Cargando…

Comprehensive Phylogenetic Analysis of Bacterial Reverse Transcriptases

Much less is known about reverse transcriptases (RTs) in prokaryotes than in eukaryotes, with most prokaryotic enzymes still uncharacterized. Two surveys involving BLAST searches for RT genes in prokaryotic genomes revealed the presence of large numbers of diverse, uncharacterized RTs and RT-like se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toro, Nicolás, Nisa-Martínez, Rafael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4244168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25423096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114083
_version_ 1782346201373343744
author Toro, Nicolás
Nisa-Martínez, Rafael
author_facet Toro, Nicolás
Nisa-Martínez, Rafael
author_sort Toro, Nicolás
collection PubMed
description Much less is known about reverse transcriptases (RTs) in prokaryotes than in eukaryotes, with most prokaryotic enzymes still uncharacterized. Two surveys involving BLAST searches for RT genes in prokaryotic genomes revealed the presence of large numbers of diverse, uncharacterized RTs and RT-like sequences. Here, using consistent annotation across all sequenced bacterial species from GenBank and other sources via RAST, available from the PATRIC (Pathogenic Resource Integration Center) platform, we have compiled the data for currently annotated reverse transcriptases from completely sequenced bacterial genomes. RT sequences are broadly distributed across bacterial phyla, but green sulfur bacteria and cyanobacteria have the highest levels of RT sequence diversity (≤85% identity) per genome. By contrast, phylum Actinobacteria, for which a large number of genomes have been sequenced, was found to have a low RT sequence diversity. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that bacterial RTs could be classified into 17 main groups: group II introns, retrons/retron-like RTs, diversity-generating retroelements (DGRs), Abi-like RTs, CRISPR-Cas-associated RTs, group II-like RTs (G2L), and 11 other groups of RTs of unknown function. Proteobacteria had the highest potential functional diversity, as they possessed most of the RT groups. Group II introns and DGRs were the most widely distributed RTs in bacterial phyla. Our results provide insights into bacterial RT phylogeny and the basis for an update of annotation systems based on sequence/domain homology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4244168
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42441682014-12-05 Comprehensive Phylogenetic Analysis of Bacterial Reverse Transcriptases Toro, Nicolás Nisa-Martínez, Rafael PLoS One Research Article Much less is known about reverse transcriptases (RTs) in prokaryotes than in eukaryotes, with most prokaryotic enzymes still uncharacterized. Two surveys involving BLAST searches for RT genes in prokaryotic genomes revealed the presence of large numbers of diverse, uncharacterized RTs and RT-like sequences. Here, using consistent annotation across all sequenced bacterial species from GenBank and other sources via RAST, available from the PATRIC (Pathogenic Resource Integration Center) platform, we have compiled the data for currently annotated reverse transcriptases from completely sequenced bacterial genomes. RT sequences are broadly distributed across bacterial phyla, but green sulfur bacteria and cyanobacteria have the highest levels of RT sequence diversity (≤85% identity) per genome. By contrast, phylum Actinobacteria, for which a large number of genomes have been sequenced, was found to have a low RT sequence diversity. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that bacterial RTs could be classified into 17 main groups: group II introns, retrons/retron-like RTs, diversity-generating retroelements (DGRs), Abi-like RTs, CRISPR-Cas-associated RTs, group II-like RTs (G2L), and 11 other groups of RTs of unknown function. Proteobacteria had the highest potential functional diversity, as they possessed most of the RT groups. Group II introns and DGRs were the most widely distributed RTs in bacterial phyla. Our results provide insights into bacterial RT phylogeny and the basis for an update of annotation systems based on sequence/domain homology. Public Library of Science 2014-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4244168/ /pubmed/25423096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114083 Text en © 2014 Toro, Nisa-Martinez http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Toro, Nicolás
Nisa-Martínez, Rafael
Comprehensive Phylogenetic Analysis of Bacterial Reverse Transcriptases
title Comprehensive Phylogenetic Analysis of Bacterial Reverse Transcriptases
title_full Comprehensive Phylogenetic Analysis of Bacterial Reverse Transcriptases
title_fullStr Comprehensive Phylogenetic Analysis of Bacterial Reverse Transcriptases
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive Phylogenetic Analysis of Bacterial Reverse Transcriptases
title_short Comprehensive Phylogenetic Analysis of Bacterial Reverse Transcriptases
title_sort comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of bacterial reverse transcriptases
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4244168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25423096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114083
work_keys_str_mv AT toronicolas comprehensivephylogeneticanalysisofbacterialreversetranscriptases
AT nisamartinezrafael comprehensivephylogeneticanalysisofbacterialreversetranscriptases