Cargando…

Running with the Red Queen: the role of biotic conflicts in evolution

What are the causes of natural selection? Over 40 years ago, Van Valen proposed the Red Queen hypothesis, which emphasized the primacy of biotic conflict over abiotic forces in driving selection. Species must continually evolve to survive in the face of their evolving enemies, yet on average their f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brockhurst, Michael A., Chapman, Tracey, King, Kayla C., Mank, Judith E., Paterson, Steve, Hurst, Gregory D. D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4240979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25355473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1382
_version_ 1782345806203846656
author Brockhurst, Michael A.
Chapman, Tracey
King, Kayla C.
Mank, Judith E.
Paterson, Steve
Hurst, Gregory D. D.
author_facet Brockhurst, Michael A.
Chapman, Tracey
King, Kayla C.
Mank, Judith E.
Paterson, Steve
Hurst, Gregory D. D.
author_sort Brockhurst, Michael A.
collection PubMed
description What are the causes of natural selection? Over 40 years ago, Van Valen proposed the Red Queen hypothesis, which emphasized the primacy of biotic conflict over abiotic forces in driving selection. Species must continually evolve to survive in the face of their evolving enemies, yet on average their fitness remains unchanged. We define three modes of Red Queen coevolution to unify both fluctuating and directional selection within the Red Queen framework. Empirical evidence from natural interspecific antagonisms provides support for each of these modes of coevolution and suggests that they often operate simultaneously. We argue that understanding the evolutionary forces associated with interspecific interactions requires incorporation of a community framework, in which new interactions occur frequently. During their early phases, these newly established interactions are likely to drive fast evolution of both parties. We further argue that a more complete synthesis of Red Queen forces requires incorporation of the evolutionary conflicts within species that arise from sexual reproduction. Reciprocally, taking the Red Queen's perspective advances our understanding of the evolution of these intraspecific conflicts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4240979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42409792014-12-22 Running with the Red Queen: the role of biotic conflicts in evolution Brockhurst, Michael A. Chapman, Tracey King, Kayla C. Mank, Judith E. Paterson, Steve Hurst, Gregory D. D. Proc Biol Sci Review Articles What are the causes of natural selection? Over 40 years ago, Van Valen proposed the Red Queen hypothesis, which emphasized the primacy of biotic conflict over abiotic forces in driving selection. Species must continually evolve to survive in the face of their evolving enemies, yet on average their fitness remains unchanged. We define three modes of Red Queen coevolution to unify both fluctuating and directional selection within the Red Queen framework. Empirical evidence from natural interspecific antagonisms provides support for each of these modes of coevolution and suggests that they often operate simultaneously. We argue that understanding the evolutionary forces associated with interspecific interactions requires incorporation of a community framework, in which new interactions occur frequently. During their early phases, these newly established interactions are likely to drive fast evolution of both parties. We further argue that a more complete synthesis of Red Queen forces requires incorporation of the evolutionary conflicts within species that arise from sexual reproduction. Reciprocally, taking the Red Queen's perspective advances our understanding of the evolution of these intraspecific conflicts. The Royal Society 2014-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4240979/ /pubmed/25355473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1382 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ © 2014 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Brockhurst, Michael A.
Chapman, Tracey
King, Kayla C.
Mank, Judith E.
Paterson, Steve
Hurst, Gregory D. D.
Running with the Red Queen: the role of biotic conflicts in evolution
title Running with the Red Queen: the role of biotic conflicts in evolution
title_full Running with the Red Queen: the role of biotic conflicts in evolution
title_fullStr Running with the Red Queen: the role of biotic conflicts in evolution
title_full_unstemmed Running with the Red Queen: the role of biotic conflicts in evolution
title_short Running with the Red Queen: the role of biotic conflicts in evolution
title_sort running with the red queen: the role of biotic conflicts in evolution
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4240979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25355473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1382
work_keys_str_mv AT brockhurstmichaela runningwiththeredqueentheroleofbioticconflictsinevolution
AT chapmantracey runningwiththeredqueentheroleofbioticconflictsinevolution
AT kingkaylac runningwiththeredqueentheroleofbioticconflictsinevolution
AT mankjudithe runningwiththeredqueentheroleofbioticconflictsinevolution
AT patersonsteve runningwiththeredqueentheroleofbioticconflictsinevolution
AT hurstgregorydd runningwiththeredqueentheroleofbioticconflictsinevolution