Cargando…

Comparison of two optical biometers in intraocular lens power calculation

AIMS: To compare the consistency and accuracy in ocular biometric measurements and intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations using the new optical low-coherence reflectometry and partial coherence interferometry. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The clinical data of 122 eyes of 72 cataract patients were analyz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hui, Sheng, Yi, Lu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4244739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25370395
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.143930
_version_ 1782346267551072256
author Hui, Sheng
Yi, Lu
author_facet Hui, Sheng
Yi, Lu
author_sort Hui, Sheng
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To compare the consistency and accuracy in ocular biometric measurements and intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations using the new optical low-coherence reflectometry and partial coherence interferometry. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The clinical data of 122 eyes of 72 cataract patients were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were measured with a new optical low-coherence reflectometry system, using the LENSTAR LS 900 (Haag Streit AG)/ALLEGRO BioGraph biometer (Wavelight., AG), and partial coherence interferometry (IOLMaster V.5.4 [Carl Zeiss., Meditec, AG]) before phacoemulsification and IOL implantation. Repeated measurements, as recommended by the manufacturers, were performed by the same examiner with both devices. Using the parameters of axial length (AL), corneal refractive power (K1 and K2), and anterior chamber depth (ACD), power calculations for AcrySof SA60AT IOL were compared between the two devices using five formulas. The target was emmetropia. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software (SPSS 13.0) with t-test as well as linear regression. A P value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: The mean age of 72 cataract patients was 64.6 years ± 13.4 [standard deviation]. Of the biometry parameters, K1, K2 and [K1 + K2]/2 values were significantly different between the two devices (mean difference, K1: −0.05 ± 0.21 D; K2: −0.12 ± 0.20 D; [K1 + K2]/2: −0.08 ± 0.14 D. P <0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in AL and ACD between the two devices. The correlations of AL, K1, K2, and ACD between the two devices were high. The mean differences in IOL power calculations using the five formulas were not statistically significant between the two devices. CONCLUSIONS: New optical low-coherence reflectometry provides measurements that correlate well to those of partial coherence interferometry, thus it is a precise device that can be used for the pre-operative examination of cataract patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4244739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42447392014-12-01 Comparison of two optical biometers in intraocular lens power calculation Hui, Sheng Yi, Lu Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article AIMS: To compare the consistency and accuracy in ocular biometric measurements and intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations using the new optical low-coherence reflectometry and partial coherence interferometry. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The clinical data of 122 eyes of 72 cataract patients were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were measured with a new optical low-coherence reflectometry system, using the LENSTAR LS 900 (Haag Streit AG)/ALLEGRO BioGraph biometer (Wavelight., AG), and partial coherence interferometry (IOLMaster V.5.4 [Carl Zeiss., Meditec, AG]) before phacoemulsification and IOL implantation. Repeated measurements, as recommended by the manufacturers, were performed by the same examiner with both devices. Using the parameters of axial length (AL), corneal refractive power (K1 and K2), and anterior chamber depth (ACD), power calculations for AcrySof SA60AT IOL were compared between the two devices using five formulas. The target was emmetropia. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software (SPSS 13.0) with t-test as well as linear regression. A P value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: The mean age of 72 cataract patients was 64.6 years ± 13.4 [standard deviation]. Of the biometry parameters, K1, K2 and [K1 + K2]/2 values were significantly different between the two devices (mean difference, K1: −0.05 ± 0.21 D; K2: −0.12 ± 0.20 D; [K1 + K2]/2: −0.08 ± 0.14 D. P <0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in AL and ACD between the two devices. The correlations of AL, K1, K2, and ACD between the two devices were high. The mean differences in IOL power calculations using the five formulas were not statistically significant between the two devices. CONCLUSIONS: New optical low-coherence reflectometry provides measurements that correlate well to those of partial coherence interferometry, thus it is a precise device that can be used for the pre-operative examination of cataract patients. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4244739/ /pubmed/25370395 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.143930 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hui, Sheng
Yi, Lu
Comparison of two optical biometers in intraocular lens power calculation
title Comparison of two optical biometers in intraocular lens power calculation
title_full Comparison of two optical biometers in intraocular lens power calculation
title_fullStr Comparison of two optical biometers in intraocular lens power calculation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two optical biometers in intraocular lens power calculation
title_short Comparison of two optical biometers in intraocular lens power calculation
title_sort comparison of two optical biometers in intraocular lens power calculation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4244739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25370395
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.143930
work_keys_str_mv AT huisheng comparisonoftwoopticalbiometersinintraocularlenspowercalculation
AT yilu comparisonoftwoopticalbiometersinintraocularlenspowercalculation