Cargando…

Understanding quality improvement at scale in general practice: a qualitative evaluation of a COPD improvement programme

BACKGROUND: A growing body of knowledge exists to guide efforts to improve the organisation and delivery of health care, most of which is based on work carried out in hospitals. It is uncertain how transferable this knowledge is to primary care. AIM: To understand the enablers and constraints to imp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marshall, Martin, Mountford, James, Gamet, Kirsten, Gungor, Gulsen, Burke, Conor, Hudson, Robyn, Morris, Steve, Patel, Nishma, Koczan, Phil, Meaker, Rob, Chantler, Cyril, Roberts, Christopher Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4240146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25452538
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X682801
_version_ 1782345689733267456
author Marshall, Martin
Mountford, James
Gamet, Kirsten
Gungor, Gulsen
Burke, Conor
Hudson, Robyn
Morris, Steve
Patel, Nishma
Koczan, Phil
Meaker, Rob
Chantler, Cyril
Roberts, Christopher Michael
author_facet Marshall, Martin
Mountford, James
Gamet, Kirsten
Gungor, Gulsen
Burke, Conor
Hudson, Robyn
Morris, Steve
Patel, Nishma
Koczan, Phil
Meaker, Rob
Chantler, Cyril
Roberts, Christopher Michael
author_sort Marshall, Martin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A growing body of knowledge exists to guide efforts to improve the organisation and delivery of health care, most of which is based on work carried out in hospitals. It is uncertain how transferable this knowledge is to primary care. AIM: To understand the enablers and constraints to implementing a large-scale quality improvement programme in general practice, designed to improve care for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. DESIGN AND SETTING: A qualitative study of 189 general practices in a socioeconomically and ethnically-mixed, urban area in east London, UK. METHOD: Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with people leading the programme and 17 in-depth interviews with those participating in it. Participants were local health system leaders, clinicians, and managers. A theoretical framework derived from evidence-based guidance for improvement programmes was used to interpret the findings. A complex improvement intervention took place with social and technical elements including training and mentorship, guidance, analytical tools, and data feedback. RESULTS: Practice staff wanted to participate in and learn from well-designed collaborative improvement projects. Nevertheless, there were limitations in the capacities and capabilities of the workforce to undertake systematic improvement, significant problems with access to and the quality of data, and tensions between the narrative-based generalist orientation of many primary care clinicians and the quantitative single-disease orientation that has characterised much of the quality improvement movement to date. CONCLUSION: Improvement guidance derived largely from hospital-based studies is, for the most part, applicable to improvement efforts in primary care settings, although large-scale change in general practice presents some particular challenges. These need to be better understood and addressed if improvement initiatives are to be effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4240146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42401462014-12-11 Understanding quality improvement at scale in general practice: a qualitative evaluation of a COPD improvement programme Marshall, Martin Mountford, James Gamet, Kirsten Gungor, Gulsen Burke, Conor Hudson, Robyn Morris, Steve Patel, Nishma Koczan, Phil Meaker, Rob Chantler, Cyril Roberts, Christopher Michael Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: A growing body of knowledge exists to guide efforts to improve the organisation and delivery of health care, most of which is based on work carried out in hospitals. It is uncertain how transferable this knowledge is to primary care. AIM: To understand the enablers and constraints to implementing a large-scale quality improvement programme in general practice, designed to improve care for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. DESIGN AND SETTING: A qualitative study of 189 general practices in a socioeconomically and ethnically-mixed, urban area in east London, UK. METHOD: Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with people leading the programme and 17 in-depth interviews with those participating in it. Participants were local health system leaders, clinicians, and managers. A theoretical framework derived from evidence-based guidance for improvement programmes was used to interpret the findings. A complex improvement intervention took place with social and technical elements including training and mentorship, guidance, analytical tools, and data feedback. RESULTS: Practice staff wanted to participate in and learn from well-designed collaborative improvement projects. Nevertheless, there were limitations in the capacities and capabilities of the workforce to undertake systematic improvement, significant problems with access to and the quality of data, and tensions between the narrative-based generalist orientation of many primary care clinicians and the quantitative single-disease orientation that has characterised much of the quality improvement movement to date. CONCLUSION: Improvement guidance derived largely from hospital-based studies is, for the most part, applicable to improvement efforts in primary care settings, although large-scale change in general practice presents some particular challenges. These need to be better understood and addressed if improvement initiatives are to be effective. Royal College of General Practitioners 2014-12 2014-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4240146/ /pubmed/25452538 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X682801 Text en © British Journal of General Practice 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an OpenAccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Marshall, Martin
Mountford, James
Gamet, Kirsten
Gungor, Gulsen
Burke, Conor
Hudson, Robyn
Morris, Steve
Patel, Nishma
Koczan, Phil
Meaker, Rob
Chantler, Cyril
Roberts, Christopher Michael
Understanding quality improvement at scale in general practice: a qualitative evaluation of a COPD improvement programme
title Understanding quality improvement at scale in general practice: a qualitative evaluation of a COPD improvement programme
title_full Understanding quality improvement at scale in general practice: a qualitative evaluation of a COPD improvement programme
title_fullStr Understanding quality improvement at scale in general practice: a qualitative evaluation of a COPD improvement programme
title_full_unstemmed Understanding quality improvement at scale in general practice: a qualitative evaluation of a COPD improvement programme
title_short Understanding quality improvement at scale in general practice: a qualitative evaluation of a COPD improvement programme
title_sort understanding quality improvement at scale in general practice: a qualitative evaluation of a copd improvement programme
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4240146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25452538
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X682801
work_keys_str_mv AT marshallmartin understandingqualityimprovementatscaleingeneralpracticeaqualitativeevaluationofacopdimprovementprogramme
AT mountfordjames understandingqualityimprovementatscaleingeneralpracticeaqualitativeevaluationofacopdimprovementprogramme
AT gametkirsten understandingqualityimprovementatscaleingeneralpracticeaqualitativeevaluationofacopdimprovementprogramme
AT gungorgulsen understandingqualityimprovementatscaleingeneralpracticeaqualitativeevaluationofacopdimprovementprogramme
AT burkeconor understandingqualityimprovementatscaleingeneralpracticeaqualitativeevaluationofacopdimprovementprogramme
AT hudsonrobyn understandingqualityimprovementatscaleingeneralpracticeaqualitativeevaluationofacopdimprovementprogramme
AT morrissteve understandingqualityimprovementatscaleingeneralpracticeaqualitativeevaluationofacopdimprovementprogramme
AT patelnishma understandingqualityimprovementatscaleingeneralpracticeaqualitativeevaluationofacopdimprovementprogramme
AT koczanphil understandingqualityimprovementatscaleingeneralpracticeaqualitativeevaluationofacopdimprovementprogramme
AT meakerrob understandingqualityimprovementatscaleingeneralpracticeaqualitativeevaluationofacopdimprovementprogramme
AT chantlercyril understandingqualityimprovementatscaleingeneralpracticeaqualitativeevaluationofacopdimprovementprogramme
AT robertschristophermichael understandingqualityimprovementatscaleingeneralpracticeaqualitativeevaluationofacopdimprovementprogramme