Cargando…

Impact of Ventilatory Modes on the Breathing Variability in Mechanically Ventilated Infants

Objectives: Reduction of breathing variability is associated with adverse outcome. During mechanical ventilation, the variability of ventilatory pressure is dependent on the ventilatory mode. During neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA), the support is proportional to electrical activity of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baudin, Florent, Wu, Hau-Tieng, Bordessoule, Alice, Beck, Jennifer, Jouvet, Philippe, Frasch, Martin G., Emeriaud, Guillaume
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4242927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25505779
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2014.00132
_version_ 1782346028428558336
author Baudin, Florent
Wu, Hau-Tieng
Bordessoule, Alice
Beck, Jennifer
Jouvet, Philippe
Frasch, Martin G.
Emeriaud, Guillaume
author_facet Baudin, Florent
Wu, Hau-Tieng
Bordessoule, Alice
Beck, Jennifer
Jouvet, Philippe
Frasch, Martin G.
Emeriaud, Guillaume
author_sort Baudin, Florent
collection PubMed
description Objectives: Reduction of breathing variability is associated with adverse outcome. During mechanical ventilation, the variability of ventilatory pressure is dependent on the ventilatory mode. During neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA), the support is proportional to electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi), which reflects the respiratory center output. The variability of EAdi is, therefore, translated into a similar variability in pressures. Contrastingly, conventional ventilatory modes deliver less variable pressures. The impact of the mode on the patient’s own respiratory drive is less clear. This study aims to compare the impact of NAVA, pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV), and pressure support ventilation (PSV) on the respiratory drive patterns in infants. We hypothesized that on NAVA, EAdi variability resembles most of the endogenous respiratory drive pattern seen in a control group. Methods: Electrical activity of the diaphragm was continuously recorded in 10 infants ventilated successively on NAVA (5 h), PCV (30 min), and PSV (30 min). During the last 10 min of each period, the EAdi variability pattern was assessed using non-rhythmic to rhythmic (NRR) index. These variability profiles were compared to the pattern of a control group of 11 spontaneously breathing and non-intubated infants. Results: In control infants, NRR was higher as compared to mechanically ventilated infants (p < 0.001), and NRR pattern was relatively stable over time. While the temporal stability of NRR was similar in NAVA and controls, the NRR profile was less stable during PCV. PSV exhibited an intermediary pattern. Perspectives: Mechanical ventilation impacts the breathing variability in infants. NAVA produces EAdi pattern resembling most that of control infants. NRR can be used to characterize respiratory variability in infants. Larger prospective studies are necessary to understand the differential impact of the ventilatory modes on the cardio-respiratory variability and to study their impact on clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4242927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42429272014-12-10 Impact of Ventilatory Modes on the Breathing Variability in Mechanically Ventilated Infants Baudin, Florent Wu, Hau-Tieng Bordessoule, Alice Beck, Jennifer Jouvet, Philippe Frasch, Martin G. Emeriaud, Guillaume Front Pediatr Pediatrics Objectives: Reduction of breathing variability is associated with adverse outcome. During mechanical ventilation, the variability of ventilatory pressure is dependent on the ventilatory mode. During neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA), the support is proportional to electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi), which reflects the respiratory center output. The variability of EAdi is, therefore, translated into a similar variability in pressures. Contrastingly, conventional ventilatory modes deliver less variable pressures. The impact of the mode on the patient’s own respiratory drive is less clear. This study aims to compare the impact of NAVA, pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV), and pressure support ventilation (PSV) on the respiratory drive patterns in infants. We hypothesized that on NAVA, EAdi variability resembles most of the endogenous respiratory drive pattern seen in a control group. Methods: Electrical activity of the diaphragm was continuously recorded in 10 infants ventilated successively on NAVA (5 h), PCV (30 min), and PSV (30 min). During the last 10 min of each period, the EAdi variability pattern was assessed using non-rhythmic to rhythmic (NRR) index. These variability profiles were compared to the pattern of a control group of 11 spontaneously breathing and non-intubated infants. Results: In control infants, NRR was higher as compared to mechanically ventilated infants (p < 0.001), and NRR pattern was relatively stable over time. While the temporal stability of NRR was similar in NAVA and controls, the NRR profile was less stable during PCV. PSV exhibited an intermediary pattern. Perspectives: Mechanical ventilation impacts the breathing variability in infants. NAVA produces EAdi pattern resembling most that of control infants. NRR can be used to characterize respiratory variability in infants. Larger prospective studies are necessary to understand the differential impact of the ventilatory modes on the cardio-respiratory variability and to study their impact on clinical outcomes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4242927/ /pubmed/25505779 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2014.00132 Text en Copyright © 2014 Baudin, Wu, Bordessoule, Beck, Jouvet, Frasch and Emeriaud. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Baudin, Florent
Wu, Hau-Tieng
Bordessoule, Alice
Beck, Jennifer
Jouvet, Philippe
Frasch, Martin G.
Emeriaud, Guillaume
Impact of Ventilatory Modes on the Breathing Variability in Mechanically Ventilated Infants
title Impact of Ventilatory Modes on the Breathing Variability in Mechanically Ventilated Infants
title_full Impact of Ventilatory Modes on the Breathing Variability in Mechanically Ventilated Infants
title_fullStr Impact of Ventilatory Modes on the Breathing Variability in Mechanically Ventilated Infants
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Ventilatory Modes on the Breathing Variability in Mechanically Ventilated Infants
title_short Impact of Ventilatory Modes on the Breathing Variability in Mechanically Ventilated Infants
title_sort impact of ventilatory modes on the breathing variability in mechanically ventilated infants
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4242927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25505779
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2014.00132
work_keys_str_mv AT baudinflorent impactofventilatorymodesonthebreathingvariabilityinmechanicallyventilatedinfants
AT wuhautieng impactofventilatorymodesonthebreathingvariabilityinmechanicallyventilatedinfants
AT bordessoulealice impactofventilatorymodesonthebreathingvariabilityinmechanicallyventilatedinfants
AT beckjennifer impactofventilatorymodesonthebreathingvariabilityinmechanicallyventilatedinfants
AT jouvetphilippe impactofventilatorymodesonthebreathingvariabilityinmechanicallyventilatedinfants
AT fraschmarting impactofventilatorymodesonthebreathingvariabilityinmechanicallyventilatedinfants
AT emeriaudguillaume impactofventilatorymodesonthebreathingvariabilityinmechanicallyventilatedinfants