Cargando…

Safety limitations of MR‐HIFU treatment near interfaces: a phantom validation

Magnetic resonance‐guided high‐intensity focused ultrasound (MR‐HIFU) is a noninvasive image‐guided technique used to thermally ablate solid tumors. During treatment, ultrasound reflections from distal media interfaces can shift prescribed treatment locations. The purpose of this study was to invest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hipp, Elizabeth, Partanen, Ari, Karczmar, Gregory S., Fan, Xiaobing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4241267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22402391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i2.3739
_version_ 1782345827962847232
author Hipp, Elizabeth
Partanen, Ari
Karczmar, Gregory S.
Fan, Xiaobing
author_facet Hipp, Elizabeth
Partanen, Ari
Karczmar, Gregory S.
Fan, Xiaobing
author_sort Hipp, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description Magnetic resonance‐guided high‐intensity focused ultrasound (MR‐HIFU) is a noninvasive image‐guided technique used to thermally ablate solid tumors. During treatment, ultrasound reflections from distal media interfaces can shift prescribed treatment locations. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of normal incidence reflections from air, acrylic (modeling bone), and rubber on treatment location, temperature elevation, and heating patterns by performing ultrasound exposures in a tissue‐mimicking phantom and in ex vivo porcine tissue using a clinical MR‐HIFU platform. The results demonstrated a shift in treatment location toward the distal interface when targeted closer than 2 cm from the interface, especially for acrylic. Our study demonstrated that the ultrasound wave reflections from a distal air interface had less effect than the acrylic interface (modeling bone) on the heating pattern and focal location. This study provides useful information to better understand the limitations and safety concerns of performing MR‐HIFU treatments with commercial clinical equipment. PACS numbers: 87.61.‐c, 87.63.D
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4241267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42412672018-04-02 Safety limitations of MR‐HIFU treatment near interfaces: a phantom validation Hipp, Elizabeth Partanen, Ari Karczmar, Gregory S. Fan, Xiaobing J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes Magnetic resonance‐guided high‐intensity focused ultrasound (MR‐HIFU) is a noninvasive image‐guided technique used to thermally ablate solid tumors. During treatment, ultrasound reflections from distal media interfaces can shift prescribed treatment locations. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of normal incidence reflections from air, acrylic (modeling bone), and rubber on treatment location, temperature elevation, and heating patterns by performing ultrasound exposures in a tissue‐mimicking phantom and in ex vivo porcine tissue using a clinical MR‐HIFU platform. The results demonstrated a shift in treatment location toward the distal interface when targeted closer than 2 cm from the interface, especially for acrylic. Our study demonstrated that the ultrasound wave reflections from a distal air interface had less effect than the acrylic interface (modeling bone) on the heating pattern and focal location. This study provides useful information to better understand the limitations and safety concerns of performing MR‐HIFU treatments with commercial clinical equipment. PACS numbers: 87.61.‐c, 87.63.D John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2012-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4241267/ /pubmed/22402391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i2.3739 Text en © 2012 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Hipp, Elizabeth
Partanen, Ari
Karczmar, Gregory S.
Fan, Xiaobing
Safety limitations of MR‐HIFU treatment near interfaces: a phantom validation
title Safety limitations of MR‐HIFU treatment near interfaces: a phantom validation
title_full Safety limitations of MR‐HIFU treatment near interfaces: a phantom validation
title_fullStr Safety limitations of MR‐HIFU treatment near interfaces: a phantom validation
title_full_unstemmed Safety limitations of MR‐HIFU treatment near interfaces: a phantom validation
title_short Safety limitations of MR‐HIFU treatment near interfaces: a phantom validation
title_sort safety limitations of mr‐hifu treatment near interfaces: a phantom validation
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4241267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22402391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i2.3739
work_keys_str_mv AT hippelizabeth safetylimitationsofmrhifutreatmentnearinterfacesaphantomvalidation
AT partanenari safetylimitationsofmrhifutreatmentnearinterfacesaphantomvalidation
AT karczmargregorys safetylimitationsofmrhifutreatmentnearinterfacesaphantomvalidation
AT fanxiaobing safetylimitationsofmrhifutreatmentnearinterfacesaphantomvalidation