Cargando…

Comparison of Hydroxyethyl Starch 6% and Crystalloids for Preloading in Elective Caesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia

BACKGROUND: Although controversial, many studies have shown effectiveness of colloid loading as a substitute for crystalloids on reducing the incidence of hypotension in spinal anesthesia. This study was conducted to compare the effects of three intravenous fluid regimens on hemodynamic changes foll...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alimian, Mahzad, Mohseni, Masood, Safaeian, Reza, Faiz, Seyed Hamid Reza, Majedi, Mohammad Azad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4240562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25568553
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2014.68.279-281
_version_ 1782345732350541824
author Alimian, Mahzad
Mohseni, Masood
Safaeian, Reza
Faiz, Seyed Hamid Reza
Majedi, Mohammad Azad
author_facet Alimian, Mahzad
Mohseni, Masood
Safaeian, Reza
Faiz, Seyed Hamid Reza
Majedi, Mohammad Azad
author_sort Alimian, Mahzad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although controversial, many studies have shown effectiveness of colloid loading as a substitute for crystalloids on reducing the incidence of hypotension in spinal anesthesia. This study was conducted to compare the effects of three intravenous fluid regimens on hemodynamic changes following spinal anesthesia in cesarean section. The regimens included 6% Hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4 (HES) as a colloid and two crystalloids (lactated ringer’s solution and sodium chloride 0.9%). MATERIAL & METHOD: In a double-blind clinical trial, 90 otherwise healthy parturients candidate of elective caesarean section were randomly allocated to receive lactated ringer’s solution (1000 ml), sodium chloride 0.9% (1000 ml) or HES (7.5 mL/Kg) as preloading before spinal anesthesia. Hemodynamic parameters including blood pressure and heart rate, umbilical cord blood pH and the neonatal Apgar score were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: There was no difference in the basic hemodynamic measurements among the three groups. The incidence of hypotension and required dose of ephedrine was lower in HES group (p=0.008). There was no significant difference in umbilical cord blood PH or Apgar scores among intervention groups. CONCLUSION: Preloading with HES is more effective than crystalloids in prevention hypotension after spinal anesthesia without significant difference in Apgar score and umblical cord blood pH.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4240562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42405622015-01-07 Comparison of Hydroxyethyl Starch 6% and Crystalloids for Preloading in Elective Caesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia Alimian, Mahzad Mohseni, Masood Safaeian, Reza Faiz, Seyed Hamid Reza Majedi, Mohammad Azad Med Arch Original Article BACKGROUND: Although controversial, many studies have shown effectiveness of colloid loading as a substitute for crystalloids on reducing the incidence of hypotension in spinal anesthesia. This study was conducted to compare the effects of three intravenous fluid regimens on hemodynamic changes following spinal anesthesia in cesarean section. The regimens included 6% Hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4 (HES) as a colloid and two crystalloids (lactated ringer’s solution and sodium chloride 0.9%). MATERIAL & METHOD: In a double-blind clinical trial, 90 otherwise healthy parturients candidate of elective caesarean section were randomly allocated to receive lactated ringer’s solution (1000 ml), sodium chloride 0.9% (1000 ml) or HES (7.5 mL/Kg) as preloading before spinal anesthesia. Hemodynamic parameters including blood pressure and heart rate, umbilical cord blood pH and the neonatal Apgar score were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: There was no difference in the basic hemodynamic measurements among the three groups. The incidence of hypotension and required dose of ephedrine was lower in HES group (p=0.008). There was no significant difference in umbilical cord blood PH or Apgar scores among intervention groups. CONCLUSION: Preloading with HES is more effective than crystalloids in prevention hypotension after spinal anesthesia without significant difference in Apgar score and umblical cord blood pH. AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2014-08 2014-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4240562/ /pubmed/25568553 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2014.68.279-281 Text en Copyright: © AVICENA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Alimian, Mahzad
Mohseni, Masood
Safaeian, Reza
Faiz, Seyed Hamid Reza
Majedi, Mohammad Azad
Comparison of Hydroxyethyl Starch 6% and Crystalloids for Preloading in Elective Caesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia
title Comparison of Hydroxyethyl Starch 6% and Crystalloids for Preloading in Elective Caesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia
title_full Comparison of Hydroxyethyl Starch 6% and Crystalloids for Preloading in Elective Caesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia
title_fullStr Comparison of Hydroxyethyl Starch 6% and Crystalloids for Preloading in Elective Caesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Hydroxyethyl Starch 6% and Crystalloids for Preloading in Elective Caesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia
title_short Comparison of Hydroxyethyl Starch 6% and Crystalloids for Preloading in Elective Caesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia
title_sort comparison of hydroxyethyl starch 6% and crystalloids for preloading in elective caesarean section under spinal anesthesia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4240562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25568553
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2014.68.279-281
work_keys_str_mv AT alimianmahzad comparisonofhydroxyethylstarch6andcrystalloidsforpreloadinginelectivecaesareansectionunderspinalanesthesia
AT mohsenimasood comparisonofhydroxyethylstarch6andcrystalloidsforpreloadinginelectivecaesareansectionunderspinalanesthesia
AT safaeianreza comparisonofhydroxyethylstarch6andcrystalloidsforpreloadinginelectivecaesareansectionunderspinalanesthesia
AT faizseyedhamidreza comparisonofhydroxyethylstarch6andcrystalloidsforpreloadinginelectivecaesareansectionunderspinalanesthesia
AT majedimohammadazad comparisonofhydroxyethylstarch6andcrystalloidsforpreloadinginelectivecaesareansectionunderspinalanesthesia