Cargando…
Comparison of Hydroxyethyl Starch 6% and Crystalloids for Preloading in Elective Caesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia
BACKGROUND: Although controversial, many studies have shown effectiveness of colloid loading as a substitute for crystalloids on reducing the incidence of hypotension in spinal anesthesia. This study was conducted to compare the effects of three intravenous fluid regimens on hemodynamic changes foll...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4240562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25568553 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2014.68.279-281 |
_version_ | 1782345732350541824 |
---|---|
author | Alimian, Mahzad Mohseni, Masood Safaeian, Reza Faiz, Seyed Hamid Reza Majedi, Mohammad Azad |
author_facet | Alimian, Mahzad Mohseni, Masood Safaeian, Reza Faiz, Seyed Hamid Reza Majedi, Mohammad Azad |
author_sort | Alimian, Mahzad |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although controversial, many studies have shown effectiveness of colloid loading as a substitute for crystalloids on reducing the incidence of hypotension in spinal anesthesia. This study was conducted to compare the effects of three intravenous fluid regimens on hemodynamic changes following spinal anesthesia in cesarean section. The regimens included 6% Hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4 (HES) as a colloid and two crystalloids (lactated ringer’s solution and sodium chloride 0.9%). MATERIAL & METHOD: In a double-blind clinical trial, 90 otherwise healthy parturients candidate of elective caesarean section were randomly allocated to receive lactated ringer’s solution (1000 ml), sodium chloride 0.9% (1000 ml) or HES (7.5 mL/Kg) as preloading before spinal anesthesia. Hemodynamic parameters including blood pressure and heart rate, umbilical cord blood pH and the neonatal Apgar score were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: There was no difference in the basic hemodynamic measurements among the three groups. The incidence of hypotension and required dose of ephedrine was lower in HES group (p=0.008). There was no significant difference in umbilical cord blood PH or Apgar scores among intervention groups. CONCLUSION: Preloading with HES is more effective than crystalloids in prevention hypotension after spinal anesthesia without significant difference in Apgar score and umblical cord blood pH. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4240562 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42405622015-01-07 Comparison of Hydroxyethyl Starch 6% and Crystalloids for Preloading in Elective Caesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia Alimian, Mahzad Mohseni, Masood Safaeian, Reza Faiz, Seyed Hamid Reza Majedi, Mohammad Azad Med Arch Original Article BACKGROUND: Although controversial, many studies have shown effectiveness of colloid loading as a substitute for crystalloids on reducing the incidence of hypotension in spinal anesthesia. This study was conducted to compare the effects of three intravenous fluid regimens on hemodynamic changes following spinal anesthesia in cesarean section. The regimens included 6% Hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4 (HES) as a colloid and two crystalloids (lactated ringer’s solution and sodium chloride 0.9%). MATERIAL & METHOD: In a double-blind clinical trial, 90 otherwise healthy parturients candidate of elective caesarean section were randomly allocated to receive lactated ringer’s solution (1000 ml), sodium chloride 0.9% (1000 ml) or HES (7.5 mL/Kg) as preloading before spinal anesthesia. Hemodynamic parameters including blood pressure and heart rate, umbilical cord blood pH and the neonatal Apgar score were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: There was no difference in the basic hemodynamic measurements among the three groups. The incidence of hypotension and required dose of ephedrine was lower in HES group (p=0.008). There was no significant difference in umbilical cord blood PH or Apgar scores among intervention groups. CONCLUSION: Preloading with HES is more effective than crystalloids in prevention hypotension after spinal anesthesia without significant difference in Apgar score and umblical cord blood pH. AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2014-08 2014-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4240562/ /pubmed/25568553 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2014.68.279-281 Text en Copyright: © AVICENA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Alimian, Mahzad Mohseni, Masood Safaeian, Reza Faiz, Seyed Hamid Reza Majedi, Mohammad Azad Comparison of Hydroxyethyl Starch 6% and Crystalloids for Preloading in Elective Caesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia |
title | Comparison of Hydroxyethyl Starch 6% and Crystalloids for Preloading in Elective Caesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia |
title_full | Comparison of Hydroxyethyl Starch 6% and Crystalloids for Preloading in Elective Caesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Hydroxyethyl Starch 6% and Crystalloids for Preloading in Elective Caesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Hydroxyethyl Starch 6% and Crystalloids for Preloading in Elective Caesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia |
title_short | Comparison of Hydroxyethyl Starch 6% and Crystalloids for Preloading in Elective Caesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia |
title_sort | comparison of hydroxyethyl starch 6% and crystalloids for preloading in elective caesarean section under spinal anesthesia |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4240562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25568553 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2014.68.279-281 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alimianmahzad comparisonofhydroxyethylstarch6andcrystalloidsforpreloadinginelectivecaesareansectionunderspinalanesthesia AT mohsenimasood comparisonofhydroxyethylstarch6andcrystalloidsforpreloadinginelectivecaesareansectionunderspinalanesthesia AT safaeianreza comparisonofhydroxyethylstarch6andcrystalloidsforpreloadinginelectivecaesareansectionunderspinalanesthesia AT faizseyedhamidreza comparisonofhydroxyethylstarch6andcrystalloidsforpreloadinginelectivecaesareansectionunderspinalanesthesia AT majedimohammadazad comparisonofhydroxyethylstarch6andcrystalloidsforpreloadinginelectivecaesareansectionunderspinalanesthesia |