Cargando…

Effects of female genital cutting on physical health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: Worldwide, an estimated 125 million girls and women live with female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C). We aimed to systematically review the evidence for physical health risks associated with FGM/C. DESIGN: We searched 15 databases to identify studies (up to January 2012). Selection cri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berg, Rigmor C, Underland, Vigdis, Odgaard-Jensen, Jan, Fretheim, Atle, Vist, Gunn E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4244458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25416059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006316
_version_ 1782346230714597376
author Berg, Rigmor C
Underland, Vigdis
Odgaard-Jensen, Jan
Fretheim, Atle
Vist, Gunn E
author_facet Berg, Rigmor C
Underland, Vigdis
Odgaard-Jensen, Jan
Fretheim, Atle
Vist, Gunn E
author_sort Berg, Rigmor C
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Worldwide, an estimated 125 million girls and women live with female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C). We aimed to systematically review the evidence for physical health risks associated with FGM/C. DESIGN: We searched 15 databases to identify studies (up to January 2012). Selection criteria were empirical studies reporting physical health outcomes from FGM/C, affecting females with any type of FGM/C, irrespective of ethnicity, nationality and age. Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts, applied eligibility criteria, assessed methodological study quality and extracted full-text data. To derive overall risk estimates, we combined data from included studies using the Mantel-Haenszel method for unadjusted dichotomous data and the generic inverse-variance method for adjusted data. Outcomes that were sufficiently similar across studies and reasonably resistant to biases were aggregated in meta-analyses. We applied the instrument Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation to assess the extent to which we have confidence in the effect estimates. RESULTS: Our search returned 5109 results, of which 185 studies (3.17 million women) satisfied the inclusion criteria. The risks of systematic and random errors were variable and we focused on key outcomes from the 57 studies with the best available evidence. The most common immediate complications were excessive bleeding, urine retention and genital tissue swelling. The most valid and statistically significant associations for the physical health sequelae of FGM/C were seen on urinary tract infections (unadjusted RR=3.01), bacterial vaginosis (adjusted OR (AOR)=1.68), dyspareunia (RR=1.53), prolonged labour (AOR=1.49), caesarean section (AOR=1.60), and difficult delivery (AOR=1.88). CONCLUSIONS: While the precise estimation of the frequency and risk of immediate, gynaecological, sexual and obstetric complications is not possible, the results weigh against the continuation of FGM/C and support the diagnosis and management of girls and women suffering the physical risks of FGM/C. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42012003321.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4244458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42444582014-11-28 Effects of female genital cutting on physical health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis Berg, Rigmor C Underland, Vigdis Odgaard-Jensen, Jan Fretheim, Atle Vist, Gunn E BMJ Open Global Health OBJECTIVE: Worldwide, an estimated 125 million girls and women live with female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C). We aimed to systematically review the evidence for physical health risks associated with FGM/C. DESIGN: We searched 15 databases to identify studies (up to January 2012). Selection criteria were empirical studies reporting physical health outcomes from FGM/C, affecting females with any type of FGM/C, irrespective of ethnicity, nationality and age. Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts, applied eligibility criteria, assessed methodological study quality and extracted full-text data. To derive overall risk estimates, we combined data from included studies using the Mantel-Haenszel method for unadjusted dichotomous data and the generic inverse-variance method for adjusted data. Outcomes that were sufficiently similar across studies and reasonably resistant to biases were aggregated in meta-analyses. We applied the instrument Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation to assess the extent to which we have confidence in the effect estimates. RESULTS: Our search returned 5109 results, of which 185 studies (3.17 million women) satisfied the inclusion criteria. The risks of systematic and random errors were variable and we focused on key outcomes from the 57 studies with the best available evidence. The most common immediate complications were excessive bleeding, urine retention and genital tissue swelling. The most valid and statistically significant associations for the physical health sequelae of FGM/C were seen on urinary tract infections (unadjusted RR=3.01), bacterial vaginosis (adjusted OR (AOR)=1.68), dyspareunia (RR=1.53), prolonged labour (AOR=1.49), caesarean section (AOR=1.60), and difficult delivery (AOR=1.88). CONCLUSIONS: While the precise estimation of the frequency and risk of immediate, gynaecological, sexual and obstetric complications is not possible, the results weigh against the continuation of FGM/C and support the diagnosis and management of girls and women suffering the physical risks of FGM/C. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42012003321. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4244458/ /pubmed/25416059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006316 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Global Health
Berg, Rigmor C
Underland, Vigdis
Odgaard-Jensen, Jan
Fretheim, Atle
Vist, Gunn E
Effects of female genital cutting on physical health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Effects of female genital cutting on physical health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Effects of female genital cutting on physical health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effects of female genital cutting on physical health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effects of female genital cutting on physical health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Effects of female genital cutting on physical health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effects of female genital cutting on physical health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Global Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4244458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25416059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006316
work_keys_str_mv AT bergrigmorc effectsoffemalegenitalcuttingonphysicalhealthoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT underlandvigdis effectsoffemalegenitalcuttingonphysicalhealthoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT odgaardjensenjan effectsoffemalegenitalcuttingonphysicalhealthoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fretheimatle effectsoffemalegenitalcuttingonphysicalhealthoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vistgunne effectsoffemalegenitalcuttingonphysicalhealthoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis