Cargando…
Geoengineering, climate change scepticism and the ‘moral hazard’ argument: an experimental study of UK public perceptions
Many commentators have expressed concerns that researching and/or developing geoengineering technologies may undermine support for existing climate policies—the so-called moral hazard argument. This argument plays a central role in policy debates about geoengineering. However, there has not yet been...
Autores principales: | Corner, Adam, Pidgeon, Nick |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society Publishing
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4240956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25404680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0063 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Moral scepticism and moral knowledge
por: Bambrough, Renford
Publicado: (1979) -
From scientific arguments to scepticism: Humans’ place in the Greenhouse
por: Augé, Anaïs
Publicado: (2021) -
Dismissing the Moral Sceptic: A Wittgensteinian Approach
por: Lawson-Frost, Sasha
Publicado: (2017) -
Geoengineering as Collective Experimentation
por: Stilgoe, Jack
Publicado: (2015) -
Crafting a public for geoengineering
por: Bellamy, Rob, et al.
Publicado: (2015)