Cargando…
Neck-specific training with a cognitive behavioural approach compared with prescribed physical activity in patients with cervical radiculopathy: a protocol of a prospective randomised clinical trial
BACKGROUND: Patients with cervical radiculopathy often have neck- and arm pain, neurological changes, activity limitations and difficulties in returning to work. Most patients are not candidates for surgery but are often treated with different conservative approaches and may be sick-listed for long...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4243421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25115308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-274 |
_version_ | 1782346098688393216 |
---|---|
author | Dedering, Åsa Halvorsen, Marie Cleland, Joshua Svensson, Mikael Peolsson, Anneli |
author_facet | Dedering, Åsa Halvorsen, Marie Cleland, Joshua Svensson, Mikael Peolsson, Anneli |
author_sort | Dedering, Åsa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients with cervical radiculopathy often have neck- and arm pain, neurological changes, activity limitations and difficulties in returning to work. Most patients are not candidates for surgery but are often treated with different conservative approaches and may be sick-listed for long periods. The purpose of the current study is to compare the effectiveness of neck-specific training versus prescribed physical activity. METHODS/DESIGN: The current protocol is a two armed intervention randomised clinical trial comparing the outcomes of patients receiving neck specific training or prescribed physical activity. A total of 144 patients with cervical radiculopathy will be randomly allocated to either of the two interventions. The interventions will be delivered by experienced physiotherapists and last 14 weeks. The primary outcome variable is neck- and arm pain intensity measured with a Visual Analogue Scale accompanied with secondary outcome measures of impairments and subjective health measurements collected before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after base-line assessment. DISCUSSION: We anticipate that the results of this study will provide evidence to support recommendations as to the effectiveness of conservative interventions for patients with cervical radiculopathy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01831271 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4243421 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42434212014-11-26 Neck-specific training with a cognitive behavioural approach compared with prescribed physical activity in patients with cervical radiculopathy: a protocol of a prospective randomised clinical trial Dedering, Åsa Halvorsen, Marie Cleland, Joshua Svensson, Mikael Peolsson, Anneli BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Patients with cervical radiculopathy often have neck- and arm pain, neurological changes, activity limitations and difficulties in returning to work. Most patients are not candidates for surgery but are often treated with different conservative approaches and may be sick-listed for long periods. The purpose of the current study is to compare the effectiveness of neck-specific training versus prescribed physical activity. METHODS/DESIGN: The current protocol is a two armed intervention randomised clinical trial comparing the outcomes of patients receiving neck specific training or prescribed physical activity. A total of 144 patients with cervical radiculopathy will be randomly allocated to either of the two interventions. The interventions will be delivered by experienced physiotherapists and last 14 weeks. The primary outcome variable is neck- and arm pain intensity measured with a Visual Analogue Scale accompanied with secondary outcome measures of impairments and subjective health measurements collected before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after base-line assessment. DISCUSSION: We anticipate that the results of this study will provide evidence to support recommendations as to the effectiveness of conservative interventions for patients with cervical radiculopathy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01831271 BioMed Central 2014-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4243421/ /pubmed/25115308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-274 Text en © Dedering et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Dedering, Åsa Halvorsen, Marie Cleland, Joshua Svensson, Mikael Peolsson, Anneli Neck-specific training with a cognitive behavioural approach compared with prescribed physical activity in patients with cervical radiculopathy: a protocol of a prospective randomised clinical trial |
title | Neck-specific training with a cognitive behavioural approach compared with prescribed physical activity in patients with cervical radiculopathy: a protocol of a prospective randomised clinical trial |
title_full | Neck-specific training with a cognitive behavioural approach compared with prescribed physical activity in patients with cervical radiculopathy: a protocol of a prospective randomised clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Neck-specific training with a cognitive behavioural approach compared with prescribed physical activity in patients with cervical radiculopathy: a protocol of a prospective randomised clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Neck-specific training with a cognitive behavioural approach compared with prescribed physical activity in patients with cervical radiculopathy: a protocol of a prospective randomised clinical trial |
title_short | Neck-specific training with a cognitive behavioural approach compared with prescribed physical activity in patients with cervical radiculopathy: a protocol of a prospective randomised clinical trial |
title_sort | neck-specific training with a cognitive behavioural approach compared with prescribed physical activity in patients with cervical radiculopathy: a protocol of a prospective randomised clinical trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4243421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25115308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-274 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dederingasa neckspecifictrainingwithacognitivebehaviouralapproachcomparedwithprescribedphysicalactivityinpatientswithcervicalradiculopathyaprotocolofaprospectiverandomisedclinicaltrial AT halvorsenmarie neckspecifictrainingwithacognitivebehaviouralapproachcomparedwithprescribedphysicalactivityinpatientswithcervicalradiculopathyaprotocolofaprospectiverandomisedclinicaltrial AT clelandjoshua neckspecifictrainingwithacognitivebehaviouralapproachcomparedwithprescribedphysicalactivityinpatientswithcervicalradiculopathyaprotocolofaprospectiverandomisedclinicaltrial AT svenssonmikael neckspecifictrainingwithacognitivebehaviouralapproachcomparedwithprescribedphysicalactivityinpatientswithcervicalradiculopathyaprotocolofaprospectiverandomisedclinicaltrial AT peolssonanneli neckspecifictrainingwithacognitivebehaviouralapproachcomparedwithprescribedphysicalactivityinpatientswithcervicalradiculopathyaprotocolofaprospectiverandomisedclinicaltrial |