Cargando…

Sexual size dimorphism is not associated with the evolution of parental care in frogs

Sex differences in parental care are thought to arise from differential selection on the sexes. Sexual dimorphism, including sexual size dimorphism (SSD), is often used as a proxy for sexual selection on males. Some studies have found an association between male-biased SSD (i.e., males larger than f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monroe, Melanie J, Alonzo, Suzanne H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4242581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25505526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1263
_version_ 1782345969537384448
author Monroe, Melanie J
Alonzo, Suzanne H
author_facet Monroe, Melanie J
Alonzo, Suzanne H
author_sort Monroe, Melanie J
collection PubMed
description Sex differences in parental care are thought to arise from differential selection on the sexes. Sexual dimorphism, including sexual size dimorphism (SSD), is often used as a proxy for sexual selection on males. Some studies have found an association between male-biased SSD (i.e., males larger than females) and the loss of paternal care. While the relationship between sexual selection on males and parental care evolution has been studied extensively, the relationship between female-biased SSD (i.e., females larger than males) and the evolution of parental care has received very little attention. Thus, we have little knowledge of whether female-biased SSD coevolves with parental care. In species displaying female-biased SSD, we might expect dimorphism to be associated with the evolution of paternal care or perhaps the loss of maternal care. Here, drawing on data for 99 extant frog species, we use comparative methods to evaluate how parental care and female-biased SSD have evolved over time. Generally, we find no significant correlation between the evolution of parental care and female-biased SSD in frogs. This suggests that differential selection on body size between the sexes is unlikely to have driven the evolution of parental care in these clades and questions whether we should expect sexual dimorphism to exhibit a general relationship with the evolution of sex differences in parental care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4242581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42425812014-12-10 Sexual size dimorphism is not associated with the evolution of parental care in frogs Monroe, Melanie J Alonzo, Suzanne H Ecol Evol Original Research Sex differences in parental care are thought to arise from differential selection on the sexes. Sexual dimorphism, including sexual size dimorphism (SSD), is often used as a proxy for sexual selection on males. Some studies have found an association between male-biased SSD (i.e., males larger than females) and the loss of paternal care. While the relationship between sexual selection on males and parental care evolution has been studied extensively, the relationship between female-biased SSD (i.e., females larger than males) and the evolution of parental care has received very little attention. Thus, we have little knowledge of whether female-biased SSD coevolves with parental care. In species displaying female-biased SSD, we might expect dimorphism to be associated with the evolution of paternal care or perhaps the loss of maternal care. Here, drawing on data for 99 extant frog species, we use comparative methods to evaluate how parental care and female-biased SSD have evolved over time. Generally, we find no significant correlation between the evolution of parental care and female-biased SSD in frogs. This suggests that differential selection on body size between the sexes is unlikely to have driven the evolution of parental care in these clades and questions whether we should expect sexual dimorphism to exhibit a general relationship with the evolution of sex differences in parental care. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014-10 2014-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4242581/ /pubmed/25505526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1263 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Monroe, Melanie J
Alonzo, Suzanne H
Sexual size dimorphism is not associated with the evolution of parental care in frogs
title Sexual size dimorphism is not associated with the evolution of parental care in frogs
title_full Sexual size dimorphism is not associated with the evolution of parental care in frogs
title_fullStr Sexual size dimorphism is not associated with the evolution of parental care in frogs
title_full_unstemmed Sexual size dimorphism is not associated with the evolution of parental care in frogs
title_short Sexual size dimorphism is not associated with the evolution of parental care in frogs
title_sort sexual size dimorphism is not associated with the evolution of parental care in frogs
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4242581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25505526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1263
work_keys_str_mv AT monroemelaniej sexualsizedimorphismisnotassociatedwiththeevolutionofparentalcareinfrogs
AT alonzosuzanneh sexualsizedimorphismisnotassociatedwiththeevolutionofparentalcareinfrogs