Cargando…

Molecular detection of tick-borne pathogens in captive wild felids, Zimbabwe

BACKGROUND: The populations of wild felids in Africa, of especially lions (Panthera leo) and cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus), are declining and the species are classified as vulnerable to extinction by the International Union for Conservation of Nature. As infections with tick-borne pathogens (TBP) can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kelly, Patrick, Marabini, Lisa, Dutlow, Keith, Zhang, Jilei, Loftis, Amanda, Wang, Chengming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4243927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25404084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-014-0514-6
_version_ 1782346159658893312
author Kelly, Patrick
Marabini, Lisa
Dutlow, Keith
Zhang, Jilei
Loftis, Amanda
Wang, Chengming
author_facet Kelly, Patrick
Marabini, Lisa
Dutlow, Keith
Zhang, Jilei
Loftis, Amanda
Wang, Chengming
author_sort Kelly, Patrick
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The populations of wild felids in Africa, of especially lions (Panthera leo) and cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus), are declining and the species are classified as vulnerable to extinction by the International Union for Conservation of Nature. As infections with tick-borne pathogens (TBP) can become more of a problem in wild felids, there are relatively few studies on TBP in wild felids in Africa and on how these infections might influence population numbers. METHODS: To gain further knowledge on TBP in captive wild felids in Southern Africa, we collected whole blood from captive lions, Southern African wildcats, cheetahs and servals in Zimbabwe for PCRs against the 18S rRNA gene of the piroplasmids (Babesia, Theileria, Cytauxzoon) and Hepatozoon spp., and the 16S rRNA gene of Ehrlichia and Anaplasma spp. RESULTS: Overall, 78% of the lions (67/86) and all the Southern African wildcats (6/6), cheetahs (4/4) and servals (2/2) had evidence of infection with at least one organism. The organisms most commonly detected in the lions were B. leo (59%; 51/86), B. vogeli (12%; 10/86) and H. felis (11%; 9/86) while all the Southern African wildcats and servals were positive for B. vogeli and all the cheetahs were positive for B. leo. Mixed infections were found in 22% (15/67) of the PCR positive lions, most commonly B. leo and H. felis (27%; 4/15), and in 1 (50%) of the servals (B. vogeli and A. phagocytophilum). Two lions were infected with three TBP, mainly B. leo, H. canis and T. parva, and B. leo, A. phagocytophilum and T. sinensis. Mixed infections with B. vogeli and A. phagocytophilum were seen in a serval and a Southern African wildcat. Other TBP were detected at a low prevalence (≤2%) in lions, mainly H. canis, T. sinensis, T. parva, C. manul, E. canis, and E. canis-like and B. odocoilei-like organisms. CONCLUSIONS: Infections with tick-borne agents are common in captive wild felids in Zimbabwe.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4243927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42439272014-11-26 Molecular detection of tick-borne pathogens in captive wild felids, Zimbabwe Kelly, Patrick Marabini, Lisa Dutlow, Keith Zhang, Jilei Loftis, Amanda Wang, Chengming Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: The populations of wild felids in Africa, of especially lions (Panthera leo) and cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus), are declining and the species are classified as vulnerable to extinction by the International Union for Conservation of Nature. As infections with tick-borne pathogens (TBP) can become more of a problem in wild felids, there are relatively few studies on TBP in wild felids in Africa and on how these infections might influence population numbers. METHODS: To gain further knowledge on TBP in captive wild felids in Southern Africa, we collected whole blood from captive lions, Southern African wildcats, cheetahs and servals in Zimbabwe for PCRs against the 18S rRNA gene of the piroplasmids (Babesia, Theileria, Cytauxzoon) and Hepatozoon spp., and the 16S rRNA gene of Ehrlichia and Anaplasma spp. RESULTS: Overall, 78% of the lions (67/86) and all the Southern African wildcats (6/6), cheetahs (4/4) and servals (2/2) had evidence of infection with at least one organism. The organisms most commonly detected in the lions were B. leo (59%; 51/86), B. vogeli (12%; 10/86) and H. felis (11%; 9/86) while all the Southern African wildcats and servals were positive for B. vogeli and all the cheetahs were positive for B. leo. Mixed infections were found in 22% (15/67) of the PCR positive lions, most commonly B. leo and H. felis (27%; 4/15), and in 1 (50%) of the servals (B. vogeli and A. phagocytophilum). Two lions were infected with three TBP, mainly B. leo, H. canis and T. parva, and B. leo, A. phagocytophilum and T. sinensis. Mixed infections with B. vogeli and A. phagocytophilum were seen in a serval and a Southern African wildcat. Other TBP were detected at a low prevalence (≤2%) in lions, mainly H. canis, T. sinensis, T. parva, C. manul, E. canis, and E. canis-like and B. odocoilei-like organisms. CONCLUSIONS: Infections with tick-borne agents are common in captive wild felids in Zimbabwe. BioMed Central 2014-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4243927/ /pubmed/25404084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-014-0514-6 Text en © Kelly et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kelly, Patrick
Marabini, Lisa
Dutlow, Keith
Zhang, Jilei
Loftis, Amanda
Wang, Chengming
Molecular detection of tick-borne pathogens in captive wild felids, Zimbabwe
title Molecular detection of tick-borne pathogens in captive wild felids, Zimbabwe
title_full Molecular detection of tick-borne pathogens in captive wild felids, Zimbabwe
title_fullStr Molecular detection of tick-borne pathogens in captive wild felids, Zimbabwe
title_full_unstemmed Molecular detection of tick-borne pathogens in captive wild felids, Zimbabwe
title_short Molecular detection of tick-borne pathogens in captive wild felids, Zimbabwe
title_sort molecular detection of tick-borne pathogens in captive wild felids, zimbabwe
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4243927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25404084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-014-0514-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kellypatrick moleculardetectionoftickbornepathogensincaptivewildfelidszimbabwe
AT marabinilisa moleculardetectionoftickbornepathogensincaptivewildfelidszimbabwe
AT dutlowkeith moleculardetectionoftickbornepathogensincaptivewildfelidszimbabwe
AT zhangjilei moleculardetectionoftickbornepathogensincaptivewildfelidszimbabwe
AT loftisamanda moleculardetectionoftickbornepathogensincaptivewildfelidszimbabwe
AT wangchengming moleculardetectionoftickbornepathogensincaptivewildfelidszimbabwe