement at scale in general practice: a qualitative evaluation of a COPD improvement programme |
title_short | Understanding quality improvement at scale in general practice: a qualitative evaluation of a COPD improvement programme |
title_sort | understanding quality improvement at scale in general practice: a qualitative evaluation of a copd improvement programme |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4240146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25452538 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X682801 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marshallmartin understandingqualityimprovementatscaleingeneralpracticeaqualitativeevaluationofacopdimprovementprogramme AT mountfordjames understandingqualityimprovementatscaleingeneralpracticeaqualitativeevaluationofacopdimprovementprogramme AT gametkirsten understandingqualityimprovementatscaleingeneralpracticeaqualitativeevaluationofacopdimprovementprogramme AT gungorgulsen understandingqualityimprovementatscaleingeneralpracticeaqualitativeevaluationofacopdimprovementprogramme AT burkeconor understandingqualityimprovementatscaleingeneralpracticeaqualitativeevaluationofacopdimprovementprogramme AT hudsonrobyn understandingqualityimprovementatscaleingeneralpracticeaqualitativeevaluationofacopdimprovementprogramme AT morrissteve understandingqualityimprovementatscaleingeneralpracticeaqualitativeevaluationofacopdimprovementprogramme AT patelnishma understandingqualityimprovementatscaleingeneralpracticeaqualitativeevaluationofacopdimprovementprogramme AT koczanphil understandingqualityimprovementatscaleingeneralpracticeaqualitativeevaluationofacopdimprovementprogramme AT meakerrob understandingqualityimprovementatscaleingeneralpracticeaqualitativeevaluationofacopdimprovementprogramme AT chantlercyril understandingqualityimprovementatscaleingeneralpracticeaqualitativeevaluationofacopdimprovementprogramme AT robertschristophermichael understandingqualityimprovementatscaleingeneralpracticeaqualitativeevaluationofacopdimprovementprogramme |