Cargando…

Paraplegia after intercostal neurolysis with phenol

In patients with advanced stages of cancer, severe pain is commonly encountered and is very difficult to treat. It affects the quality of life of the patient and the families involved. Pain can be managed using analgesics and adjuvant therapy. However, studies have shown that at least 10%–15% of pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gollapalli, Lakshman, Muppuri, Rudramanaidu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4242500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25429238
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S63570
_version_ 1782345956892606464
author Gollapalli, Lakshman
Muppuri, Rudramanaidu
author_facet Gollapalli, Lakshman
Muppuri, Rudramanaidu
author_sort Gollapalli, Lakshman
collection PubMed
description In patients with advanced stages of cancer, severe pain is commonly encountered and is very difficult to treat. It affects the quality of life of the patient and the families involved. Pain can be managed using analgesics and adjuvant therapy. However, studies have shown that at least 10%–15% of patients fail to control pain adequately and will experience severe pain. We discuss the case of a 66-year-old female with metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma of the left submandibular gland and developed paraplegia following intercostal neurolysis with phenol. After a successful diagnostic T6 to T12 intercostal nerve block, the patient was scheduled for an intercostal neurolytic block. We injected 2 mL of 10% aqueous phenol at each level on the left from the T6 to T12 ribs. One hour after the procedure, the patient developed bilateral lower extremity weakness with difficulty moving. A physical examination showed the absence of sensation to pinpricks and vibration from T10 to S5 and an absence of anal sphincter tone and sensation. Magnetic resonance images of the thoracic and lumbar spine showed leptomeningeal metastatic disease and myelitis. We postulate that the paraplegia could be from phenol diffusing along either the spinal nerves or the paravertebral venous plexus into the subarachnoid space. This case report points to the risks involved with phenol neurolysis close to the spine, and we propose alternative methods to minimize neurological complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4242500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42425002014-11-26 Paraplegia after intercostal neurolysis with phenol Gollapalli, Lakshman Muppuri, Rudramanaidu J Pain Res Case Report In patients with advanced stages of cancer, severe pain is commonly encountered and is very difficult to treat. It affects the quality of life of the patient and the families involved. Pain can be managed using analgesics and adjuvant therapy. However, studies have shown that at least 10%–15% of patients fail to control pain adequately and will experience severe pain. We discuss the case of a 66-year-old female with metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma of the left submandibular gland and developed paraplegia following intercostal neurolysis with phenol. After a successful diagnostic T6 to T12 intercostal nerve block, the patient was scheduled for an intercostal neurolytic block. We injected 2 mL of 10% aqueous phenol at each level on the left from the T6 to T12 ribs. One hour after the procedure, the patient developed bilateral lower extremity weakness with difficulty moving. A physical examination showed the absence of sensation to pinpricks and vibration from T10 to S5 and an absence of anal sphincter tone and sensation. Magnetic resonance images of the thoracic and lumbar spine showed leptomeningeal metastatic disease and myelitis. We postulate that the paraplegia could be from phenol diffusing along either the spinal nerves or the paravertebral venous plexus into the subarachnoid space. This case report points to the risks involved with phenol neurolysis close to the spine, and we propose alternative methods to minimize neurological complications. Dove Medical Press 2014-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4242500/ /pubmed/25429238 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S63570 Text en © 2014 Gollapalli and Muppuri. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Case Report
Gollapalli, Lakshman
Muppuri, Rudramanaidu
Paraplegia after intercostal neurolysis with phenol
title Paraplegia after intercostal neurolysis with phenol
title_full Paraplegia after intercostal neurolysis with phenol
title_fullStr Paraplegia after intercostal neurolysis with phenol
title_full_unstemmed Paraplegia after intercostal neurolysis with phenol
title_short Paraplegia after intercostal neurolysis with phenol
title_sort paraplegia after intercostal neurolysis with phenol
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4242500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25429238
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S63570
work_keys_str_mv AT gollapallilakshman paraplegiaafterintercostalneurolysiswithphenol
AT muppurirudramanaidu paraplegiaafterintercostalneurolysiswithphenol