Cargando…

Screening for periodontal disease in research dogs - a methodology study

BACKGROUND: It has been shown that the prevalence of both clinical attachment loss (CAL) ≥1 mm and pocket probing depth (PPD) ≥4 mm is relatively high even in younger dogs, but also that only a minority of the dogs have such clinical signs of periodontal disease (PD) in more than a few teeth. Hence,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kortegaard, Hanne E, Eriksen, Thomas, Baelum, Vibeke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4240878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25407813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-014-0077-8
_version_ 1782345789276684288
author Kortegaard, Hanne E
Eriksen, Thomas
Baelum, Vibeke
author_facet Kortegaard, Hanne E
Eriksen, Thomas
Baelum, Vibeke
author_sort Kortegaard, Hanne E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It has been shown that the prevalence of both clinical attachment loss (CAL) ≥1 mm and pocket probing depth (PPD) ≥4 mm is relatively high even in younger dogs, but also that only a minority of the dogs have such clinical signs of periodontal disease (PD) in more than a few teeth. Hence, a minority of dogs carry the major PD burden. These epidemiological features suggest that screening for PD in larger groups of dogs, allowing for rapid assessment of treatment planning, or for the selection of dogs with or without PD prior to be included in experimental trials, should be possible. CAL is the central variable in assessing PD extent and severity while PPD is the central variable used in treatment planning which make these two variables obvious in a screening protocol with the dual aim of disease identification and treatment planning. The main purpose of the present study in 98 laboratory Beagle dogs was to construct a fast, simple and accurate screening tool, which is highly sensitive for the identification of dogs with PD. RESULTS: Examination of the maxillary P4, P3, P2, I1 and C would, in this population, result in the identification of 85.5% of all dogs and 96% of all teeth positive for CAL ≥1 mm, and 58.9% of all dogs and 82.1% of all teeth positive for PD ≥4 mm. Examination of tooth pairs, all C’s, maxillary I2, M2 and the mandibular P4 would, in this population result in identification of 92.9% of all dogs and 97.3% of all teeth positive for PD ≥4 mm, and 65.5% of all dogs and 83.2% of all teeth positive for CAL ≥1 mm. The results presented here only pertain to the present study population. CONCLUSIONS: This screening protocol is suitable for examination of larger groups of laboratory Beagle dogs for PD and our findings indicate that diseased dogs are identified with a high degree of sensitivity. Before this screening can be used in clinical practice, it has to be validated in breeds other than Beagle dogs and in populations with larger age variation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4240878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42408782014-11-23 Screening for periodontal disease in research dogs - a methodology study Kortegaard, Hanne E Eriksen, Thomas Baelum, Vibeke Acta Vet Scand Research BACKGROUND: It has been shown that the prevalence of both clinical attachment loss (CAL) ≥1 mm and pocket probing depth (PPD) ≥4 mm is relatively high even in younger dogs, but also that only a minority of the dogs have such clinical signs of periodontal disease (PD) in more than a few teeth. Hence, a minority of dogs carry the major PD burden. These epidemiological features suggest that screening for PD in larger groups of dogs, allowing for rapid assessment of treatment planning, or for the selection of dogs with or without PD prior to be included in experimental trials, should be possible. CAL is the central variable in assessing PD extent and severity while PPD is the central variable used in treatment planning which make these two variables obvious in a screening protocol with the dual aim of disease identification and treatment planning. The main purpose of the present study in 98 laboratory Beagle dogs was to construct a fast, simple and accurate screening tool, which is highly sensitive for the identification of dogs with PD. RESULTS: Examination of the maxillary P4, P3, P2, I1 and C would, in this population, result in the identification of 85.5% of all dogs and 96% of all teeth positive for CAL ≥1 mm, and 58.9% of all dogs and 82.1% of all teeth positive for PD ≥4 mm. Examination of tooth pairs, all C’s, maxillary I2, M2 and the mandibular P4 would, in this population result in identification of 92.9% of all dogs and 97.3% of all teeth positive for PD ≥4 mm, and 65.5% of all dogs and 83.2% of all teeth positive for CAL ≥1 mm. The results presented here only pertain to the present study population. CONCLUSIONS: This screening protocol is suitable for examination of larger groups of laboratory Beagle dogs for PD and our findings indicate that diseased dogs are identified with a high degree of sensitivity. Before this screening can be used in clinical practice, it has to be validated in breeds other than Beagle dogs and in populations with larger age variation. BioMed Central 2014-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4240878/ /pubmed/25407813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-014-0077-8 Text en © Kortegaard et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kortegaard, Hanne E
Eriksen, Thomas
Baelum, Vibeke
Screening for periodontal disease in research dogs - a methodology study
title Screening for periodontal disease in research dogs - a methodology study
title_full Screening for periodontal disease in research dogs - a methodology study
title_fullStr Screening for periodontal disease in research dogs - a methodology study
title_full_unstemmed Screening for periodontal disease in research dogs - a methodology study
title_short Screening for periodontal disease in research dogs - a methodology study
title_sort screening for periodontal disease in research dogs - a methodology study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4240878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25407813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-014-0077-8
work_keys_str_mv AT kortegaardhannee screeningforperiodontaldiseaseinresearchdogsamethodologystudy
AT eriksenthomas screeningforperiodontaldiseaseinresearchdogsamethodologystudy
AT baelumvibeke screeningforperiodontaldiseaseinresearchdogsamethodologystudy