Cargando…

STORIES statement: Publication standards for healthcare education evidence synthesis

BACKGROUND: Evidence synthesis techniques in healthcare education have been enhanced through the activities of experts in the field and the Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) collaborative. Despite this, significant heterogeneity in techniques and reporting of healthcare education systematic rev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gordon, Morris, Gibbs, Trevor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4243720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25190085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0143-0
_version_ 1782346133385773056
author Gordon, Morris
Gibbs, Trevor
author_facet Gordon, Morris
Gibbs, Trevor
author_sort Gordon, Morris
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence synthesis techniques in healthcare education have been enhanced through the activities of experts in the field and the Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) collaborative. Despite this, significant heterogeneity in techniques and reporting of healthcare education systematic review still exist and limit the usefulness of such reports. The aim of this project was to produce the STORIES (STructured apprOach to the Reporting In healthcare education of Evidence Synthesis) statement to offer a guide for reporting evidence synthesis in health education for use by authors and journal editors. METHODS: A review of existing published evidence synthesis consensus statements was undertaken. A modified Delphi process was used. In stage one, expert participants were asked to state whether common existing items identified were relevant, to suggest relevant texts and specify any items they feel should be included. The results were analysed and a second stage commenced where all synthesised items were presented and participants asked to state whether they should be included or amend as needed. After further analysis, the full statement was sent for final review and comment. RESULTS: Nineteen experts participated in the panel from 35 invitations. Thirteen text sources were proposed, six existing items amended and twelve new items synthesised. After stage two, 25 amended consensus items were proposed for inclusion. The final statement contains several items unique to this context, including description of relevant conceptual frameworks or theoretical constructs, description of qualitative methodologies with rationale for their choice and presenting the implications for educators in practice of the results obtained. CONCLUSIONS: An international expert panel has agreed upon a consensus statement of 25 items for the reporting of evidence synthesis within healthcare education. This unique set of items is focused on context, rather than a specific methodology. This statement can be used for those writing for publication and reviewing such manuscripts to ensure reporting supports and best informs the wider healthcare education community. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12916-014-0143-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4243720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42437202014-11-26 STORIES statement: Publication standards for healthcare education evidence synthesis Gordon, Morris Gibbs, Trevor BMC Med Guideline BACKGROUND: Evidence synthesis techniques in healthcare education have been enhanced through the activities of experts in the field and the Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) collaborative. Despite this, significant heterogeneity in techniques and reporting of healthcare education systematic review still exist and limit the usefulness of such reports. The aim of this project was to produce the STORIES (STructured apprOach to the Reporting In healthcare education of Evidence Synthesis) statement to offer a guide for reporting evidence synthesis in health education for use by authors and journal editors. METHODS: A review of existing published evidence synthesis consensus statements was undertaken. A modified Delphi process was used. In stage one, expert participants were asked to state whether common existing items identified were relevant, to suggest relevant texts and specify any items they feel should be included. The results were analysed and a second stage commenced where all synthesised items were presented and participants asked to state whether they should be included or amend as needed. After further analysis, the full statement was sent for final review and comment. RESULTS: Nineteen experts participated in the panel from 35 invitations. Thirteen text sources were proposed, six existing items amended and twelve new items synthesised. After stage two, 25 amended consensus items were proposed for inclusion. The final statement contains several items unique to this context, including description of relevant conceptual frameworks or theoretical constructs, description of qualitative methodologies with rationale for their choice and presenting the implications for educators in practice of the results obtained. CONCLUSIONS: An international expert panel has agreed upon a consensus statement of 25 items for the reporting of evidence synthesis within healthcare education. This unique set of items is focused on context, rather than a specific methodology. This statement can be used for those writing for publication and reviewing such manuscripts to ensure reporting supports and best informs the wider healthcare education community. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12916-014-0143-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4243720/ /pubmed/25190085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0143-0 Text en © Gordon and Gibbs; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Guideline
Gordon, Morris
Gibbs, Trevor
STORIES statement: Publication standards for healthcare education evidence synthesis
title STORIES statement: Publication standards for healthcare education evidence synthesis
title_full STORIES statement: Publication standards for healthcare education evidence synthesis
title_fullStr STORIES statement: Publication standards for healthcare education evidence synthesis
title_full_unstemmed STORIES statement: Publication standards for healthcare education evidence synthesis
title_short STORIES statement: Publication standards for healthcare education evidence synthesis
title_sort stories statement: publication standards for healthcare education evidence synthesis
topic Guideline
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4243720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25190085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0143-0
work_keys_str_mv AT gordonmorris storiesstatementpublicationstandardsforhealthcareeducationevidencesynthesis
AT gibbstrevor storiesstatementpublicationstandardsforhealthcareeducationevidencesynthesis