Cargando…

A Phase II Study of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Low-Intermediate-High-Risk Prostate Cancer Using Helical Tomotherapy: Dose-Volumetric Parameters Predicting Early Toxicity

Endpoint: To assess early urinary (GU) and rectal (GI) toxicities after helical tomotherapy Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and to determine their predictive factors. Methods: Since May 2012, 45 prostate cancer patients were treated with eight fractions of 5.48 (low risk, 29%) or 5.65 Gy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Macias, Victor A., Blanco, Manuel L., Barrera, Inmaculada, Garcia, Rafael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4244529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25505734
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2014.00336
_version_ 1782346233028804608
author Macias, Victor A.
Blanco, Manuel L.
Barrera, Inmaculada
Garcia, Rafael
author_facet Macias, Victor A.
Blanco, Manuel L.
Barrera, Inmaculada
Garcia, Rafael
author_sort Macias, Victor A.
collection PubMed
description Endpoint: To assess early urinary (GU) and rectal (GI) toxicities after helical tomotherapy Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and to determine their predictive factors. Methods: Since May 2012, 45 prostate cancer patients were treated with eight fractions of 5.48 (low risk, 29%) or 5.65 Gy (intermediate-high risk, 71%) on alternative days over 2.5 weeks. The exclusion criteria were Gleason score 9–10, PSA >40 ng/mL, cT3b-4, IPSS ≥20, and history of acute urinary retention. During the follow-up, a set of potential prognostic factors was correlated with urinary or rectal toxicity. Results: The median follow-up was 13.8 months (2–25 months). There were no grade ≥3 toxicities. Acute grade 2 GU complications were found in a 22.7% of men, but in 2.3% of patients at 1 month, 0% at 6 months, and 0% at 12 months. The correspondent figures for grade 2 GI toxicities were 20.4% (acute), 2.3% (1 month), 3.6% (6 months), and 5% (12 months). Acute GI toxicity was significantly correlated with the rectal volume (>15 cm(3)) receiving 28 Gy, only when expressed as absolute volume. The age (>72 years old) was a predictor of GI toxicity after 1 month of treatment. No correlation was found, however, between urinary toxicity and the other analyzed variables. IPSS increased significantly at the time of the last fraction and within the first month, returning to the baseline at sixth month. Urinary-related quality of life (IPSS question 8 score), it was not significantly worsen during radiotherapy returning to the baseline levels 1 month after the treatment. At 12 months follow-up patient’s perception of their urinary function improved significantly in comparison with the baseline. Conclusion: Our scheme of eight fractions on alternative days delivered using helical tomotherapy is well tolerated. We recommend using actual volume instead of percentual volume in the treatment planning, and not to exceed 15 cm(3) of rectal volume receiving ≥25 Gy in order to diminish acute GI toxicity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4244529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42445292014-12-10 A Phase II Study of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Low-Intermediate-High-Risk Prostate Cancer Using Helical Tomotherapy: Dose-Volumetric Parameters Predicting Early Toxicity Macias, Victor A. Blanco, Manuel L. Barrera, Inmaculada Garcia, Rafael Front Oncol Oncology Endpoint: To assess early urinary (GU) and rectal (GI) toxicities after helical tomotherapy Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and to determine their predictive factors. Methods: Since May 2012, 45 prostate cancer patients were treated with eight fractions of 5.48 (low risk, 29%) or 5.65 Gy (intermediate-high risk, 71%) on alternative days over 2.5 weeks. The exclusion criteria were Gleason score 9–10, PSA >40 ng/mL, cT3b-4, IPSS ≥20, and history of acute urinary retention. During the follow-up, a set of potential prognostic factors was correlated with urinary or rectal toxicity. Results: The median follow-up was 13.8 months (2–25 months). There were no grade ≥3 toxicities. Acute grade 2 GU complications were found in a 22.7% of men, but in 2.3% of patients at 1 month, 0% at 6 months, and 0% at 12 months. The correspondent figures for grade 2 GI toxicities were 20.4% (acute), 2.3% (1 month), 3.6% (6 months), and 5% (12 months). Acute GI toxicity was significantly correlated with the rectal volume (>15 cm(3)) receiving 28 Gy, only when expressed as absolute volume. The age (>72 years old) was a predictor of GI toxicity after 1 month of treatment. No correlation was found, however, between urinary toxicity and the other analyzed variables. IPSS increased significantly at the time of the last fraction and within the first month, returning to the baseline at sixth month. Urinary-related quality of life (IPSS question 8 score), it was not significantly worsen during radiotherapy returning to the baseline levels 1 month after the treatment. At 12 months follow-up patient’s perception of their urinary function improved significantly in comparison with the baseline. Conclusion: Our scheme of eight fractions on alternative days delivered using helical tomotherapy is well tolerated. We recommend using actual volume instead of percentual volume in the treatment planning, and not to exceed 15 cm(3) of rectal volume receiving ≥25 Gy in order to diminish acute GI toxicity. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4244529/ /pubmed/25505734 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2014.00336 Text en Copyright © 2014 Macias, Blanco, Barrera and Garcia. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Macias, Victor A.
Blanco, Manuel L.
Barrera, Inmaculada
Garcia, Rafael
A Phase II Study of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Low-Intermediate-High-Risk Prostate Cancer Using Helical Tomotherapy: Dose-Volumetric Parameters Predicting Early Toxicity
title A Phase II Study of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Low-Intermediate-High-Risk Prostate Cancer Using Helical Tomotherapy: Dose-Volumetric Parameters Predicting Early Toxicity
title_full A Phase II Study of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Low-Intermediate-High-Risk Prostate Cancer Using Helical Tomotherapy: Dose-Volumetric Parameters Predicting Early Toxicity
title_fullStr A Phase II Study of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Low-Intermediate-High-Risk Prostate Cancer Using Helical Tomotherapy: Dose-Volumetric Parameters Predicting Early Toxicity
title_full_unstemmed A Phase II Study of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Low-Intermediate-High-Risk Prostate Cancer Using Helical Tomotherapy: Dose-Volumetric Parameters Predicting Early Toxicity
title_short A Phase II Study of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Low-Intermediate-High-Risk Prostate Cancer Using Helical Tomotherapy: Dose-Volumetric Parameters Predicting Early Toxicity
title_sort phase ii study of stereotactic body radiation therapy for low-intermediate-high-risk prostate cancer using helical tomotherapy: dose-volumetric parameters predicting early toxicity
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4244529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25505734
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2014.00336
work_keys_str_mv AT maciasvictora aphaseiistudyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforlowintermediatehighriskprostatecancerusinghelicaltomotherapydosevolumetricparameterspredictingearlytoxicity
AT blancomanuell aphaseiistudyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforlowintermediatehighriskprostatecancerusinghelicaltomotherapydosevolumetricparameterspredictingearlytoxicity
AT barrerainmaculada aphaseiistudyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforlowintermediatehighriskprostatecancerusinghelicaltomotherapydosevolumetricparameterspredictingearlytoxicity
AT garciarafael aphaseiistudyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforlowintermediatehighriskprostatecancerusinghelicaltomotherapydosevolumetricparameterspredictingearlytoxicity
AT maciasvictora phaseiistudyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforlowintermediatehighriskprostatecancerusinghelicaltomotherapydosevolumetricparameterspredictingearlytoxicity
AT blancomanuell phaseiistudyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforlowintermediatehighriskprostatecancerusinghelicaltomotherapydosevolumetricparameterspredictingearlytoxicity
AT barrerainmaculada phaseiistudyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforlowintermediatehighriskprostatecancerusinghelicaltomotherapydosevolumetricparameterspredictingearlytoxicity
AT garciarafael phaseiistudyofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforlowintermediatehighriskprostatecancerusinghelicaltomotherapydosevolumetricparameterspredictingearlytoxicity