Cargando…

Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation in Treatment of Fractures of Proximal Femur

INTRODUCTION: Fractures of the proximal femur and hip are relatively common injuries in adults and common source of morbidity and mortality among the elderly. Many methods have been recommended for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospective analyzed all the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sadic, Sahmir, Custovic, Svemir, Jasarevic, Mahir, Fazlic, Mirsad, Smajic, Nedim, Hrustic, Asmir, Vujadinovic, Aleksandar, Krupic, Ferid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4240330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25568527
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2014.68.173-177
_version_ 1782345709853343744
author Sadic, Sahmir
Custovic, Svemir
Jasarevic, Mahir
Fazlic, Mirsad
Smajic, Nedim
Hrustic, Asmir
Vujadinovic, Aleksandar
Krupic, Ferid
author_facet Sadic, Sahmir
Custovic, Svemir
Jasarevic, Mahir
Fazlic, Mirsad
Smajic, Nedim
Hrustic, Asmir
Vujadinovic, Aleksandar
Krupic, Ferid
author_sort Sadic, Sahmir
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Fractures of the proximal femur and hip are relatively common injuries in adults and common source of morbidity and mortality among the elderly. Many methods have been recommended for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospective analyzed all the patients with fractures of the hip treated with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) at the Clinic of Orthopedic and Traumatology, University Clinical Centre Tuzla from the first of January 2012 to 31 December 2012 years. The study included 63 patients averaged 73.6±11.9 years (range, 29 to 88 years). Fracture type was classified as intertrochanteric (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen classification 31.A.1, A.2 and A.3) and subtrochanteric fractures (Seinsheimer classification). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The ratio between the genders female-male was 1.6:1. There was statistically significant difference prevalence of female compared to male patients (p=0.012). There were 31 left and 32 right hip fractured. Low energy trauma was the cause of fractures in 57(90.5%) patients. Averaged waiting time for hospitalization was 3.2±7.5 days (range, 0 to 32 days). 44 patients were admitted the same day upon injuring. The average waiting time for the treatment was 3.6±5.7 days. The ratio between with or without co-existent disease was 4.7:1. During the three months postoperatively with ASA score 3 and 4 six patients died. There were no significant differences in deaths from ASA score 1 and 2 (p=0.52). Reoperation for the treatment of implant or fracture-related complications was required in three (4.7%) patients (infection, reimplantation and extraction). Three patient developed deep vein thrombosis. Statistically significant difference was found in the deaths in the first three months compared to the next three months (p=0.02). We found statistically significant difference between pre-injury and postoperative mobility score (p=0.0001). CONCLUSION: PFNA is an excellent device for osteosynthesis as it can be easily inserted. Moreover, it provides stable fixation, which allows early full weightbearing mobilization of the patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4240330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42403302015-01-07 Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation in Treatment of Fractures of Proximal Femur Sadic, Sahmir Custovic, Svemir Jasarevic, Mahir Fazlic, Mirsad Smajic, Nedim Hrustic, Asmir Vujadinovic, Aleksandar Krupic, Ferid Med Arch Original Article INTRODUCTION: Fractures of the proximal femur and hip are relatively common injuries in adults and common source of morbidity and mortality among the elderly. Many methods have been recommended for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospective analyzed all the patients with fractures of the hip treated with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) at the Clinic of Orthopedic and Traumatology, University Clinical Centre Tuzla from the first of January 2012 to 31 December 2012 years. The study included 63 patients averaged 73.6±11.9 years (range, 29 to 88 years). Fracture type was classified as intertrochanteric (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen classification 31.A.1, A.2 and A.3) and subtrochanteric fractures (Seinsheimer classification). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The ratio between the genders female-male was 1.6:1. There was statistically significant difference prevalence of female compared to male patients (p=0.012). There were 31 left and 32 right hip fractured. Low energy trauma was the cause of fractures in 57(90.5%) patients. Averaged waiting time for hospitalization was 3.2±7.5 days (range, 0 to 32 days). 44 patients were admitted the same day upon injuring. The average waiting time for the treatment was 3.6±5.7 days. The ratio between with or without co-existent disease was 4.7:1. During the three months postoperatively with ASA score 3 and 4 six patients died. There were no significant differences in deaths from ASA score 1 and 2 (p=0.52). Reoperation for the treatment of implant or fracture-related complications was required in three (4.7%) patients (infection, reimplantation and extraction). Three patient developed deep vein thrombosis. Statistically significant difference was found in the deaths in the first three months compared to the next three months (p=0.02). We found statistically significant difference between pre-injury and postoperative mobility score (p=0.0001). CONCLUSION: PFNA is an excellent device for osteosynthesis as it can be easily inserted. Moreover, it provides stable fixation, which allows early full weightbearing mobilization of the patient. AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2014-05-31 2014-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4240330/ /pubmed/25568527 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2014.68.173-177 Text en Copyright: © AVICENA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sadic, Sahmir
Custovic, Svemir
Jasarevic, Mahir
Fazlic, Mirsad
Smajic, Nedim
Hrustic, Asmir
Vujadinovic, Aleksandar
Krupic, Ferid
Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation in Treatment of Fractures of Proximal Femur
title Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation in Treatment of Fractures of Proximal Femur
title_full Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation in Treatment of Fractures of Proximal Femur
title_fullStr Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation in Treatment of Fractures of Proximal Femur
title_full_unstemmed Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation in Treatment of Fractures of Proximal Femur
title_short Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation in Treatment of Fractures of Proximal Femur
title_sort proximal femoral nail antirotation in treatment of fractures of proximal femur
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4240330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25568527
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2014.68.173-177
work_keys_str_mv AT sadicsahmir proximalfemoralnailantirotationintreatmentoffracturesofproximalfemur
AT custovicsvemir proximalfemoralnailantirotationintreatmentoffracturesofproximalfemur
AT jasarevicmahir proximalfemoralnailantirotationintreatmentoffracturesofproximalfemur
AT fazlicmirsad proximalfemoralnailantirotationintreatmentoffracturesofproximalfemur
AT smajicnedim proximalfemoralnailantirotationintreatmentoffracturesofproximalfemur
AT hrusticasmir proximalfemoralnailantirotationintreatmentoffracturesofproximalfemur
AT vujadinovicaleksandar proximalfemoralnailantirotationintreatmentoffracturesofproximalfemur
AT krupicferid proximalfemoralnailantirotationintreatmentoffracturesofproximalfemur