Cargando…

Setting the One Health Agenda and the Human-Companion Animal Bond

“One Health”, also called “One Medicine”, began as an initiative advocating greater integration of human and animal medicine, in the 1800s. This concept has recently come to prominence, driven by the recognition that 75% of the newly emerging infectious diseases will arise from animal reservoirs, an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takashima, Gregg K., Day, Michael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4245602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25350006
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph111111110
_version_ 1782346381975879680
author Takashima, Gregg K.
Day, Michael J.
author_facet Takashima, Gregg K.
Day, Michael J.
author_sort Takashima, Gregg K.
collection PubMed
description “One Health”, also called “One Medicine”, began as an initiative advocating greater integration of human and animal medicine, in the 1800s. This concept has recently come to prominence, driven by the recognition that 75% of the newly emerging infectious diseases will arise from animal reservoirs, and that successful control and prevention will require a coordinated human medical and veterinary approach. Consequently, many One Health discussions have centered on the surveillance of animals in order to anticipate the potential emergence of new zoonotic diseases. An area that has been given only cursory mention, are the many ways that small companion animals benefit individual, community and possibly world health. The goal of this paper is to briefly review some of the evidenced-based data concerning the benefits of having companion animals in our lives, focusing on four major areas; cancer, heart disease, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and the potential positive economic effects of the human-companion animal bond on One Health. Heart disease and cancer are the two leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the world, while ASD is a growing concern, not only for its individual effects, but also for its effect on family units, educational institutions, and its social implications for the community. In addition, these diseases can greatly affect the national and global cost of healthcare, as well as the economic output of a nation. It is therefore important to include and build on the concept of the Human-Animal Bond (HAB) as it relates to healthcare in these areas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4245602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42456022014-12-02 Setting the One Health Agenda and the Human-Companion Animal Bond Takashima, Gregg K. Day, Michael J. Int J Environ Res Public Health Review “One Health”, also called “One Medicine”, began as an initiative advocating greater integration of human and animal medicine, in the 1800s. This concept has recently come to prominence, driven by the recognition that 75% of the newly emerging infectious diseases will arise from animal reservoirs, and that successful control and prevention will require a coordinated human medical and veterinary approach. Consequently, many One Health discussions have centered on the surveillance of animals in order to anticipate the potential emergence of new zoonotic diseases. An area that has been given only cursory mention, are the many ways that small companion animals benefit individual, community and possibly world health. The goal of this paper is to briefly review some of the evidenced-based data concerning the benefits of having companion animals in our lives, focusing on four major areas; cancer, heart disease, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and the potential positive economic effects of the human-companion animal bond on One Health. Heart disease and cancer are the two leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the world, while ASD is a growing concern, not only for its individual effects, but also for its effect on family units, educational institutions, and its social implications for the community. In addition, these diseases can greatly affect the national and global cost of healthcare, as well as the economic output of a nation. It is therefore important to include and build on the concept of the Human-Animal Bond (HAB) as it relates to healthcare in these areas. MDPI 2014-10-27 2014-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4245602/ /pubmed/25350006 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph111111110 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Takashima, Gregg K.
Day, Michael J.
Setting the One Health Agenda and the Human-Companion Animal Bond
title Setting the One Health Agenda and the Human-Companion Animal Bond
title_full Setting the One Health Agenda and the Human-Companion Animal Bond
title_fullStr Setting the One Health Agenda and the Human-Companion Animal Bond
title_full_unstemmed Setting the One Health Agenda and the Human-Companion Animal Bond
title_short Setting the One Health Agenda and the Human-Companion Animal Bond
title_sort setting the one health agenda and the human-companion animal bond
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4245602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25350006
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph111111110
work_keys_str_mv AT takashimagreggk settingtheonehealthagendaandthehumancompanionanimalbond
AT daymichaelj settingtheonehealthagendaandthehumancompanionanimalbond