Cargando…

Unconscious relational encoding depends on hippocampus

Textbooks divide between human memory systems based on consciousness. Hippocampus is thought to support only conscious encoding, while neocortex supports both conscious and unconscious encoding. We tested whether processing modes, not consciousness, divide between memory systems in three neuroimagin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duss, Simone B., Reber, Thomas P., Hänggi, Jürgen, Schwab, Simon, Wiest, Roland, Müri, René M., Brugger, Peter, Gutbrod, Klemens, Henke, Katharina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4240286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25273998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awu270
_version_ 1782345704812838912
author Duss, Simone B.
Reber, Thomas P.
Hänggi, Jürgen
Schwab, Simon
Wiest, Roland
Müri, René M.
Brugger, Peter
Gutbrod, Klemens
Henke, Katharina
author_facet Duss, Simone B.
Reber, Thomas P.
Hänggi, Jürgen
Schwab, Simon
Wiest, Roland
Müri, René M.
Brugger, Peter
Gutbrod, Klemens
Henke, Katharina
author_sort Duss, Simone B.
collection PubMed
description Textbooks divide between human memory systems based on consciousness. Hippocampus is thought to support only conscious encoding, while neocortex supports both conscious and unconscious encoding. We tested whether processing modes, not consciousness, divide between memory systems in three neuroimaging experiments with 11 amnesic patients (mean age = 45.55 years, standard deviation = 8.74, range = 23–60) and 11 matched healthy control subjects. Examined processing modes were single item versus relational encoding with only relational encoding hypothesized to depend on hippocampus. Participants encoded and later retrieved either single words or new relations between words. Consciousness of encoding was excluded by subliminal (invisible) word presentation. Amnesic patients and controls performed equally well on the single item task activating prefrontal cortex. But only the controls succeeded on the relational task activating the hippocampus, while amnesic patients failed as a group. Hence, unconscious relational encoding, but not unconscious single item encoding, depended on hippocampus. Yet, three patients performed normally on unconscious relational encoding in spite of amnesia capitalizing on spared hippocampal tissue and connections to language cortex. This pattern of results suggests that processing modes divide between memory systems, while consciousness divides between levels of function within a memory system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4240286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42402862014-11-21 Unconscious relational encoding depends on hippocampus Duss, Simone B. Reber, Thomas P. Hänggi, Jürgen Schwab, Simon Wiest, Roland Müri, René M. Brugger, Peter Gutbrod, Klemens Henke, Katharina Brain Original Articles Textbooks divide between human memory systems based on consciousness. Hippocampus is thought to support only conscious encoding, while neocortex supports both conscious and unconscious encoding. We tested whether processing modes, not consciousness, divide between memory systems in three neuroimaging experiments with 11 amnesic patients (mean age = 45.55 years, standard deviation = 8.74, range = 23–60) and 11 matched healthy control subjects. Examined processing modes were single item versus relational encoding with only relational encoding hypothesized to depend on hippocampus. Participants encoded and later retrieved either single words or new relations between words. Consciousness of encoding was excluded by subliminal (invisible) word presentation. Amnesic patients and controls performed equally well on the single item task activating prefrontal cortex. But only the controls succeeded on the relational task activating the hippocampus, while amnesic patients failed as a group. Hence, unconscious relational encoding, but not unconscious single item encoding, depended on hippocampus. Yet, three patients performed normally on unconscious relational encoding in spite of amnesia capitalizing on spared hippocampal tissue and connections to language cortex. This pattern of results suggests that processing modes divide between memory systems, while consciousness divides between levels of function within a memory system. Oxford University Press 2014-12 2014-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4240286/ /pubmed/25273998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awu270 Text en © The Author (2014). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Duss, Simone B.
Reber, Thomas P.
Hänggi, Jürgen
Schwab, Simon
Wiest, Roland
Müri, René M.
Brugger, Peter
Gutbrod, Klemens
Henke, Katharina
Unconscious relational encoding depends on hippocampus
title Unconscious relational encoding depends on hippocampus
title_full Unconscious relational encoding depends on hippocampus
title_fullStr Unconscious relational encoding depends on hippocampus
title_full_unstemmed Unconscious relational encoding depends on hippocampus
title_short Unconscious relational encoding depends on hippocampus
title_sort unconscious relational encoding depends on hippocampus
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4240286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25273998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awu270
work_keys_str_mv AT dusssimoneb unconsciousrelationalencodingdependsonhippocampus
AT reberthomasp unconsciousrelationalencodingdependsonhippocampus
AT hanggijurgen unconsciousrelationalencodingdependsonhippocampus
AT schwabsimon unconsciousrelationalencodingdependsonhippocampus
AT wiestroland unconsciousrelationalencodingdependsonhippocampus
AT murirenem unconsciousrelationalencodingdependsonhippocampus
AT bruggerpeter unconsciousrelationalencodingdependsonhippocampus
AT gutbrodklemens unconsciousrelationalencodingdependsonhippocampus
AT henkekatharina unconsciousrelationalencodingdependsonhippocampus