Cargando…

Analysis of pain level in cases treated with Invisalign aligner: comparison with fixed edgewise appliance therapy

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the difference in the level of pain using the visual analog scale (VAS) between cases treated with the edgewise appliance and Invisalign. In addition, the cause of pain and discomfort in the Invisalign cases was identified. METHODS: The s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fujiyama, Koji, Honjo, Tadashi, Suzuki, Makoto, Matsuoka, Shinya, Deguchi, Toru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4240829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25416143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-014-0064-7
_version_ 1782345777957306368
author Fujiyama, Koji
Honjo, Tadashi
Suzuki, Makoto
Matsuoka, Shinya
Deguchi, Toru
author_facet Fujiyama, Koji
Honjo, Tadashi
Suzuki, Makoto
Matsuoka, Shinya
Deguchi, Toru
author_sort Fujiyama, Koji
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the difference in the level of pain using the visual analog scale (VAS) between cases treated with the edgewise appliance and Invisalign. In addition, the cause of pain and discomfort in the Invisalign cases was identified. METHODS: The sample consisted of 145 cases for the edgewise group (EG; n = 55), Invisalign group (IG; n = 38), and edgewise and Invisalign group (EIG; n = 52). VAS scores were collected during the first three stages (first stage: 0 to 7 days, second stage: 14 to 21 days, and third stage: 28 to 35 days) and at the end of the treatment (overall VAS score). Evaluation of the cause of pain was categorized into three different types of problem (category 1: non-smoothed marginal ridge or missing materials, category 2: deformation of attachments, and Category 3: deformation of the tray). Statistical comparison of VAS scores between groups was performed by two-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: A significantly higher VAS score was observed at 3 and 4 days after, at 1, 2, and 3 days after, and at 2 and 3 days after in stages 1, 2, and 3, respectively, in EG compared to EIG and IG. A significant difference was observed in overall VAS scores between EG and IG in intensity of pain, number of days that pain lasted, and discomfort level. Only intensity of pain resulted in a significant difference between EG and EIG. Most of the causes of problem in the Invisalign cases were deformation of the tray. CONCLUSIONS: Invisalign may offer less pain compared to the edgewise appliance during the initial stages of treatment. In the use of Invisalign, deformation of tray must be carefully checked to avoid pain and discomfort for the patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4240829
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42408292014-11-23 Analysis of pain level in cases treated with Invisalign aligner: comparison with fixed edgewise appliance therapy Fujiyama, Koji Honjo, Tadashi Suzuki, Makoto Matsuoka, Shinya Deguchi, Toru Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the difference in the level of pain using the visual analog scale (VAS) between cases treated with the edgewise appliance and Invisalign. In addition, the cause of pain and discomfort in the Invisalign cases was identified. METHODS: The sample consisted of 145 cases for the edgewise group (EG; n = 55), Invisalign group (IG; n = 38), and edgewise and Invisalign group (EIG; n = 52). VAS scores were collected during the first three stages (first stage: 0 to 7 days, second stage: 14 to 21 days, and third stage: 28 to 35 days) and at the end of the treatment (overall VAS score). Evaluation of the cause of pain was categorized into three different types of problem (category 1: non-smoothed marginal ridge or missing materials, category 2: deformation of attachments, and Category 3: deformation of the tray). Statistical comparison of VAS scores between groups was performed by two-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: A significantly higher VAS score was observed at 3 and 4 days after, at 1, 2, and 3 days after, and at 2 and 3 days after in stages 1, 2, and 3, respectively, in EG compared to EIG and IG. A significant difference was observed in overall VAS scores between EG and IG in intensity of pain, number of days that pain lasted, and discomfort level. Only intensity of pain resulted in a significant difference between EG and EIG. Most of the causes of problem in the Invisalign cases were deformation of the tray. CONCLUSIONS: Invisalign may offer less pain compared to the edgewise appliance during the initial stages of treatment. In the use of Invisalign, deformation of tray must be carefully checked to avoid pain and discomfort for the patients. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4240829/ /pubmed/25416143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-014-0064-7 Text en © Fujiyama et al.; licensee Springer. 2014 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research
Fujiyama, Koji
Honjo, Tadashi
Suzuki, Makoto
Matsuoka, Shinya
Deguchi, Toru
Analysis of pain level in cases treated with Invisalign aligner: comparison with fixed edgewise appliance therapy
title Analysis of pain level in cases treated with Invisalign aligner: comparison with fixed edgewise appliance therapy
title_full Analysis of pain level in cases treated with Invisalign aligner: comparison with fixed edgewise appliance therapy
title_fullStr Analysis of pain level in cases treated with Invisalign aligner: comparison with fixed edgewise appliance therapy
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of pain level in cases treated with Invisalign aligner: comparison with fixed edgewise appliance therapy
title_short Analysis of pain level in cases treated with Invisalign aligner: comparison with fixed edgewise appliance therapy
title_sort analysis of pain level in cases treated with invisalign aligner: comparison with fixed edgewise appliance therapy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4240829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25416143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-014-0064-7
work_keys_str_mv AT fujiyamakoji analysisofpainlevelincasestreatedwithinvisalignalignercomparisonwithfixededgewiseappliancetherapy
AT honjotadashi analysisofpainlevelincasestreatedwithinvisalignalignercomparisonwithfixededgewiseappliancetherapy
AT suzukimakoto analysisofpainlevelincasestreatedwithinvisalignalignercomparisonwithfixededgewiseappliancetherapy
AT matsuokashinya analysisofpainlevelincasestreatedwithinvisalignalignercomparisonwithfixededgewiseappliancetherapy
AT deguchitoru analysisofpainlevelincasestreatedwithinvisalignalignercomparisonwithfixededgewiseappliancetherapy