Cargando…
Safety limitations of MR‐HIFU treatment near interfaces: a phantom validation
Magnetic resonance‐guided high‐intensity focused ultrasound (MR‐HIFU) is a noninvasive image‐guided technique used to thermally ablate solid tumors. During treatment, ultrasound reflections from distal media interfaces can shift prescribed treatment locations. The purpose of this study was to invest...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4241267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22402391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i2.3739 |
_version_ | 1782345827962847232 |
---|---|
author | Hipp, Elizabeth Partanen, Ari Karczmar, Gregory S. Fan, Xiaobing |
author_facet | Hipp, Elizabeth Partanen, Ari Karczmar, Gregory S. Fan, Xiaobing |
author_sort | Hipp, Elizabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | Magnetic resonance‐guided high‐intensity focused ultrasound (MR‐HIFU) is a noninvasive image‐guided technique used to thermally ablate solid tumors. During treatment, ultrasound reflections from distal media interfaces can shift prescribed treatment locations. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of normal incidence reflections from air, acrylic (modeling bone), and rubber on treatment location, temperature elevation, and heating patterns by performing ultrasound exposures in a tissue‐mimicking phantom and in ex vivo porcine tissue using a clinical MR‐HIFU platform. The results demonstrated a shift in treatment location toward the distal interface when targeted closer than 2 cm from the interface, especially for acrylic. Our study demonstrated that the ultrasound wave reflections from a distal air interface had less effect than the acrylic interface (modeling bone) on the heating pattern and focal location. This study provides useful information to better understand the limitations and safety concerns of performing MR‐HIFU treatments with commercial clinical equipment. PACS numbers: 87.61.‐c, 87.63.D |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4241267 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42412672018-04-02 Safety limitations of MR‐HIFU treatment near interfaces: a phantom validation Hipp, Elizabeth Partanen, Ari Karczmar, Gregory S. Fan, Xiaobing J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes Magnetic resonance‐guided high‐intensity focused ultrasound (MR‐HIFU) is a noninvasive image‐guided technique used to thermally ablate solid tumors. During treatment, ultrasound reflections from distal media interfaces can shift prescribed treatment locations. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of normal incidence reflections from air, acrylic (modeling bone), and rubber on treatment location, temperature elevation, and heating patterns by performing ultrasound exposures in a tissue‐mimicking phantom and in ex vivo porcine tissue using a clinical MR‐HIFU platform. The results demonstrated a shift in treatment location toward the distal interface when targeted closer than 2 cm from the interface, especially for acrylic. Our study demonstrated that the ultrasound wave reflections from a distal air interface had less effect than the acrylic interface (modeling bone) on the heating pattern and focal location. This study provides useful information to better understand the limitations and safety concerns of performing MR‐HIFU treatments with commercial clinical equipment. PACS numbers: 87.61.‐c, 87.63.D John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2012-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4241267/ /pubmed/22402391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i2.3739 Text en © 2012 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technical Notes Hipp, Elizabeth Partanen, Ari Karczmar, Gregory S. Fan, Xiaobing Safety limitations of MR‐HIFU treatment near interfaces: a phantom validation |
title | Safety limitations of MR‐HIFU treatment near interfaces: a phantom validation |
title_full | Safety limitations of MR‐HIFU treatment near interfaces: a phantom validation |
title_fullStr | Safety limitations of MR‐HIFU treatment near interfaces: a phantom validation |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety limitations of MR‐HIFU treatment near interfaces: a phantom validation |
title_short | Safety limitations of MR‐HIFU treatment near interfaces: a phantom validation |
title_sort | safety limitations of mr‐hifu treatment near interfaces: a phantom validation |
topic | Technical Notes |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4241267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22402391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i2.3739 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hippelizabeth safetylimitationsofmrhifutreatmentnearinterfacesaphantomvalidation AT partanenari safetylimitationsofmrhifutreatmentnearinterfacesaphantomvalidation AT karczmargregorys safetylimitationsofmrhifutreatmentnearinterfacesaphantomvalidation AT fanxiaobing safetylimitationsofmrhifutreatmentnearinterfacesaphantomvalidation |