Cargando…

Recognition and reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions by surveyed healthcare professionals in Uganda: key determinants

OBJECTIVE: To assess extent and determinants of past-month recognition of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADR) and past-year ADR reporting among healthcare professionals (HCPs) in Uganda. SETTING: Geographically diverse health facilities (public, private for-profit, private not-for-profit). PARTIC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kiguba, Ronald, Karamagi, Charles, Waako, Paul, Ndagije, Helen B, Bird, Sheila M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4244492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25421337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005869
_version_ 1782346232089280512
author Kiguba, Ronald
Karamagi, Charles
Waako, Paul
Ndagije, Helen B
Bird, Sheila M
author_facet Kiguba, Ronald
Karamagi, Charles
Waako, Paul
Ndagije, Helen B
Bird, Sheila M
author_sort Kiguba, Ronald
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess extent and determinants of past-month recognition of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADR) and past-year ADR reporting among healthcare professionals (HCPs) in Uganda. SETTING: Geographically diverse health facilities (public, private for-profit, private not-for-profit). PARTICIPANTS: Of 2000 questionnaires distributed, 1345 were completed: return rate of 67%. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Per cent HCPs who suspected ADR in the past month; reported ADR in the past year. RESULTS: Nurses were the majority (59%, 792/1345). Only half the respondents had heard about pharmacovigilance: 39% of nurses (295/763; 95% CI 35% to 42%), 70% otherwise (383/547; 95% CI 66% to 74%). One fifth (268/1289 or 21%; 95% CI 19% to 23%) had suspected an ADR in the previous 4 weeks, 111 of them were nurses; 15% (190/1296) had reported a suspected ADR in the past year, 103 of them were nurses. Past-month ADR suspicion was more likely by non-nurses (OR=1.7, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.40) and with medical research involvement (OR=1.5, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.15) but past-month receipt of patient ADR-complaint predominated (OR=19, 95% CI 14 to 28). Past-year ADR reporting was higher by hospital staff (OR=1.9, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.10), especially in medicine (OR=2.3, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.73); but lower from private for-profit health facilities (OR=0.5, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.77) and by older staff (OR=0.6, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.91); more likely by HCPs who had ever encountered a fatal ADR (OR=2.9, 95% CI 1.94 to 4.25), knew to whom to report (OR=1.7, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.46), or suggested how to improve ADR reporting (OR=1.6, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.49). Two attitudinal factors were important: diffidence and lethargy. CONCLUSIONS: One in five HCPs suspected an ADR in the past-month and one in seven reported ADR in the previous year. Empowering patients could strengthen ADR detection and reporting in Africa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4244492
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42444922014-11-28 Recognition and reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions by surveyed healthcare professionals in Uganda: key determinants Kiguba, Ronald Karamagi, Charles Waako, Paul Ndagije, Helen B Bird, Sheila M BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To assess extent and determinants of past-month recognition of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADR) and past-year ADR reporting among healthcare professionals (HCPs) in Uganda. SETTING: Geographically diverse health facilities (public, private for-profit, private not-for-profit). PARTICIPANTS: Of 2000 questionnaires distributed, 1345 were completed: return rate of 67%. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Per cent HCPs who suspected ADR in the past month; reported ADR in the past year. RESULTS: Nurses were the majority (59%, 792/1345). Only half the respondents had heard about pharmacovigilance: 39% of nurses (295/763; 95% CI 35% to 42%), 70% otherwise (383/547; 95% CI 66% to 74%). One fifth (268/1289 or 21%; 95% CI 19% to 23%) had suspected an ADR in the previous 4 weeks, 111 of them were nurses; 15% (190/1296) had reported a suspected ADR in the past year, 103 of them were nurses. Past-month ADR suspicion was more likely by non-nurses (OR=1.7, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.40) and with medical research involvement (OR=1.5, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.15) but past-month receipt of patient ADR-complaint predominated (OR=19, 95% CI 14 to 28). Past-year ADR reporting was higher by hospital staff (OR=1.9, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.10), especially in medicine (OR=2.3, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.73); but lower from private for-profit health facilities (OR=0.5, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.77) and by older staff (OR=0.6, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.91); more likely by HCPs who had ever encountered a fatal ADR (OR=2.9, 95% CI 1.94 to 4.25), knew to whom to report (OR=1.7, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.46), or suggested how to improve ADR reporting (OR=1.6, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.49). Two attitudinal factors were important: diffidence and lethargy. CONCLUSIONS: One in five HCPs suspected an ADR in the past-month and one in seven reported ADR in the previous year. Empowering patients could strengthen ADR detection and reporting in Africa. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4244492/ /pubmed/25421337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005869 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Kiguba, Ronald
Karamagi, Charles
Waako, Paul
Ndagije, Helen B
Bird, Sheila M
Recognition and reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions by surveyed healthcare professionals in Uganda: key determinants
title Recognition and reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions by surveyed healthcare professionals in Uganda: key determinants
title_full Recognition and reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions by surveyed healthcare professionals in Uganda: key determinants
title_fullStr Recognition and reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions by surveyed healthcare professionals in Uganda: key determinants
title_full_unstemmed Recognition and reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions by surveyed healthcare professionals in Uganda: key determinants
title_short Recognition and reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions by surveyed healthcare professionals in Uganda: key determinants
title_sort recognition and reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions by surveyed healthcare professionals in uganda: key determinants
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4244492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25421337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005869
work_keys_str_mv AT kigubaronald recognitionandreportingofsuspectedadversedrugreactionsbysurveyedhealthcareprofessionalsinugandakeydeterminants
AT karamagicharles recognitionandreportingofsuspectedadversedrugreactionsbysurveyedhealthcareprofessionalsinugandakeydeterminants
AT waakopaul recognitionandreportingofsuspectedadversedrugreactionsbysurveyedhealthcareprofessionalsinugandakeydeterminants
AT ndagijehelenb recognitionandreportingofsuspectedadversedrugreactionsbysurveyedhealthcareprofessionalsinugandakeydeterminants
AT birdsheilam recognitionandreportingofsuspectedadversedrugreactionsbysurveyedhealthcareprofessionalsinugandakeydeterminants