Cargando…
Species, Habitats, Society: An Evaluation of Research Supporting EU's Natura 2000 Network
The Natura 2000 network is regarded as one of the conservation success stories in the global effort to protect biodiversity. However, significant challenges remain in Natura 2000 implementation, owing to its rapid expansion, and lack of a coherent vision for its future. Scientific research is critic...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4240592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25415188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113648 |
_version_ | 1782345739293163520 |
---|---|
author | Popescu, Viorel D. Rozylowicz, Laurentiu Niculae, Iulian M. Cucu, Adina L. Hartel, Tibor |
author_facet | Popescu, Viorel D. Rozylowicz, Laurentiu Niculae, Iulian M. Cucu, Adina L. Hartel, Tibor |
author_sort | Popescu, Viorel D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Natura 2000 network is regarded as one of the conservation success stories in the global effort to protect biodiversity. However, significant challenges remain in Natura 2000 implementation, owing to its rapid expansion, and lack of a coherent vision for its future. Scientific research is critical for identifying conservation priorities, setting management goals, and reconciling biodiversity protection and society in the complex political European landscape. Thus, there is an urgent need for a comprehensive evaluation of published Natura 2000 research to highlight prevalent research themes, disciplinary approaches, and spatial entities. We conducted a systematic review of 572 scientific articles and conference proceedings focused on Natura 2000 research, published between 1996 and 2014. We grouped these articles into ‘ecological’ and ‘social and policy’ categories. Using a novel application of network analysis of article keywords, we found that Natura 2000 research forms a cohesive small-world network, owing to the emphasis on ecological research (79% of studies, with a strong focus on spatial conservation planning), and the underrepresentation of studies addressing ‘social and policy’ issues (typically focused on environmental impact assessment, multi-level governance, agri-environment policy, and ecosystem services valuation). ‘Ecological’ and ‘social and policy’ research shared only general concepts (e.g., Natura 2000, Habitats Directive) suggesting a disconnection between these disciplines. The UK and the Mediterranean basin countries dominated Natura 2000 research, and there was a weak correlation between number of studies and proportion of national territory protected. Approximately 40% of ‘social and policy’ research and 26% of ‘ecological’ studies highlighted negative implications of Natura 2000, while 21% of studies found positive social and biodiversity effects. We emphasize the need for designing inter- and transdisciplinary research in order to promote a social-ecological understanding of Natura 2000, and advance EU conservation policies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4240592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42405922014-11-26 Species, Habitats, Society: An Evaluation of Research Supporting EU's Natura 2000 Network Popescu, Viorel D. Rozylowicz, Laurentiu Niculae, Iulian M. Cucu, Adina L. Hartel, Tibor PLoS One Research Article The Natura 2000 network is regarded as one of the conservation success stories in the global effort to protect biodiversity. However, significant challenges remain in Natura 2000 implementation, owing to its rapid expansion, and lack of a coherent vision for its future. Scientific research is critical for identifying conservation priorities, setting management goals, and reconciling biodiversity protection and society in the complex political European landscape. Thus, there is an urgent need for a comprehensive evaluation of published Natura 2000 research to highlight prevalent research themes, disciplinary approaches, and spatial entities. We conducted a systematic review of 572 scientific articles and conference proceedings focused on Natura 2000 research, published between 1996 and 2014. We grouped these articles into ‘ecological’ and ‘social and policy’ categories. Using a novel application of network analysis of article keywords, we found that Natura 2000 research forms a cohesive small-world network, owing to the emphasis on ecological research (79% of studies, with a strong focus on spatial conservation planning), and the underrepresentation of studies addressing ‘social and policy’ issues (typically focused on environmental impact assessment, multi-level governance, agri-environment policy, and ecosystem services valuation). ‘Ecological’ and ‘social and policy’ research shared only general concepts (e.g., Natura 2000, Habitats Directive) suggesting a disconnection between these disciplines. The UK and the Mediterranean basin countries dominated Natura 2000 research, and there was a weak correlation between number of studies and proportion of national territory protected. Approximately 40% of ‘social and policy’ research and 26% of ‘ecological’ studies highlighted negative implications of Natura 2000, while 21% of studies found positive social and biodiversity effects. We emphasize the need for designing inter- and transdisciplinary research in order to promote a social-ecological understanding of Natura 2000, and advance EU conservation policies. Public Library of Science 2014-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4240592/ /pubmed/25415188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113648 Text en © 2014 Popescu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Popescu, Viorel D. Rozylowicz, Laurentiu Niculae, Iulian M. Cucu, Adina L. Hartel, Tibor Species, Habitats, Society: An Evaluation of Research Supporting EU's Natura 2000 Network |
title | Species, Habitats, Society: An Evaluation of Research Supporting EU's Natura 2000 Network |
title_full | Species, Habitats, Society: An Evaluation of Research Supporting EU's Natura 2000 Network |
title_fullStr | Species, Habitats, Society: An Evaluation of Research Supporting EU's Natura 2000 Network |
title_full_unstemmed | Species, Habitats, Society: An Evaluation of Research Supporting EU's Natura 2000 Network |
title_short | Species, Habitats, Society: An Evaluation of Research Supporting EU's Natura 2000 Network |
title_sort | species, habitats, society: an evaluation of research supporting eu's natura 2000 network |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4240592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25415188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113648 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT popescuvioreld specieshabitatssocietyanevaluationofresearchsupportingeusnatura2000network AT rozylowiczlaurentiu specieshabitatssocietyanevaluationofresearchsupportingeusnatura2000network AT niculaeiulianm specieshabitatssocietyanevaluationofresearchsupportingeusnatura2000network AT cucuadinal specieshabitatssocietyanevaluationofresearchsupportingeusnatura2000network AT harteltibor specieshabitatssocietyanevaluationofresearchsupportingeusnatura2000network |