Cargando…
Is MR Spectroscopy Really the Best MR-Based Method for the Evaluation of Fatty Liver in Diabetic Patients in Clinical Practice?
OBJECTIVE: To investigate if magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is the best Magnetic Resonance (MR)-based method when compared to gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection and quantification of liver steatosis in diabetic patients in the clinical practice using liver biopsy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4245094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25426708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112574 |
_version_ | 1782346308913201152 |
---|---|
author | Parente, Daniella Braz Rodrigues, Rosana Souza Paiva, Fernando Fernandes Oliveira Neto, Jaime Araújo Machado-Silva, Lilian Lanzoni, Valeria Campos, Carlos Frederico Ferreira Eiras-Araujo, Antonio Luis do Brasil, Pedro Emmanuel Alvarenga Americano Garteiser, Philippe de Brito Gomes, Marilia de Mello Perez, Renata |
author_facet | Parente, Daniella Braz Rodrigues, Rosana Souza Paiva, Fernando Fernandes Oliveira Neto, Jaime Araújo Machado-Silva, Lilian Lanzoni, Valeria Campos, Carlos Frederico Ferreira Eiras-Araujo, Antonio Luis do Brasil, Pedro Emmanuel Alvarenga Americano Garteiser, Philippe de Brito Gomes, Marilia de Mello Perez, Renata |
author_sort | Parente, Daniella Braz |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate if magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is the best Magnetic Resonance (MR)-based method when compared to gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection and quantification of liver steatosis in diabetic patients in the clinical practice using liver biopsy as the reference standard, and to assess the influence of steatohepatitis and fibrosis on liver fat quantification. METHODS: Institutional approval and patient consent were obtained for this prospective study. Seventy-three patients with type 2 diabetes (60 women and 13 men; mean age, 54±9 years) underwent MRI and MRS at 3.0 T. The liver fat fraction was calculated from triple- and multi-echo gradient-echo sequences, and MRS data. Liver specimens were obtained in all patients. The accuracy for liver fat detection was estimated by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis, and the correlation between fat quantification by imaging and histolopathology was analyzed by Spearman's correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The prevalence of hepatic steatosis was 92%. All gradient-echo MRI and MRS findings strongly correlated with biopsy findings (triple-echo, rho = 0.819; multi-echo, rho = 0.773; MRS, rho = 0.767). Areas under the ROC curves to detect mild, moderate, and severe steatosis were: triple-echo sequences, 0.961, 0.975, and 0.962; multi-echo sequences, 0.878, 0.979, and 0.961; and MRS, 0.981, 0.980, and 0.954. The thresholds for mild, moderate, and severe steatosis were: triple-echo sequences, 4.09, 9.34, and 12.34, multi-echo sequences, 7.53, 11.75, and 15.08, and MRS, 1.71, 11.69, and 14.91. Quantification was not significantly influenced by steatohepatitis or fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Liver fat quantification by MR methods strongly correlates with histopathology. Due to the wide availability and easier post-processing, gradient-echo sequences may represent the best imaging method for the detection and quantification of liver fat fraction in diabetic patients in the clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4245094 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42450942014-12-05 Is MR Spectroscopy Really the Best MR-Based Method for the Evaluation of Fatty Liver in Diabetic Patients in Clinical Practice? Parente, Daniella Braz Rodrigues, Rosana Souza Paiva, Fernando Fernandes Oliveira Neto, Jaime Araújo Machado-Silva, Lilian Lanzoni, Valeria Campos, Carlos Frederico Ferreira Eiras-Araujo, Antonio Luis do Brasil, Pedro Emmanuel Alvarenga Americano Garteiser, Philippe de Brito Gomes, Marilia de Mello Perez, Renata PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate if magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is the best Magnetic Resonance (MR)-based method when compared to gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection and quantification of liver steatosis in diabetic patients in the clinical practice using liver biopsy as the reference standard, and to assess the influence of steatohepatitis and fibrosis on liver fat quantification. METHODS: Institutional approval and patient consent were obtained for this prospective study. Seventy-three patients with type 2 diabetes (60 women and 13 men; mean age, 54±9 years) underwent MRI and MRS at 3.0 T. The liver fat fraction was calculated from triple- and multi-echo gradient-echo sequences, and MRS data. Liver specimens were obtained in all patients. The accuracy for liver fat detection was estimated by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis, and the correlation between fat quantification by imaging and histolopathology was analyzed by Spearman's correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The prevalence of hepatic steatosis was 92%. All gradient-echo MRI and MRS findings strongly correlated with biopsy findings (triple-echo, rho = 0.819; multi-echo, rho = 0.773; MRS, rho = 0.767). Areas under the ROC curves to detect mild, moderate, and severe steatosis were: triple-echo sequences, 0.961, 0.975, and 0.962; multi-echo sequences, 0.878, 0.979, and 0.961; and MRS, 0.981, 0.980, and 0.954. The thresholds for mild, moderate, and severe steatosis were: triple-echo sequences, 4.09, 9.34, and 12.34, multi-echo sequences, 7.53, 11.75, and 15.08, and MRS, 1.71, 11.69, and 14.91. Quantification was not significantly influenced by steatohepatitis or fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Liver fat quantification by MR methods strongly correlates with histopathology. Due to the wide availability and easier post-processing, gradient-echo sequences may represent the best imaging method for the detection and quantification of liver fat fraction in diabetic patients in the clinical practice. Public Library of Science 2014-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4245094/ /pubmed/25426708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112574 Text en © 2014 Parente et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Parente, Daniella Braz Rodrigues, Rosana Souza Paiva, Fernando Fernandes Oliveira Neto, Jaime Araújo Machado-Silva, Lilian Lanzoni, Valeria Campos, Carlos Frederico Ferreira Eiras-Araujo, Antonio Luis do Brasil, Pedro Emmanuel Alvarenga Americano Garteiser, Philippe de Brito Gomes, Marilia de Mello Perez, Renata Is MR Spectroscopy Really the Best MR-Based Method for the Evaluation of Fatty Liver in Diabetic Patients in Clinical Practice? |
title | Is MR Spectroscopy Really the Best MR-Based Method for the Evaluation of Fatty Liver in Diabetic Patients in Clinical Practice? |
title_full | Is MR Spectroscopy Really the Best MR-Based Method for the Evaluation of Fatty Liver in Diabetic Patients in Clinical Practice? |
title_fullStr | Is MR Spectroscopy Really the Best MR-Based Method for the Evaluation of Fatty Liver in Diabetic Patients in Clinical Practice? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is MR Spectroscopy Really the Best MR-Based Method for the Evaluation of Fatty Liver in Diabetic Patients in Clinical Practice? |
title_short | Is MR Spectroscopy Really the Best MR-Based Method for the Evaluation of Fatty Liver in Diabetic Patients in Clinical Practice? |
title_sort | is mr spectroscopy really the best mr-based method for the evaluation of fatty liver in diabetic patients in clinical practice? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4245094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25426708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112574 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parentedaniellabraz ismrspectroscopyreallythebestmrbasedmethodfortheevaluationoffattyliverindiabeticpatientsinclinicalpractice AT rodriguesrosanasouza ismrspectroscopyreallythebestmrbasedmethodfortheevaluationoffattyliverindiabeticpatientsinclinicalpractice AT paivafernandofernandes ismrspectroscopyreallythebestmrbasedmethodfortheevaluationoffattyliverindiabeticpatientsinclinicalpractice AT oliveiranetojaimearaujo ismrspectroscopyreallythebestmrbasedmethodfortheevaluationoffattyliverindiabeticpatientsinclinicalpractice AT machadosilvalilian ismrspectroscopyreallythebestmrbasedmethodfortheevaluationoffattyliverindiabeticpatientsinclinicalpractice AT lanzonivaleria ismrspectroscopyreallythebestmrbasedmethodfortheevaluationoffattyliverindiabeticpatientsinclinicalpractice AT camposcarlosfredericoferreira ismrspectroscopyreallythebestmrbasedmethodfortheevaluationoffattyliverindiabeticpatientsinclinicalpractice AT eirasaraujoantonioluis ismrspectroscopyreallythebestmrbasedmethodfortheevaluationoffattyliverindiabeticpatientsinclinicalpractice AT dobrasilpedroemmanuelalvarengaamericano ismrspectroscopyreallythebestmrbasedmethodfortheevaluationoffattyliverindiabeticpatientsinclinicalpractice AT garteiserphilippe ismrspectroscopyreallythebestmrbasedmethodfortheevaluationoffattyliverindiabeticpatientsinclinicalpractice AT debritogomesmarilia ismrspectroscopyreallythebestmrbasedmethodfortheevaluationoffattyliverindiabeticpatientsinclinicalpractice AT demelloperezrenata ismrspectroscopyreallythebestmrbasedmethodfortheevaluationoffattyliverindiabeticpatientsinclinicalpractice |