Cargando…

Development and validation of the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT)

BACKGROUND: Existing risk stratification tools have limitations and clinical experience suggests they are not used routinely. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a preoperative risk stratification tool to predict 30-day mortality after non-cardiac surgery in adults by analysis of data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Protopapa, K L, Simpson, J C, Smith, N C E, Moonesinghe, S R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4240514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25388883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9638
_version_ 1782345724450570240
author Protopapa, K L
Simpson, J C
Smith, N C E
Moonesinghe, S R
author_facet Protopapa, K L
Simpson, J C
Smith, N C E
Moonesinghe, S R
author_sort Protopapa, K L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Existing risk stratification tools have limitations and clinical experience suggests they are not used routinely. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a preoperative risk stratification tool to predict 30-day mortality after non-cardiac surgery in adults by analysis of data from the observational National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD) Knowing the Risk study. METHODS: The data set was split into derivation and validation cohorts. Logistic regression was used to construct a model in the derivation cohort to create the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT), which was tested in the validation cohort. RESULTS: Prospective data for 19 097 cases in 326 hospitals were obtained from the NCEPOD study. Following exclusion of 2309, details of 16 788 patients were analysed (derivation cohort 11 219, validation cohort 5569). A model of 45 risk factors was refined on repeated regression analyses to develop a model comprising six variables: American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) grade, urgency of surgery (expedited, urgent, immediate), high-risk surgical specialty (gastrointestinal, thoracic, vascular), surgical severity (from minor to complex major), cancer and age 65 years or over. In the validation cohort, the SORT was well calibrated and demonstrated better discrimination than the ASA-PS and Surgical Risk Scale; areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were 0·91 (95 per cent c.i. 0·88 to 0·94), 0·87 (0·84 to 0·91) and 0·88 (0·84 to 0·92) respectively (P < 0·001). CONCLUSION: The SORT allows rapid and simple data entry of six preoperative variables, and provides a percentage mortality risk for individuals undergoing surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4240514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42405142014-12-22 Development and validation of the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT) Protopapa, K L Simpson, J C Smith, N C E Moonesinghe, S R Br J Surg Original Articles BACKGROUND: Existing risk stratification tools have limitations and clinical experience suggests they are not used routinely. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a preoperative risk stratification tool to predict 30-day mortality after non-cardiac surgery in adults by analysis of data from the observational National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD) Knowing the Risk study. METHODS: The data set was split into derivation and validation cohorts. Logistic regression was used to construct a model in the derivation cohort to create the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT), which was tested in the validation cohort. RESULTS: Prospective data for 19 097 cases in 326 hospitals were obtained from the NCEPOD study. Following exclusion of 2309, details of 16 788 patients were analysed (derivation cohort 11 219, validation cohort 5569). A model of 45 risk factors was refined on repeated regression analyses to develop a model comprising six variables: American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) grade, urgency of surgery (expedited, urgent, immediate), high-risk surgical specialty (gastrointestinal, thoracic, vascular), surgical severity (from minor to complex major), cancer and age 65 years or over. In the validation cohort, the SORT was well calibrated and demonstrated better discrimination than the ASA-PS and Surgical Risk Scale; areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were 0·91 (95 per cent c.i. 0·88 to 0·94), 0·87 (0·84 to 0·91) and 0·88 (0·84 to 0·92) respectively (P < 0·001). CONCLUSION: The SORT allows rapid and simple data entry of six preoperative variables, and provides a percentage mortality risk for individuals undergoing surgery. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2014-12 2014-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4240514/ /pubmed/25388883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9638 Text en © 2014 The Authors. BJS published by JohnWiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Protopapa, K L
Simpson, J C
Smith, N C E
Moonesinghe, S R
Development and validation of the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT)
title Development and validation of the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT)
title_full Development and validation of the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT)
title_fullStr Development and validation of the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT)
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT)
title_short Development and validation of the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT)
title_sort development and validation of the surgical outcome risk tool (sort)
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4240514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25388883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9638
work_keys_str_mv AT protopapakl developmentandvalidationofthesurgicaloutcomerisktoolsort
AT simpsonjc developmentandvalidationofthesurgicaloutcomerisktoolsort
AT smithnce developmentandvalidationofthesurgicaloutcomerisktoolsort
AT moonesinghesr developmentandvalidationofthesurgicaloutcomerisktoolsort