Cargando…

Clinical application of the paraspinal erector approach for spinal canal decompression in upper lumber burst fractures

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is commonly used for upper lumber burst fractures. The direct decompression remains challenging with this minimally invasive surgery. The objective was to evaluate a novel paraspinal erector approach for effective and direct decompression in patients wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Xi-Yan, Yan, Zheng-Jian, Ma, Qing, Chen, Liang, Ke, Zhen-Yong, Chen, Fu, Chen, Yun, Chu, Lei, Deng, Zhong-Liang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4240844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25387608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-014-0105-4
_version_ 1782345781442772992
author Xu, Xi-Yan
Yan, Zheng-Jian
Ma, Qing
Chen, Liang
Ke, Zhen-Yong
Chen, Fu
Chen, Yun
Chu, Lei
Deng, Zhong-Liang
author_facet Xu, Xi-Yan
Yan, Zheng-Jian
Ma, Qing
Chen, Liang
Ke, Zhen-Yong
Chen, Fu
Chen, Yun
Chu, Lei
Deng, Zhong-Liang
author_sort Xu, Xi-Yan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is commonly used for upper lumber burst fractures. The direct decompression remains challenging with this minimally invasive surgery. The objective was to evaluate a novel paraspinal erector approach for effective and direct decompression in patients with canal compromise and neurologic deficit. METHOD: Patients (n = 21) with neurological deficiency and Denis B type upper lumbar burst fracture were enrolled in the study, including 14 cases in the L1 and 7 cases in the L2. The patients underwent removal of bone fragments from the spinal canal through intervertebral foramen followed by short-segment fixation. Evaluations included surgery-related, such as duration of surgery and blood loss, and 12-month follow-up, such as the kyphotic angle, the height ratio of the anterior edge of the vertebra, the ratio of sagittal canal compromise, visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Frankel scores. RESULTS: All patients achieved direct spinal canal decompression using the paraspinal erector approach followed by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. The mean operation time (SD) was 173 (23) min, and the mean (SD) blood loss was 301 (104) ml. Significant improvement was noted in the kyphotic angle, 26.2 ± 8.7 prior to operation versus 9.1 ± 4.7 at 12 months after operation (p <0.05); the height ratio of the anterior edge of the injured vertebra, 60 ± 16% versus 84 ± 9% (p <0.05); and the ratio of sagittal canal compromise, 46.5 ± 11.4% versus 4.3 ± 3.6% (p <0.05). Significant improvements in VAS (7.3 ± 1.2 vs. 1.9 ± 0.7, p <0.05), ODI (86.7 ± 5.8 vs. 16.7 ± 5.1, p <0.05), and Frankel scores were also noted. CONCLUSIONS: The paraspinal erector approach was effective for direct spinal canal decompression with minimal injury in the paraspinal muscles or spine. Significant improvements in spinal function and prognostics were achieved after the percutaneous pedicle screw fixation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4240844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42408442014-11-23 Clinical application of the paraspinal erector approach for spinal canal decompression in upper lumber burst fractures Xu, Xi-Yan Yan, Zheng-Jian Ma, Qing Chen, Liang Ke, Zhen-Yong Chen, Fu Chen, Yun Chu, Lei Deng, Zhong-Liang J Orthop Surg Res Research Article OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is commonly used for upper lumber burst fractures. The direct decompression remains challenging with this minimally invasive surgery. The objective was to evaluate a novel paraspinal erector approach for effective and direct decompression in patients with canal compromise and neurologic deficit. METHOD: Patients (n = 21) with neurological deficiency and Denis B type upper lumbar burst fracture were enrolled in the study, including 14 cases in the L1 and 7 cases in the L2. The patients underwent removal of bone fragments from the spinal canal through intervertebral foramen followed by short-segment fixation. Evaluations included surgery-related, such as duration of surgery and blood loss, and 12-month follow-up, such as the kyphotic angle, the height ratio of the anterior edge of the vertebra, the ratio of sagittal canal compromise, visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Frankel scores. RESULTS: All patients achieved direct spinal canal decompression using the paraspinal erector approach followed by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. The mean operation time (SD) was 173 (23) min, and the mean (SD) blood loss was 301 (104) ml. Significant improvement was noted in the kyphotic angle, 26.2 ± 8.7 prior to operation versus 9.1 ± 4.7 at 12 months after operation (p <0.05); the height ratio of the anterior edge of the injured vertebra, 60 ± 16% versus 84 ± 9% (p <0.05); and the ratio of sagittal canal compromise, 46.5 ± 11.4% versus 4.3 ± 3.6% (p <0.05). Significant improvements in VAS (7.3 ± 1.2 vs. 1.9 ± 0.7, p <0.05), ODI (86.7 ± 5.8 vs. 16.7 ± 5.1, p <0.05), and Frankel scores were also noted. CONCLUSIONS: The paraspinal erector approach was effective for direct spinal canal decompression with minimal injury in the paraspinal muscles or spine. Significant improvements in spinal function and prognostics were achieved after the percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. BioMed Central 2014-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4240844/ /pubmed/25387608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-014-0105-4 Text en © Xu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xu, Xi-Yan
Yan, Zheng-Jian
Ma, Qing
Chen, Liang
Ke, Zhen-Yong
Chen, Fu
Chen, Yun
Chu, Lei
Deng, Zhong-Liang
Clinical application of the paraspinal erector approach for spinal canal decompression in upper lumber burst fractures
title Clinical application of the paraspinal erector approach for spinal canal decompression in upper lumber burst fractures
title_full Clinical application of the paraspinal erector approach for spinal canal decompression in upper lumber burst fractures
title_fullStr Clinical application of the paraspinal erector approach for spinal canal decompression in upper lumber burst fractures
title_full_unstemmed Clinical application of the paraspinal erector approach for spinal canal decompression in upper lumber burst fractures
title_short Clinical application of the paraspinal erector approach for spinal canal decompression in upper lumber burst fractures
title_sort clinical application of the paraspinal erector approach for spinal canal decompression in upper lumber burst fractures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4240844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25387608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-014-0105-4
work_keys_str_mv AT xuxiyan clinicalapplicationoftheparaspinalerectorapproachforspinalcanaldecompressioninupperlumberburstfractures
AT yanzhengjian clinicalapplicationoftheparaspinalerectorapproachforspinalcanaldecompressioninupperlumberburstfractures
AT maqing clinicalapplicationoftheparaspinalerectorapproachforspinalcanaldecompressioninupperlumberburstfractures
AT chenliang clinicalapplicationoftheparaspinalerectorapproachforspinalcanaldecompressioninupperlumberburstfractures
AT kezhenyong clinicalapplicationoftheparaspinalerectorapproachforspinalcanaldecompressioninupperlumberburstfractures
AT chenfu clinicalapplicationoftheparaspinalerectorapproachforspinalcanaldecompressioninupperlumberburstfractures
AT chenyun clinicalapplicationoftheparaspinalerectorapproachforspinalcanaldecompressioninupperlumberburstfractures
AT chulei clinicalapplicationoftheparaspinalerectorapproachforspinalcanaldecompressioninupperlumberburstfractures
AT dengzhongliang clinicalapplicationoftheparaspinalerectorapproachforspinalcanaldecompressioninupperlumberburstfractures