Cargando…
Benefits and costs of ecological restoration: Rapid assessment of changing ecosystem service values at a U.K. wetland
Restoration of degraded land is recognized by the international community as an important way of enhancing both biodiversity and ecosystem services, but more information is needed about its costs and benefits. In Cambridgeshire, U.K., a long-term initiative to convert drained, intensively farmed ara...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4242572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25505517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1248 |
_version_ | 1782345967458058240 |
---|---|
author | Peh, Kelvin S-H Balmford, Andrew Field, Rob H Lamb, Anthony Birch, Jennifer C Bradbury, Richard B Brown, Claire Butchart, Stuart H M Lester, Martin Morrison, Ross Sedgwick, Isabel Soans, Chris Stattersfield, Alison J Stroh, Peter A Swetnam, Ruth D Thomas, David H L Walpole, Matt Warrington, Stuart Hughes, Francine M R |
author_facet | Peh, Kelvin S-H Balmford, Andrew Field, Rob H Lamb, Anthony Birch, Jennifer C Bradbury, Richard B Brown, Claire Butchart, Stuart H M Lester, Martin Morrison, Ross Sedgwick, Isabel Soans, Chris Stattersfield, Alison J Stroh, Peter A Swetnam, Ruth D Thomas, David H L Walpole, Matt Warrington, Stuart Hughes, Francine M R |
author_sort | Peh, Kelvin S-H |
collection | PubMed |
description | Restoration of degraded land is recognized by the international community as an important way of enhancing both biodiversity and ecosystem services, but more information is needed about its costs and benefits. In Cambridgeshire, U.K., a long-term initiative to convert drained, intensively farmed arable land to a wetland habitat mosaic is driven by a desire both to prevent biodiversity loss from the nationally important Wicken Fen National Nature Reserve (Wicken Fen NNR) and to increase the provision of ecosystem services. We evaluated the changes in ecosystem service delivery resulting from this land conversion, using a new Toolkit for Ecosystem Service Site-based Assessment (TESSA) to estimate biophysical and monetary values of ecosystem services provided by the restored wetland mosaic compared with the former arable land. Overall results suggest that restoration is associated with a net gain to society as a whole of $199 ha(−1)y(−1), for a one-off investment in restoration of $2320 ha(−1). Restoration has led to an estimated loss of arable production of $2040 ha(−1)y(−1), but estimated gains of $671 ha(−1)y(−1) in nature-based recreation, $120 ha(−1)y(−1) from grazing, $48 ha(−1)y(−1) from flood protection, and a reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions worth an estimated $72 ha(−1)y(−1). Management costs have also declined by an estimated $1325 ha(−1)y(−1). Despite uncertainties associated with all measured values and the conservative assumptions used, we conclude that there was a substantial gain to society as a whole from this land-use conversion. The beneficiaries also changed from local arable farmers under arable production to graziers, countryside users from towns and villages, and the global community, under restoration. We emphasize that the values reported here are not necessarily transferable to other sites. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4242572 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42425722014-12-10 Benefits and costs of ecological restoration: Rapid assessment of changing ecosystem service values at a U.K. wetland Peh, Kelvin S-H Balmford, Andrew Field, Rob H Lamb, Anthony Birch, Jennifer C Bradbury, Richard B Brown, Claire Butchart, Stuart H M Lester, Martin Morrison, Ross Sedgwick, Isabel Soans, Chris Stattersfield, Alison J Stroh, Peter A Swetnam, Ruth D Thomas, David H L Walpole, Matt Warrington, Stuart Hughes, Francine M R Ecol Evol Original Research Restoration of degraded land is recognized by the international community as an important way of enhancing both biodiversity and ecosystem services, but more information is needed about its costs and benefits. In Cambridgeshire, U.K., a long-term initiative to convert drained, intensively farmed arable land to a wetland habitat mosaic is driven by a desire both to prevent biodiversity loss from the nationally important Wicken Fen National Nature Reserve (Wicken Fen NNR) and to increase the provision of ecosystem services. We evaluated the changes in ecosystem service delivery resulting from this land conversion, using a new Toolkit for Ecosystem Service Site-based Assessment (TESSA) to estimate biophysical and monetary values of ecosystem services provided by the restored wetland mosaic compared with the former arable land. Overall results suggest that restoration is associated with a net gain to society as a whole of $199 ha(−1)y(−1), for a one-off investment in restoration of $2320 ha(−1). Restoration has led to an estimated loss of arable production of $2040 ha(−1)y(−1), but estimated gains of $671 ha(−1)y(−1) in nature-based recreation, $120 ha(−1)y(−1) from grazing, $48 ha(−1)y(−1) from flood protection, and a reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions worth an estimated $72 ha(−1)y(−1). Management costs have also declined by an estimated $1325 ha(−1)y(−1). Despite uncertainties associated with all measured values and the conservative assumptions used, we conclude that there was a substantial gain to society as a whole from this land-use conversion. The beneficiaries also changed from local arable farmers under arable production to graziers, countryside users from towns and villages, and the global community, under restoration. We emphasize that the values reported here are not necessarily transferable to other sites. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014-10 2014-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4242572/ /pubmed/25505517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1248 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Peh, Kelvin S-H Balmford, Andrew Field, Rob H Lamb, Anthony Birch, Jennifer C Bradbury, Richard B Brown, Claire Butchart, Stuart H M Lester, Martin Morrison, Ross Sedgwick, Isabel Soans, Chris Stattersfield, Alison J Stroh, Peter A Swetnam, Ruth D Thomas, David H L Walpole, Matt Warrington, Stuart Hughes, Francine M R Benefits and costs of ecological restoration: Rapid assessment of changing ecosystem service values at a U.K. wetland |
title | Benefits and costs of ecological restoration: Rapid assessment of changing ecosystem service values at a U.K. wetland |
title_full | Benefits and costs of ecological restoration: Rapid assessment of changing ecosystem service values at a U.K. wetland |
title_fullStr | Benefits and costs of ecological restoration: Rapid assessment of changing ecosystem service values at a U.K. wetland |
title_full_unstemmed | Benefits and costs of ecological restoration: Rapid assessment of changing ecosystem service values at a U.K. wetland |
title_short | Benefits and costs of ecological restoration: Rapid assessment of changing ecosystem service values at a U.K. wetland |
title_sort | benefits and costs of ecological restoration: rapid assessment of changing ecosystem service values at a u.k. wetland |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4242572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25505517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1248 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pehkelvinsh benefitsandcostsofecologicalrestorationrapidassessmentofchangingecosystemservicevaluesataukwetland AT balmfordandrew benefitsandcostsofecologicalrestorationrapidassessmentofchangingecosystemservicevaluesataukwetland AT fieldrobh benefitsandcostsofecologicalrestorationrapidassessmentofchangingecosystemservicevaluesataukwetland AT lambanthony benefitsandcostsofecologicalrestorationrapidassessmentofchangingecosystemservicevaluesataukwetland AT birchjenniferc benefitsandcostsofecologicalrestorationrapidassessmentofchangingecosystemservicevaluesataukwetland AT bradburyrichardb benefitsandcostsofecologicalrestorationrapidassessmentofchangingecosystemservicevaluesataukwetland AT brownclaire benefitsandcostsofecologicalrestorationrapidassessmentofchangingecosystemservicevaluesataukwetland AT butchartstuarthm benefitsandcostsofecologicalrestorationrapidassessmentofchangingecosystemservicevaluesataukwetland AT lestermartin benefitsandcostsofecologicalrestorationrapidassessmentofchangingecosystemservicevaluesataukwetland AT morrisonross benefitsandcostsofecologicalrestorationrapidassessmentofchangingecosystemservicevaluesataukwetland AT sedgwickisabel benefitsandcostsofecologicalrestorationrapidassessmentofchangingecosystemservicevaluesataukwetland AT soanschris benefitsandcostsofecologicalrestorationrapidassessmentofchangingecosystemservicevaluesataukwetland AT stattersfieldalisonj benefitsandcostsofecologicalrestorationrapidassessmentofchangingecosystemservicevaluesataukwetland AT strohpetera benefitsandcostsofecologicalrestorationrapidassessmentofchangingecosystemservicevaluesataukwetland AT swetnamruthd benefitsandcostsofecologicalrestorationrapidassessmentofchangingecosystemservicevaluesataukwetland AT thomasdavidhl benefitsandcostsofecologicalrestorationrapidassessmentofchangingecosystemservicevaluesataukwetland AT walpolematt benefitsandcostsofecologicalrestorationrapidassessmentofchangingecosystemservicevaluesataukwetland AT warringtonstuart benefitsandcostsofecologicalrestorationrapidassessmentofchangingecosystemservicevaluesataukwetland AT hughesfrancinemr benefitsandcostsofecologicalrestorationrapidassessmentofchangingecosystemservicevaluesataukwetland |